Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Roethlisberger HOF?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Roethlisberger HOF?

    Roethlisberger now has the two rings. By most observers, he'd now be a lock for the NFL HOF.

    Even though he played lousy in the first one and hung on by the skin of his teeth tonite, he is virtually guaranteed a HOF berth on retirement, no?

    Let me know your thoughts, all rational Packer Fans.

  • #2
    he's still young, but if he plays anywhere near the level that he's been playing at, then he should make it

    he's not the best qb, but he sure as hell gets things done when he needs to

    Comment


    • #3
      Its hard to say becuase he didn't play particularly well in either of them, and sicne there really is no other instance like this to compare to, you can't use porecedent. To answer, I say he is not HOF yet.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by cpk1994
        Its hard to say becuase he didn't play particularly well in either of them, and sicne there really is no other instance like this to compare to, you can't use porecedent. To answer, I say he is not HOF yet.
        bradshaw and star didn't put up the best numbers either, but they did win

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by red
          Originally posted by cpk1994
          Its hard to say becuase he didn't play particularly well in either of them, and sicne there really is no other instance like this to compare to, you can't use porecedent. To answer, I say he is not HOF yet.
          bradshaw and star didn't put up the best numbers either, but they did win
          True, I was just saying as of now, I dno't think so yet. But as you said, if he continues to play as he has, he will be one when it is all said and done.

          Comment


          • #6
            Likely in, deserving or not. This is the NFL, and the SB is a deal breaker.

            John Elway, despite a great career, was in doubt until he won it.
            --
            Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

            Comment


            • #7
              I think he'll be in.

              Comment


              • #8
                Brady is probably the only "lock" of the young QB's, but Rothlisberger is darn close. A couple more good seasons, and without a doubt, he's in. In a "just win" league, he's a winner.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by retailguy
                  Brady is probably the only "lock" of the young QB's, but Rothlisberger is darn close. A couple more good seasons, and without a doubt, he's in. In a "just win" league, he's a winner.
                  Brady will be 32 before the season starts.
                  Originally posted by 3irty1
                  This is museum quality stupidity.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    at this point no. warner...yes.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I would say no to Rothelisburger at this point, I find it interesting that WR have been MVP's of both the Pittsburgh super bowl wins, not Ben. I also agree that Warner should get in, he has been to three SB's and tonight he played well except for that pick at the end of the 1st half.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Zool
                        Originally posted by retailguy
                        Brady is probably the only "lock" of the young QB's, but Rothlisberger is darn close. A couple more good seasons, and without a doubt, he's in. In a "just win" league, he's a winner.
                        Brady will be 32 before the season starts.

                        To me, he's still one of the "young ones". I knew he was a bit older, but I didn't think that much older... <shit>

                        But anyhow, the point holds. I think Ben needs two more good years. That would be about the time I'd have thought Brady was a "lock".

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          At this point, no. Roethlisberger should not be in the HoF. He won two superbowls on the backs of two historically good defenses. Personally, I would say that since the Hall of Fame is an individual award, individual statistics ought to matter much, much more than championships. Championships are a team victory, winning them or not winning them shouldn't have any bearing on your HoF status.
                          </delurk>

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by retailguy

                            To me, he's still one of the "young ones". I knew he was a bit older, but I didn't think that much older... <shit>
                            Probably time to call it quits and settle down with some model. :P

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by retailguy
                              Originally posted by Zool
                              Originally posted by retailguy
                              Brady is probably the only "lock" of the young QB's, but Rothlisberger is darn close. A couple more good seasons, and without a doubt, he's in. In a "just win" league, he's a winner.
                              Brady will be 32 before the season starts.

                              To me, he's still one of the "young ones". I knew he was a bit older, but I didn't think that much older... <shit>
                              that's because you're an old senile geezer

                              everyone seems young to you

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X