Report: Vikes on verge of acquiring Rosenfels

[swede]

Why? When you look at his stats, and realize that he has insane talent around him...

any QB in the league would look great with his supporting cast.

He is around the 12th best quarterback in the league in my opinion. I don't care if you agree of not, but give me:
Brees - Showed he can guide a team to the playoffs multiple times
Romo - Showed he is clutch in the regular season and get a team a high seed
Brady - Mr playoffs
Manning - Showed he can beat the best team ever in the clutch of a game
Manning - Beat a very good bears team in the super bowl, best RS QB ever
Rivers - Taken teams to the championship game, gutted it out with torn ACL
Warner - super bowl champion, has been there 3 times
Ryan - As a rookie, he easily outperformed our 4th year veteran
Roethlisberger - Won the big one, is clutch, has carried team on back in gutsy game
McNabb - dynamic player, been to the big game, took eagles to championship game consistently early in his career despite only mediocre offensive talent


Cutler/Palmer/Hasselbeck/Flacco/Rodgers are in the next tier down. I'd choose one of those guys on any given day over Rodgers.

I agree that its not fantasy football. They need to keep trying to upgrade the position like they do every other position. They probably won't win a superbowl with Rodgers unless they make a serious change to the way they play offense (think Vikings).

[Partial]

Well, like I said, I disagree. You're entitled to your opinion.

I do think it'd be pretty tough to dispute that the guys listed above Rodgers are better options for winning a game tomorrow.

[cpk1994]

Well, like I said, I disagree. You're entitled to your opinion.

I do think it'd be pretty tough to dispute that the guys listed above Rodgers are better options for winning a game tomorrow.

No it wouldn't. I'd take Rodgers over Flacco and any of those types. Besides, calling a QB who throws for ovew 4000 yards average shows true ignorance. I'm not going to bother debating with your ignorance.

BTW, I am still waiting for you to back up your BS claim about ROn Wolf saying Rodgers is not a winner. I guess I wwon't hold my breath as you don't have the proof anyway and as usual are making crap up.

[falco]

hasn't rodgers only played one year? hard to compare him to guys with a half or whole career behind them already

[Rastak]

Why don't you guys start a Rodgers thread and quit clogging up the Rosenfels thread.

[falco]

Why don't you guys start a Rodgers thread and quit clogging up the Rosenfels thread.

why don't you start your own viker forum and leave us alone troll!!!! j/k ras, you good in my book

[falco]

interesting - seems the broncos are trying to get rid of cutler

[Partial]

Well, like I said, I disagree. You're entitled to your opinion.

I do think it'd be pretty tough to dispute that the guys listed above Rodgers are better options for winning a game tomorrow.

No it wouldn't. I'd take Rodgers over Flacco and any of those types. Besides, calling a QB who throws for ovew 4000 yards average shows true ignorance. I'm not going to bother debating with your ignorance.

BTW, I am still waiting for you to back up your BS claim about ROn Wolf saying Rodgers is not a winner. I guess I wwon't hold my breath as you don't have the proof anyway and as usual are making crap up.

Jon Kitna threw for over 4k yards in 2007. Is he better than average? I certainly don't think so.

They play the audio clip on WSSP several times an hour from Ron Wolf. You can listen online here. Click "Listen Live".

http://www.sportsradio1250.com/

[Fritz]

Why don't you guys start a Rodgers thread and quit clogging up the Rosenfels thread.

I just like that the Vikings got a guy who is named after an herb.

Is he by any chance married to a woman named Rosemary?

[Patler]

Cutler/Palmer/Hasselbeck/Flacco/Rodgers are in the next tier down. I'd choose one of those guys on any given day over Rodgers.

Sounds like Cutler is available. Would you trade even up for Rodgers?

[mission]

Cutler/Palmer/Hasselbeck/Flacco/Rodgers are in the next tier down. I'd choose one of those guys on any given day over Rodgers.

Sounds like Cutler is available. Would you trade even up for Rodgers?

I wouldn't. Southern frat boys with the swoop haircut annoy the shit outta me.

[Fritz]

Me either. I'd take Rodgers. Straight up.

[]{ilr]3]

Cutler/Palmer/Hasselbeck/Flacco/Rodgers are in the next tier down. I'd choose one of those guys on any given day over Rodgers.

Sounds like Cutler is available. Would you trade even up for Rodgers?

I wouldnt either. Cutler has a hell of an arm, but he seems to be unstable. We're talking Ryan Leaf unstable. I know he has had some health issues, but it seems like he cannot handle being an NFL QB.

[mission]

{ilr]3]

Cutler/Palmer/Hasselbeck/Flacco/Rodgers are in the next tier down. I'd choose one of those guys on any given day over Rodgers.

Sounds like Cutler is available. Would you trade even up for Rodgers?

I wouldnt either. Cutler has a hell of an arm, but he seems to be unstable. We're talking Ryan Leaf unstable. I know he has had some health issues, but it seems like he cannot handle being an NFL QB.

I'm tellin ya!! SFS, better known as Southern Fratboy Syndrome... whiny little kids with rich parents and popped-collared Polo shirts. They're everywhere with their silver platters.

[Partial]

Cutler/Palmer/Hasselbeck/Flacco/Rodgers are in the next tier down. I'd choose one of those guys on any given day over Rodgers.

Sounds like Cutler is available. Would you trade even up for Rodgers?

Hell yes.