Tweet
Originally posted by cheesner
2 - 6-10
-
6 = 10-6
2 - 6-10
-
What's up with the Irish music in the background of the highlight film?Originally posted by cheesner"The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."
KYPackComment
-
What's up with the Irish music in the background of the highlight film?[/quote]Originally posted by Fritz
'Cause it's St Paddy's Day, ye heathen. Where's yer Celtic pride?Comment
-
Didn't we only have 4 (Favre, Driver, Kamp, Harris) the year we went 13-3, Mn had 6 and they went 8-8. Pit only had 3 and they won the SB.Originally posted by Rastak6 = 10-6Originally posted by cheesner
2 - 6-10
Comment
-
Making a generalization... what if I said he could run like the wind???Originally posted by cheesnerwistComment
-
What if I said he could break like the wind?Originally posted by wist43"The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."
KYPackComment
-
I am making a generalization?!Originally posted by wist43
You stated that Colledge gets 'knocked 5 yards into the backfield on EVERY snap'. Those are your words.
I posted a link to a video where Colledge is not only not getting pushed back 5 yards, he actually takes the upper hand and pushes back a Probowl player.
Who made the inaccurate generalization?Comment
-
I think he meant that he was making a generalization about Colledge. It might not look very much like what other people see, but it's definitely a generalization.
Comment
-
oh - my bad.Originally posted by hoosierI think he meant that he was making a generalization about Colledge. It might not look very much like what other people see, but it's definitely a generalization.
Problem with generalizations (especially ones such as this that are way off base) is that it undermines all your credibility. Colledge had a good season where I think he has moved into the 'above average' catagory. He is still young and improving and I look forward to seeing what he can do this year.Comment
-
I think some fans' impressions of Colledge are colored by what they read about him from his rookie year. The early reports made it sound like he was somewhat arrogant and having difficulty making the transitions--the physical transition from T to G, and the mental transition from Boise St the the NFL. I have to admit that I didn't see him play during the second half of 2008 (hard to follow the Packers from southern Indiana), and if it weren't for what I read in PR about his improvement over 2008 I might have similar impressions about him.Originally posted by cheesneroh - my bad.Originally posted by hoosierI think he meant that he was making a generalization about Colledge. It might not look very much like what other people see, but it's definitely a generalization.
Problem with generalizations (especially ones such as this that are way off base) is that it undermines all your credibility. Colledge had a good season where I think he has moved into the 'above average' catagory. He is still young and improving and I look forward to seeing what he can do this year.Comment
-
Cheese,Originally posted by cheesneroh - my bad.Originally posted by hoosierI think he meant that he was making a generalization about Colledge. It might not look very much like what other people see, but it's definitely a generalization.
Problem with generalizations (especially ones such as this that are way off base) is that it undermines all your credibility. Colledge had a good season where I think he has moved into the 'above average' catagory. He is still young and improving and I look forward to seeing what he can do this year.
See, I don't think his generalization is way off base. I think Colledge is AWFUL as a guard, and at best serviceable as a tackle. I still believe that if they left him as a tackle, he'd be ok, but that's about it.
I watched every game this past season, including the end of the season, and I did not see much improvement.
I am ready to label him as a bust. That means he'll have a breakout 2009 campaign and you can remind me of this in week 10.Comment
-
Amazing how different people can watch the same thing and take such different impressions away. I'd prefer DC stay at LG because he's so good at it, unless we have a good option at LG, as I think he'd easily beat out Clifton at this point. He could be a dominant RT (far better than Tausher ever was). Colledge has very rare feet and quickness, and has gotten quite strong. J Smith and Beatty are really the only highly rated prospect that compare to his agility, if I had to choose between Colledge and Beatty at LT, I'd probably choose Daryn.
When you watch a big run, nearly always Colledge is dominating somebody clearing the hole (he pancakes A LOT of LB's on the 2nd level). Aaron always snuck behind Daryn. And picked up 100% of his sneaks. I'm pretty sure that he hasn't given up a sack at T since he was a rookie. Aaron played more comfortable (his feet weren't as happy and he was more poised in the pocket) with Daryn at LT than Clifton. The more space DC has to work with, the better he looks.Comment
-
Good lord... I was making a generalization. Beginning to think most of you got dropped on your heads as children. Damn, get a grip.Originally posted by cheesnerwistComment
-
I noted my error over 3 hrs and 4 posts ago.Originally posted by wist43
You can call it a generalization, but it is just a lie. Facing the silliness of your statement you try to redirect rather than admit you were wrong. Because if you are forced to admit DC isn't bad, then you have to admit that he was a good choice by TT. If you start admitting that TT did anything that was right, you would have to contradict just about every post you have made in the last 3 years.Comment
-
Cheesner....how about you....you either:
1) Suggest 6 pro bowlers means automatic superbowl
or
2) Suggest it's bad to have 6 pro bowlers.....
That wasn't the most astute observation I ever saw!
Comment
Comment