Originally posted by BallHawk
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Mock Draft Poll for Packers Pick
Collapse
X
-
far less for lineman. TT's philosophy appears to be to stay away from those guys and I whole heartedly agree.Originally posted by WaldoThat is true for most players. Players peak between 26-31. Before that they typically are mistake prone young'uns (you are better off with them developing on the bench), after that they are injury prone and declining old guys.Originally posted by sheepsheadThey dont last. Statistically they dont play that long. They retire. Look it up.Originally posted by Partialwhat?
It is practically a myth to take a guy "and be set for a decade." QB and LT are really the only positions where that is typically true. There are at best 5-10 players in a draft that will start for 10+ years for a single team.
Clifton has been the starter now for 8 1/2 seasons, Driver has been the starter for 7 seasons, they are the longest tenured starting Packers. I doubt either makes it to 10 full years starting for the Packers.
Basically 1/5th of the "good" players in the NFL turn over every year, it is very rare for any player to be considered "good" for more than 7-8 years.
I think the overall average NFL career is less than 4 years.Lombardi told Starr to "Run it, and let's get the hell out of here!" - 'Ice Bowl' December 31, 1967
Comment
-
Originally posted by GunakorThey spent 4 years developing a tackle into a guard. He's a natural tackle. He would have been a tackle, but we have had 2 pretty outstanding tackles ahead of him. Rather than waste him away on the sidelines they put him in at guard to get him into the game. But the fact remains that Colledge is a natural tackle, and I don't see him playing guard for his whole career. He'll be a guard until Clifton is done.Originally posted by PartialThen you spent 4 years developing a guard and for what? Do you spend another 4 years developing the next guy?
MM has said that Colledge is gonna stay at G if I remember correctly.
They wouldn't have had to spend 4 years developing him into a guard if he was a guard to begin with. They won't have to spend 4 years developing the next guy if the next guy they draft is, you guessed it, a GUARD. Hell, they could spend a 2nd round pick on a natural guard in the next year or two and plug him right in, and probably wouldn't lose much at the position. Colledge is not a great guard by any means. He'd be a better tackle.
This whole idea of yours that a player is what he is and cannot be anything else is really disappointing. Especially when you don't know what the player is in the first place. Colledge is a great example. Colledge is a tackle who was able to play guard. He's still a tackle. He's just playing guard. I guess he isn't who he is, is he?
Colledge blows as a LT. Taylor beat him like a drum a couple years ago. He always seems to need help from the RB. And MM did say he was going to stay at G. The Packers and the media claim that he was their best linemen last year. If that is true, he should stay at G. Why move Clifton? He can't play anywhere else.
Comment
-
If that is your feeling, fair enough. I love the idea of Jackson, but only if we can trade back a couple spots.Originally posted by WaldoNo.....they can't. If Moala is off the board, the next reasonable 3-4 DE frame is in the 5th-7th round areas with Everette Pedescleux, Nadar Abdallah, and Pannel Egboah.Originally posted by gbpackfanA RT for a year. Clifton will be gone after 2009 and Oher could slide over. Oher would be a great pick at 9. He is probably the best T in the draft. People are too hung up on his "learning disability." See that guy, go block him! Done deal (I know, it's not quite that easy. But if Pacman Jones, Tank Johnson, and Chad Johnson can grasp the game, Oher will be able to.)
The Packer can find a rush LB in round 2 and a 3-4 DE in round 3.
There is a big drop from Jackson to the next tier (Hood, Gilbert), a big drop to the next guy (Moala), and a huge free fall to the next guy, who probably isn't even good enough to make it above the PS year 1.
My pick, in this scenario is:

The best 3-4 DE prospect to come around since Richard Seymore in 2001.
Gilbert has the frame and measurables, and can rush a bit, but is not good against the run at all, Hood has the frame and measurables and is more stout against the run, but is nowhere near the polished player. Earlier in his career, LSU actually ran some 3-4 fronts where Jackson played 5-tech.
I can't wait for the draft!
Comment
-
Colledge found out an hour before the game that he was going to be playing LT instead of G, he was a rookie, and I believe that Taylor won the DMVP that year.Originally posted by gbpackfanColledge blows as a LT. Taylor beat him like a drum a couple years ago. He always seems to need help from the RB. And MM did say he was going to stay at G. The Packers and the media claim that he was their best linemen last year. If that is true, he should stay at G. Why move Clifton? He can't play anywhere else.
I haven't seen Daryn need help at T since, and I don't believe that he has given up a sack at T since.
It isn't to move Clifton. Chad is really close to the end, he had a very bad year last year, he was #23 in sacks allowed by LT's, and horrible at run blocking, and some of his sacks allowed were very bad ole's that got Aaron creamed. He just had another knee surgery this offseason. It is not difficult to envision him declining further. If that happens, I expect that Daryn will start at LT for us unless we take one at #9.
Comment
-
With Den at #12 and SD at #16, both teams have big needs there, I doubt he makes it past #16, and don't think that he makes it past #12. If we can trade down with SF or Buf we could get him, but I don't like our chances if we trade down further than that.Originally posted by gbpackfanIf that is your feeling, fair enough. I love the idea of Jackson, but only if we can trade back a couple spots.Originally posted by WaldoNo.....they can't. If Moala is off the board, the next reasonable 3-4 DE frame is in the 5th-7th round areas with Everette Pedescleux, Nadar Abdallah, and Pannel Egboah.Originally posted by gbpackfanA RT for a year. Clifton will be gone after 2009 and Oher could slide over. Oher would be a great pick at 9. He is probably the best T in the draft. People are too hung up on his "learning disability." See that guy, go block him! Done deal (I know, it's not quite that easy. But if Pacman Jones, Tank Johnson, and Chad Johnson can grasp the game, Oher will be able to.)
The Packer can find a rush LB in round 2 and a 3-4 DE in round 3.
There is a big drop from Jackson to the next tier (Hood, Gilbert), a big drop to the next guy (Moala), and a huge free fall to the next guy, who probably isn't even good enough to make it above the PS year 1.
My pick, in this scenario is:

The best 3-4 DE prospect to come around since Richard Seymore in 2001.
Gilbert has the frame and measurables, and can rush a bit, but is not good against the run at all, Hood has the frame and measurables and is more stout against the run, but is nowhere near the polished player. Earlier in his career, LSU actually ran some 3-4 fronts where Jackson played 5-tech.
I can't wait for the draft!
More than one source has a top 10 grade on him. Gil Brandt, Dallas' personnel guy for nearly 30 years (been to a good % of pro days this year too, the one guy that knows what he is talking about moreso than most GM's) has him graded ahead of Raji, who he doesn't have a top 10 grade on.
Comment
-
Um, what?Originally posted by PartialWaldo,
Do you think that he can be an impact player at getting to the passer? If this guy can be like a Cullen Jenkins without the health problems, I'll be on board without a doubt.
Get to the passer? We are now looking for a DE who can get to the passer in a 3-4 scheme?
Jenkins, healthy or not, will not be getting a sniff of too damn many QB jerseys this year.--
Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...
Comment
-
Sheesh. All these ignoramuses we gotta deal with, eh Waldo? Per your boldfaced sections of the post above, I was gonna say the same exact thing. You miss out on Jackson, next thing you know you're lookin' at Pannel Egboah. Everybody knows that. I can't believe these people don't know this stuff!Originally posted by WaldoOriginally posted by gbpackfanA RT for a year. Clifton will be gone after 2009 and Oher could slide over. Oher would be a great pick at 9. He is probably the best T in the draft. People are too hung up on his "learning disability." See that guy, go block him! Done deal (I know, it's not quite that easy. But if Pacman Jones, Tank Johnson, and Chad Johnson can grasp the game, Oher will be able to.)
The Packer can find a rush LB in round 2 and a 3-4 DE in round 3.
No.....they can't. If Moala is off the board, the next reasonable 3-4 DE frame is in the 5th-7th round areas with Everette Pedescleux, Nadar Abdallah, and Pannel Egboah.
There is a big drop from Jackson to the next tier (Hood, Gilbert), a big drop to the next guy (Moala), and a huge free fall to the next guy, who probably isn't even good enough to make it above the PS year 1.
My pick, in this scenario is:

The best 3-4 DE prospect to come around since Richard Seymore in 2001.
Gilbert has the frame and measurables, and can rush a bit, but is not good against the run at all, Hood has the frame and measurables and is more stout against the run, but is nowhere near the polished player. Earlier in his career, LSU actually ran some 3-4 fronts where Jackson played 5-tech.
Seriously Waldo, your research is amazing. It remains to be seen how much plays out the way you suggest, but in the meantime, since your remarks and opinions appear to be based on more research than the rest of us (Patler and one or two others excepted) put together, I'm inclined to give your opinions more weight than, say, the opinions of someone like...... ah, forget it."The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."
KYPack
Comment
-
Well, while there are very few 3-4 DEs who will lead the team in sacks, they do generally need to be able to get enough pressure on the QB in order to be worth blocking in the first place, and they are capable of being cornerstones in the defense.Originally posted by GuinessUm, what?
Get to the passer? We are now looking for a DE who can get to the passer in a 3-4 scheme?
Jenkins, healthy or not, will not be getting a sniff of too damn many QB jerseys this year.</delurk>
Comment
-
I'll stay on the Everette Brown bandwagon, even if it's a bit lonely. The guy has gotten better every year, has a reputation as a team leader, and is a very solid citizen. He also doesn't have Orakpo's injury history. I know some are scared off by the Florida St./Defensive End history, but if he can play, I don't care where he's from.I can't run no more
With that lawless crowd
While the killers in high places
Say their prayers out loud
But they've summoned, they've summoned up
A thundercloud
They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen
Comment
-
The reason Merriman is Merriman is because of Castillo. The reason Ware was Ware was because of Canty. The reason Harrison was Harrison was because of Keisel. A good 3-4 DE might only get 3-5 sacks, but they enable the ILB and OLB to get a whole lot more. If your DE's suck, your ILB's/OLB's aren't going to do much rushing the passer.Originally posted by PartialWaldo,
Do you think that he can be an impact player at getting to the passer? If this guy can be like a Cullen Jenkins without the health problems, I'll be on board without a doubt.
3-4 DE's are more pressure guys than sack guys. The good ones harass the QB all the time, but don't necessarily show up on the stat sheet a lot because of it.
Just like NT, if your DE's suck, your run defense sucks.
There is a tandem relationship between a 3-4 DE and the OLB outside of him, and they work as a team to drop the QB. Often the DE's moves rushing are to give the OLB a clean lane to the QB.
And to be standing right in the way of the 10 yd out pass or inside slant. A 3-4 DE is often a better slant defender than a CB is.
Comment
-
Well, you crusty ol' Texas coot, first of all I'm comin' to your state tomorrow - to Waco. So don't shoot this liberal former pot-smoking northerner if you see him, okay?
Secondly, I'm kind of on that bandwagon of yours. The way our resident experts such as Waldo seem to see it, there are lots of possible OLB's down the line in this draft. Thus, unless you are convinced Orapko is the second coming of Lawrence Taylor, minus the crazy, you might be best off waiting and grabbing, say, an OT or a DE. Though I know you think the Pack is set there, too, you crazed Texan."The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."
KYPack
Comment
-
Its a great year to be Everette Pedescleux that's for sure. Most years this guy isn't getting drafted.
Waldo how do you feel about Kyle Moore as a fit at DE in the 3-4?70% of the Earth is covered by water. The rest is covered by Al Harris.
Comment

Comment