Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Packer Insider Article- Sweet Al

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Packer Insider Article- Sweet Al

    Harris might hold out, but do you care?
    Posted: July 13, 2006


    Rick Braun
    E-MAIL

    Green Bay - As we wait another two weeks until training camp opens, we once again get to play that guessing game.

    "Will (Fill in name) be there for the first day of camp?"

    This year's "Fill in name" is Al Harris.

    So will the unhappy cornerback be where he's supposed to be? Will he be on Clark Hinkle Field for the first workout? Will he show up for his physical? Will he be at the first meeting?

    These questions grip the Packer Nation again.

    In 2004 it was Mike McKenzie.

    In 2005 it was Javon Walker.

    In 2006 it's Harris.

    And we're left here with all these questions.

    And I've decided the answer is pretty simple.

    The answer is . . . I simply don't give a darn any more.

    Three consecutive years of petulance, and I've pretty much had it.

    Show up if you feel like it Al, don't show up if you don't feel like it. I couldn't care less.

    You're unhappy, I hear, because your contract doesn't quite match up to those of Aaron Kampman and Charles Woodson.

    Tough.

    You seemed pretty happy when you signed it back in 2004.

    Judging by your appearance on "MTV Cribs," you're obviously not wondering where your next meal is coming from or living in squalor.

    So somebody makes more money than you. Big deal. Call me when you have a real problem.

    Call me when you can't afford food for the family.

    Call me when the price of a tank of gas means you're only getting a quarter of a tank at a time.

    But don't go into a snit because someone else got a better contract than the one you yourself were only so happy to sign two years ago.

    The McKenzie snit ruined 2004 for the Packers. Remember that team, Al? It was the one that just missed going to the NFC championship game a year earlier. The team that Brett Favre pretty much said Super Bowl or bust about.

    Did you like having a chance at the Super Bowl wrecked by a crybaby?

    How about the 2005 team?

    Walker skipped all of the off-season programs and camps but showed up for training camp. Then, in a most-unfortunate occurrence he got hurt. Of course that all became management's fault and Walker got his wish and an under-valued ticket out of town.

    The only good part about all of that was he at least got rid of Drew Rosenhaus before he got his money from the Denver Broncos.

    But here we are in 2006, and now we've got to wonder about whether you'll be gracing us with your presence.

    And I'm tired of it.

    Go ahead and call it business.

    The funny part is, players always say it's business. Nothing personal, they're just looking out for themselves. Don't take their holdouts personally, the players always say.

    Then the team makes a business decision and players start popping out of the woodwork saying they're underpaid for this reason or that. Or the team doesn't care about them.

    Or - one of my favorites - it's not about the money but about respect.

    We all know it's always about the money.

    Never mind that fans have to spend $65 to sit in nose-bleed seats. The players believe there is an infinite supply of such suckers.

    In Green Bay, the waiting list for season tickets is miles long. Stand all those folks in a line, and we're not talking figuratively.

    But what if . . . what if . . . what if fans finally said they'd had enough?

    What if a different player crying about his contract every year finally made the majority of fans say they were done with it all?

    Yeah, that's living in a dream. Yeah, it's wishful thinking. Yeah, it's just not going to happen.

    But what if, just once, fans could send the message? How would they do it?

    We'll never find that out in Green Bay. With a team where folks take their vacations and travel from around the country just to stand outside the fence of a practice field, we're never going to find out what could happen if the fans decided to spend their money elsewhere.

    And we're not even suggesting that they do that in this space. But what if?

    What if every-year holdouts were enough to send the folks elsewhere?

    The Packers will never find that out.

    But what the Packers could do to fight the situation is at least take a stand.

    They capitulated to McKenzie, sending him to the New Orleans Saints for a player since waived and a second-round pick that turned into Nick Collins.

    And they again capitulated to Walker, sending him to Denver for a second-round pick.

    But just once . . . just once wouldn't it be nice to see a team take a stand. "Play for what your contract says or retire."

    Walker claimed he'd retire rather than play again for the Packers. Wouldn't you have liked to see them call his bluff?

    Now it's Harris who's posturing. And it would be nice if the Packers took a stand.
    TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

  • #2
    Last year in JS they deleted some of the PI stuff I copied and pasted onto their forum. This year I look forward to posting nearly every dam article and I'll always be happy to take request so somebody can benefit from the $3 per month I pay.
    TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

    Comment


    • #3

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by GrnBay007


        You know, if Javon had rasta threads we could blame it on that (3 years running) and use it during contract negotiation (no rasta clause) or scouting.
        The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have.
        Vince Lombardi

        "Not really interested in being a spoiler or an underdog. We're the Green Bay Packers." McCarthy.

        Comment


        • #5
          let him sit
          Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

          Comment


          • #6
            Would anybody be angry if after signing our picks and checking the market we tossed Al a little extra money? Re-structered the final years on his contract to give him a little more?

            I don't think that this would be the end of the world to the team. I find it kind of ridiculous to think that paying an underpaid player, who had a huge impact on the team in previous years, a little extra money to make him happy is a bad thing. It will not create a huge domino effect. We also wouldn't even have to change his salary we'd just add incentives to the contract that would be him for defensed passes and interceptions.

            What I find dumb is dealing with hold-outs the same way for the past two years and losing two of our best players on the team due to it. Do we really want to lose another?

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by OS PA
              Would anybody be angry if after signing our picks and checking the market we tossed Al a little extra money? Re-structered the final years on his contract to give him a little more?

              I don't think that this would be the end of the world to the team. I find it kind of ridiculous to think that paying an underpaid player, who had a huge impact on the team in previous years, a little extra money to make him happy is a bad thing. It will not create a huge domino effect. We also wouldn't even have to change his salary we'd just add incentives to the contract that would be him for defensed passes and interceptions.

              What I find dumb is dealing with hold-outs the same way for the past two years and losing two of our best players on the team due to it. Do we really want to lose another?
              He played well last year and I would support a small/moderate 'extra' bonus as a sign of good faith. It serves the purpose to keep him playing well, shows potential FAs that we do pay for performance and allows current players to see that if you do well you can be rewarded.

              That said, do I think TT would do that? - nope
              The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have.
              Vince Lombardi

              "Not really interested in being a spoiler or an underdog. We're the Green Bay Packers." McCarthy.

              Comment


              • #8
                I'm with you OS. Open up the wallet and show the man some love. Harris has been huge. We've played the hard ball route, and it's worked great -- buh bye Mikey, buh bye Javon.

                We did the right thing with Driver, and I'd like to see us do it with Harris. He's been a stud, the cap has gone way up since he signed his deal, other guys of his caliber, in terms of importance to the team, have made more. So why the heck not?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Show him the money.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I care if Harris holds out, I don't think he will, but if he has a problem he should have his agent call TT instead of whining to the press about it. He's one of the better players on the team but I think he's being paid decent money for his production. For him to point at Kampman's contract was out of line imo, you never heard Kampman bitching about what Harris was getting paid.
                    Thanks Ted!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      You guys wanna offer guaranteed cash? I was thinking more like a few extra LTBE's. Dangle that carrot. You want a huge payday? It's right here on the Pro Bowl list...if the $$ is for respect, then make me respect you.
                      "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I don't think the Harris holdout is comparable to Walker's and McKenzie's. It's just not very ugly, and Al does a respectable job of keeping his foot out of his mouth.

                        That said, he has very little leverage. And he's not grossly underpaid.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I don't think it's about showing him the money as although most agree he signed an undervalued contract for financial security, he's produced at a high level.

                          It's about setting precedent and renegotiating contracts (extending is a different story) and what it means to the other players under contract. I wouldn't want to have to dance that line like Thompson is stuck with but then again he's paid well to take care of things like this.

                          Since I'm in the corner of Harris being worthy of a raise, I'd got the MJZiggy route and amend the contract to include nice performance based bonuses and that way should he continue to perform at a pro-bowl or near pro-bowl level he gets paid. No harm in that and it sets the tone that if the Pack renegotiates contracts it for lighting a fire under the player to continue to achieve and not rest on past laurels.

                          Seems to be a win/win situation as long as Harris isn't just asking for more guaranteed base pay. Then I say he needs to honor it.
                          60% of the time it works every time.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Question:

                            If you open the bag of money for Al - don't you think that everyone else who "feels underpaid" is gonna come knocking?


                            Hmm??
                            "Everyone's born anarchist and atheist until people start lying to them" ~ wise philosopher

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              But that's the point. Showing a little love know -- Zigg's is right, LTBEs (Likely To Be Earned bonuses, for those new to the show) probably make the most sense, will prevent you from having to show a lot of love later.

                              I'm not saying throw tons of cash his way, but do throw some.

                              What I'd like to have happen is the Pack getting a little better at dealing with these situations early. If a guy's agent indicates there's dissatisfaction with a current deal, the Pack should make a quick judgment. If we care (as we do with Harris), then get together quickly and quietly with the agent and get something done. If we don't, then let it play out in the press, where the player will inevitably take the hit. But none of this "We don't renegotiate, ever" crap. Because the Pack does when it wants to (Driver).

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X