With the front 7 much improved the secondary should be even better and see a lot more INT's.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Revamped D will make secondary better
Collapse
X
-
Re: Revamped D will make secondary better
Originally posted by LL2With the front 7 much improved the secondary should be even better and see a lot more INT's.
Are you 100% sure their front 7 is "much" improved? A brand new defense being installed, new coaches and 2 rookies who likely will get prominent roles. That sounds like more questions than answers. That having been said, Green Bay's front 7 certainly "might" be better than 2008. I don't think it's cut and dried at this point. I think it's more likely an evolution during the season to being "much" improved.
-
Re: Revamped D will make secondary better
Logical answer, hard to argue with it. But you must not have watched a lot of GB football last year. We couldn't stop anyone on the run ... almost by default, it's much improved. I'd even put a paycheck on it!Originally posted by RastakOriginally posted by LL2With the front 7 much improved the secondary should be even better and see a lot more INT's.
Are you 100% sure their front 7 is "much" improved? A brand new defense being installed, new coaches and 2 rookies who likely will get prominent roles. That sounds like more questions than answers. That having been said, Green Bay's front 7 certainly "might" be better than 2008. I don't think it's cut and dried at this point. I think it's more likely an evolution during the season to being "much" improved.
Comment
-
Re: Revamped D will make secondary better
Our vets getting healthy again makes this front 7 much improved, and that's without the rookies and their contributions. Or the new scheme that will actually use the front 7 to, you know, do things on a football field instead of just chasing and tackling a ball carrier 4 yards beyond the first down marker.Originally posted by missionLogical answer, hard to argue with it. But you must not have watched a lot of GB football last year. We couldn't stop anyone on the run ... almost by default, it's much improved. I'd even put a paycheck on it!Originally posted by RastakOriginally posted by LL2With the front 7 much improved the secondary should be even better and see a lot more INT's.
Are you 100% sure their front 7 is "much" improved? A brand new defense being installed, new coaches and 2 rookies who likely will get prominent roles. That sounds like more questions than answers. That having been said, Green Bay's front 7 certainly "might" be better than 2008. I don't think it's cut and dried at this point. I think it's more likely an evolution during the season to being "much" improved.Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to grow
Comment
-
Re: Revamped D will make secondary better
I'm in 100% agreement. They got better, no doubt. Coaching alone they got better, but Raji is a huge addition right out of the gate. He's legit right now.Originally posted by missionLogical answer, hard to argue with it. But you must not have watched a lot of GB football last year. We couldn't stop anyone on the run ... almost by default, it's much improved. I'd even put a paycheck on it!Formerly known as JustinHarrell.
Comment
-
Re: Revamped D will make secondary better
He did well in Senior Bowl practice, then tanked in the game. He's got a lot to prove on the field. He looks like a good prospect, but lacks pro technique. BJ is still a rook, no matter his great potential.Originally posted by JustinHarrellI'm in 100% agreement. They got better, no doubt. Coaching alone they got better, but Raji is a huge addition right out of the gate. He's legit right now.Originally posted by missionLogical answer, hard to argue with it. But you must not have watched a lot of GB football last year. We couldn't stop anyone on the run ... almost by default, it's much improved. I'd even put a paycheck on it!
Comment
-
Re: Revamped D will make secondary better
Yes, Raji is a rook but he still may command double teams which instantly upgrades the d-line.Originally posted by KYPackHe did well in Senior Bowl practice, then tanked in the game. He's got a lot to prove on the field. He looks like a good prospect, but lacks pro technique. BJ is still a rook, no matter his great potential.Originally posted by JustinHarrellI'm in 100% agreement. They got better, no doubt. Coaching alone they got better, but Raji is a huge addition right out of the gate. He's legit right now.Originally posted by missionLogical answer, hard to argue with it. But you must not have watched a lot of GB football last year. We couldn't stop anyone on the run ... almost by default, it's much improved. I'd even put a paycheck on it!
Comment
-
Re: Revamped D will make secondary better
Word. They set the bar pretty low last year.Originally posted by missionLogical answer, hard to argue with it. But you must not have watched a lot of GB football last year. We couldn't stop anyone on the run ... almost by default, it's much improved. I'd even put a paycheck on it!Originally posted by RastakOriginally posted by LL2With the front 7 much improved the secondary should be even better and see a lot more INT's.
Are you 100% sure their front 7 is "much" improved? A brand new defense being installed, new coaches and 2 rookies who likely will get prominent roles. That sounds like more questions than answers. That having been said, Green Bay's front 7 certainly "might" be better than 2008. I don't think it's cut and dried at this point. I think it's more likely an evolution during the season to being "much" improved.When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.
Comment

Comment