Originally posted by Scott Campbell
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
BRETT FAVRE IS BACK
Collapse
X
-
I'm with Fritz too.Originally posted by missionAnd Fritz won't be 'the only one' that's for sure... either way, I'm good. I'm a Packer fan andOriginally posted by Scott CampbellOriginally posted by mraynrandYou will be the only one. Especially if Favre were to have a very good year, like 2007 until his final half of football. Favre plays well and wins a Superbowl for the Vikings? Thompson will be lucky to keep his job. But I don't see it anywhere close to happening.Originally posted by FritzIf Brett Favre comes back and leads the Vikings to the SB, I will not think that Thompson shoulda/coulda with Favre. I will not change my mind and think, "Geez, if only we still had Brett Favre."
I respectfully disagree. It'll always be an issue with the fans. But it can't be an issue for the organization. They've moved on. Ted will get judged on his own merit - not Favre's. IMO
Comment
-
FYI: in said interview he admits that HE was at fault as well as packer brassOriginally posted by missionThis interview on ESPN right now.. dated Feb 13th with Favre...
I've never seen this, I really can't believe what I'm hearing... his ego, his sensitivity, his need to ramble... jesus, who the fuck does this? How many greats have gone out with dignity?
I'm really amazed at this interview !!
u never hear favre's detractors mention this tho huh?!
wonder y........They said God has a Tim Tebow complex!
Brew Crew in 2011!!!
Comment
-
I agree. If he plays for the Vikes to spite the organization, I want the crap beaten out of him in the worst way possible. I want Deanna weeping as they drag his 265 pound fat ass off the semi-natural turf of Lambeau Field. I want hard core loyalist Packer fans to pour beer and other assorted items on his unconscious body (without reviving him of course) as they casually cart him to the unheated visitor's locker room. I hope he tumbles off the cart onto hard concrete at least once on the way out.Originally posted by JustinHarrellI don't know how Ted's feeling, but I'd be pissed if that jerk got the best of us. I'm really hoping to win the division, stomp him out and take him down. For some reason I'd really enjoy that."Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Comment
-
Because it doesn't fuckin matter, that's why.Originally posted by MOBB DEEPFYI: in said interview he admits that HE was at fault as well as packer brassOriginally posted by missionThis interview on ESPN right now.. dated Feb 13th with Favre...
I've never seen this, I really can't believe what I'm hearing... his ego, his sensitivity, his need to ramble... jesus, who the fuck does this? How many greats have gone out with dignity?
I'm really amazed at this interview !!
u never hear favre's detractors mention this tho huh?!
wonder y........
It's easy to say you messed up after the fact. What's done is done and he still chose to go about it how he did. Just cuz on Feb 13 he admitted HE was at fault doesn't change anything.
And adding "as well as Packer brass" or however he worded it is definitely a half assed admittance and one that means jack shit, really.
If the Packers had to do it all over again, they would do the exact same thing.
Comment
-
Yet he is still bitching and moaning. Kind of hard to accept that when he can't let the situation go.Originally posted by MOBB DEEPFYI: in said interview he admits that HE was at fault as well as packer brassOriginally posted by missionThis interview on ESPN right now.. dated Feb 13th with Favre...
I've never seen this, I really can't believe what I'm hearing... his ego, his sensitivity, his need to ramble... jesus, who the fuck does this? How many greats have gone out with dignity?
I'm really amazed at this interview !!
u never hear favre's detractors mention this tho huh?!
wonder y........
Comment
-
he he....probably rightOriginally posted by missionYeah, if you have a Favre poster above your bed.Originally posted by MOBB DEEPthat feb 13 interview is actually pretty awesomeThey said God has a Tim Tebow complex!
Brew Crew in 2011!!!
Comment
-
Where did I imply that Ted is the one with a problem?Originally posted by cpk1994Favre is the one with a problem, not Ted. It's up to Favre.Originally posted by GunakorOriginally posted by PackerBluesIs there any other way, or a better way, that anyone could think of for Favre to get back at Thompson?
Is there a circumstance where Brett doesn't have to get back at Ted at all? One where all parties involved could just let bygones be bygones, and neither side is seeking revenge? This circumstance is the one I'd prefer most of all. I would hope it's at least a possibility.Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to grow
Comment
-
I know it wasn't intentional but when you say "all parties involved" and "neither side is seeking revenge" it kinda of comes off that way. I know you didn't mean it that way, I just wanted to be clear.Originally posted by GunakorWhere did I imply that Ted is the one with a problem?Originally posted by cpk1994Favre is the one with a problem, not Ted. It's up to Favre.Originally posted by GunakorOriginally posted by PackerBluesIs there any other way, or a better way, that anyone could think of for Favre to get back at Thompson?
Is there a circumstance where Brett doesn't have to get back at Ted at all? One where all parties involved could just let bygones be bygones, and neither side is seeking revenge? This circumstance is the one I'd prefer most of all. I would hope it's at least a possibility.
Comment
-
I'm trying not to single anybody out in the deal anymore. I want both parties to drop it. If one has already, great. But again, I'm not singling anyone out. If Favre lets this go, then both have let it go. That's the point I was getting at, without naming names. Because naming names and taking a solid stance on this issue - one that doesn't matter in the least anyway - only starts arguments. It creates that line drawn in the sand that everybody will stand on one side or the other of. And then the battle begins. I don't want any part of that. So it's nobody's fault, it's everybody's fault, and once everybody lets it go Packer Nation will be a happier place to be.Originally posted by cpk1994I know it wasn't intentional but when you say "all parties involved" and "neither side is seeking revenge" it kinda of comes off that way. I know you didn't mean it that way, I just wanted to be clear.Originally posted by GunakorWhere did I imply that Ted is the one with a problem?Originally posted by cpk1994Favre is the one with a problem, not Ted. It's up to Favre.Originally posted by GunakorOriginally posted by PackerBluesIs there any other way, or a better way, that anyone could think of for Favre to get back at Thompson?
Is there a circumstance where Brett doesn't have to get back at Ted at all? One where all parties involved could just let bygones be bygones, and neither side is seeking revenge? This circumstance is the one I'd prefer most of all. I would hope it's at least a possibility.Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to grow
Comment
-
Then go shoot Ted's dog. If Ted doesn't have a dog, buy one, put it on his front lawn and shoot that. Then you will have your blood atonement.Originally posted by Scott CampbellOriginally posted by GunakorSo it's nobody's fault, it's everybody's fault, and once everybody lets it go Packer Nation will be a happier place to be.
Any resolution that doesn't include some sort of blood atonement will leave me largely unsatisfied.
Comment

Comment