Favre to stay RETIRED. Per Yahoo sports.

[Rastak]

Childress on Rosenfels:


"We need to put somebody in place that will push [Jackson] and compete with him, and I think competition is the nature of the game," Childress told reporters at the NFL combine last week in Indianapolis. "At some places it may not be ... [but] in our situation, we need to have a good, healthy competition because I think that makes everybody better."

And your quote is common knowledge so I have no idea where all the Sage is the starter shit comes from.

[falco]

THere is a reason he isn't coaching....

roll your eyes if you must, but having a carosuel at the most important postion on the team usually ends up getting the coach fired.

There is a difference between having a "carosuel" at QB and continually adding depth and inviting competition at the position.

[falco]

Childress on Rosenfels:


"We need to put somebody in place that will push [Jackson] and compete with him, and I think competition is the nature of the game," Childress told reporters at the NFL combine last week in Indianapolis. "At some places it may not be ... [but] in our situation, we need to have a good, healthy competition because I think that makes everybody better."

And your quote is common knowledge so I have no idea where all the Sage is the starter shit comes from.

Well, knowledge and some of the posters on this board don't go hand in hand.

[cpk1994]

Someone should tell Jon Gruden then.

THere is a reason he isn't coaching....

Gruden was just the coach. McKay is the GM, and he was the one who made the trade. Gruden wasn't the one who made the trade, and that trade isn't the reason he's not coaching anymore. Neither example is very good IMO.

Yes, but Gruden was the one who couldn't decide on a QB.

[falco]

Someone should tell Jon Gruden then.

THere is a reason he isn't coaching....

Gruden was just the coach. McKay is the GM, and he was the one who made the trade. Gruden wasn't the one who made the trade, and that trade isn't the reason he's not coaching anymore. Neither example is very good IMO.

Yes, but Gruden was the one who couldn't decide on a QB.

Dude, who gives a shit? My point is that you just got done saying you don't trade for a QB unless he is going to start, and I'm just telling you that it was an idiotic remark.

[cpk1994]

Childress on Rosenfels:


"We need to put somebody in place that will push [Jackson] and compete with him, and I think competition is the nature of the game," Childress told reporters at the NFL combine last week in Indianapolis. "At some places it may not be ... [but] in our situation, we need to have a good, healthy competition because I think that makes everybody better."

And your quote is common knowledge so I have no idea where all the Sage is the starter shit comes from.

Of course Childresss would say that. It isn't a slam dunk that Sage could beat Jackson out. He can still want Sage as his starter. If Sage blows in preseason it will be easire to hand the job to Jackson than if he handed the job to Sage and said publicly "Sage is my guy".

[Rastak]

Childress on Rosenfels:


"We need to put somebody in place that will push [Jackson] and compete with him, and I think competition is the nature of the game," Childress told reporters at the NFL combine last week in Indianapolis. "At some places it may not be ... [but] in our situation, we need to have a good, healthy competition because I think that makes everybody better."

And your quote is common knowledge so I have no idea where all the Sage is the starter shit comes from.

Of course Childresss would say that. It isn't a slam dunk that Sage could beat Jackson out. He can still want Sage as his starter. If Sage blows in preseason it will be easire to hand the job to Jackson than if he handed the job to Sage and said publicly "Sage is my guy".

Well, I'm not sure sure where you live but I can assure you in Minnesota there is nothing coming from either Winter Park, or the press indicating Rosenfelds has the inside track. In fact, most of the scribes seem to believe Jackson has the edge and that it's his job to lose.

A 4th for a solid second option if the guy you've been trying to develop fails his last chance isn't too overpriced. I think he will start but it's far from a done deal from almost every source I've heard. In fact, one current theory is that Speilman wants Rosenfelds but Chilly favors Jackson.

It will be an open competition and Chilly already publicly stated they'd both get equal time with the #1s.

[falco]

Childress on Rosenfels:


"We need to put somebody in place that will push [Jackson] and compete with him, and I think competition is the nature of the game," Childress told reporters at the NFL combine last week in Indianapolis. "At some places it may not be ... [but] in our situation, we need to have a good, healthy competition because I think that makes everybody better."

And your quote is common knowledge so I have no idea where all the Sage is the starter shit comes from.

Of course Childresss would say that. It isn't a slam dunk that Sage could beat Jackson out. He can still want Sage as his starter. If Sage blows in preseason it will be easire to hand the job to Jackson than if he handed the job to Sage and said publicly "Sage is my guy".

Well, I'm not sure sure where you live but I can assure you in Minnesota there is nothing coming from either Winder Park, or the press indicating Rosenfelds has the inside track. In fact, most of the scribes seem to believe Jackson has the edge and that it's his job to lose.

A 4th for a solid second option if the guy you've been trying to develop fails his last chance isn't too overpriced. I think he will start but it's far from a done deal from almost every source I've heard. In fact, one current theory is that Speilman wants Rosenfelds but Chilly favors Jackson.

It will be an open competition and Chilly already publicly stated they'd both get equal time with the #1s.

You're wasting your breath. CPK thinks David Carr went to Carolina to replace Jake Delhomme, and Joey Harrington went to Atlanta to replace Michael Vick.

[cpk1994]

Childress on Rosenfels:


"We need to put somebody in place that will push [Jackson] and compete with him, and I think competition is the nature of the game," Childress told reporters at the NFL combine last week in Indianapolis. "At some places it may not be ... [but] in our situation, we need to have a good, healthy competition because I think that makes everybody better."

And your quote is common knowledge so I have no idea where all the Sage is the starter shit comes from.

Of course Childresss would say that. It isn't a slam dunk that Sage could beat Jackson out. He can still want Sage as his starter. If Sage blows in preseason it will be easire to hand the job to Jackson than if he handed the job to Sage and said publicly "Sage is my guy".

Well, I'm not sure sure where you live but I can assure you in Minnesota there is nothing coming from either Winter Park, or the press indicating Rosenfelds has the inside track. In fact, most of the scribes seem to believe Jackson has the edge and that it's his job to lose.

A 4th for a solid second option if the guy you've been trying to develop fails his last chance isn't too overpriced. I think he will start but it's far from a done deal from almost every source I've heard. In fact, one current theory is that Speilman wants Rosenfelds but Chilly favors Jackson.

It will be an open competition and Chilly already publicly stated they'd both get equal time with the #1s.

Than that theory kind of proves my point. Spielman made the trade becuase he wanted him to be the starter. They would never say out loud to anyone that "Sage is the guy" becuase you can't be 100% certain that Sage is that superior to Jackson. Unlike the Bears where Cutler is a far superior upgrade to what they have.

[cpk1994]

Childress on Rosenfels:


"We need to put somebody in place that will push [Jackson] and compete with him, and I think competition is the nature of the game," Childress told reporters at the NFL combine last week in Indianapolis. "At some places it may not be ... [but] in our situation, we need to have a good, healthy competition because I think that makes everybody better."

And your quote is common knowledge so I have no idea where all the Sage is the starter shit comes from.

Of course Childresss would say that. It isn't a slam dunk that Sage could beat Jackson out. He can still want Sage as his starter. If Sage blows in preseason it will be easire to hand the job to Jackson than if he handed the job to Sage and said publicly "Sage is my guy".

Well, I'm not sure sure where you live but I can assure you in Minnesota there is nothing coming from either Winder Park, or the press indicating Rosenfelds has the inside track. In fact, most of the scribes seem to believe Jackson has the edge and that it's his job to lose.

A 4th for a solid second option if the guy you've been trying to develop fails his last chance isn't too overpriced. I think he will start but it's far from a done deal from almost every source I've heard. In fact, one current theory is that Speilman wants Rosenfelds but Chilly favors Jackson.

It will be an open competition and Chilly already publicly stated they'd both get equal time with the #1s.

You're wasting your breath. CPK thinks David Carr went to Carolina to replace Jake Delhomme, and Joey Harrington went to Atlanta to replace Michael Vick.

No since I think they are absolute garbage and that Delhomme is still viable. Before Rosenfels, the Vikings had nothing. As for Vick, having to find a QB becuase your franchise one went to prison is a lot different than the Vikings who had garbage to begin with. Thank YOu for being a cock.

[Gunakor]

Childress on Rosenfels:


"We need to put somebody in place that will push [Jackson] and compete with him, and I think competition is the nature of the game," Childress told reporters at the NFL combine last week in Indianapolis. "At some places it may not be ... [but] in our situation, we need to have a good, healthy competition because I think that makes everybody better."

And your quote is common knowledge so I have no idea where all the Sage is the starter shit comes from.

Of course Childresss would say that. It isn't a slam dunk that Sage could beat Jackson out. He can still want Sage as his starter. If Sage blows in preseason it will be easire to hand the job to Jackson than if he handed the job to Sage and said publicly "Sage is my guy".

Well, I'm not sure sure where you live but I can assure you in Minnesota there is nothing coming from either Winter Park, or the press indicating Rosenfelds has the inside track. In fact, most of the scribes seem to believe Jackson has the edge and that it's his job to lose.

A 4th for a solid second option if the guy you've been trying to develop fails his last chance isn't too overpriced. I think he will start but it's far from a done deal from almost every source I've heard. In fact, one current theory is that Speilman wants Rosenfelds but Chilly favors Jackson.

It will be an open competition and Chilly already publicly stated they'd both get equal time with the #1s.

Than that theory kind of proves my point. Spielman made the trade becuase he wanted him to be the starter. They would never say out loud to anyone that "Sage is the guy" becuase you can't be 100% certain that Sage is that superior to Jackson. Unlike the Bears where Cutler is a far superior upgrade to what they have.

You are speculating. They said they made the trade to provide more competition for the job in camp. It makes sense. It's not like they were going to find a better quarterback in the draft with that pick anyway.

[falco]

As for Vick, having to find a QB becuase your franchise one went to prison is a lot different than the Vikings who had garbage to begin with. Thank YOu for being a cock.

The falcons picked up Harrington prior to Vick's scandal with the dogs...he was a planned backup.

[Scott Campbell]

In fact, one current theory is that Speilman wants Rosenfelds but Chilly favors Jackson.

I'm starting to like Chilly almost as much as I liked Tice.

[Rastak]

Childress on Rosenfels:


"We need to put somebody in place that will push [Jackson] and compete with him, and I think competition is the nature of the game," Childress told reporters at the NFL combine last week in Indianapolis. "At some places it may not be ... [but] in our situation, we need to have a good, healthy competition because I think that makes everybody better."

And your quote is common knowledge so I have no idea where all the Sage is the starter shit comes from.

Of course Childresss would say that. It isn't a slam dunk that Sage could beat Jackson out. He can still want Sage as his starter. If Sage blows in preseason it will be easire to hand the job to Jackson than if he handed the job to Sage and said publicly "Sage is my guy".

Well, I'm not sure sure where you live but I can assure you in Minnesota there is nothing coming from either Winter Park, or the press indicating Rosenfelds has the inside track. In fact, most of the scribes seem to believe Jackson has the edge and that it's his job to lose.

A 4th for a solid second option if the guy you've been trying to develop fails his last chance isn't too overpriced. I think he will start but it's far from a done deal from almost every source I've heard. In fact, one current theory is that Speilman wants Rosenfelds but Chilly favors Jackson.

It will be an open competition and Chilly already publicly stated they'd both get equal time with the #1s.

Than that theory kind of proves my point. Spielman made the trade becuase he wanted him to be the starter. They would never say out loud to anyone that "Sage is the guy" becuase you can't be 100% certain that Sage is that superior to Jackson. Unlike th
e Bears where Cutler is a far superior upgrade to what they have.

But players know damn well GMs don't set the depth chart, right? Why would he not believe the dude who actually controls it?

[cpk1994]

Childress on Rosenfels:


"We need to put somebody in place that will push [Jackson] and compete with him, and I think competition is the nature of the game," Childress told reporters at the NFL combine last week in Indianapolis. "At some places it may not be ... [but] in our situation, we need to have a good, healthy competition because I think that makes everybody better."

And your quote is common knowledge so I have no idea where all the Sage is the starter shit comes from.

Of course Childresss would say that. It isn't a slam dunk that Sage could beat Jackson out. He can still want Sage as his starter. If Sage blows in preseason it will be easire to hand the job to Jackson than if he handed the job to Sage and said publicly "Sage is my guy".

Well, I'm not sure sure where you live but I can assure you in Minnesota there is nothing coming from either Winter Park, or the press indicating Rosenfelds has the inside track. In fact, most of the scribes seem to believe Jackson has the edge and that it's his job to lose.

A 4th for a solid second option if the guy you've been trying to develop fails his last chance isn't too overpriced. I think he will start but it's far from a done deal from almost every source I've heard. In fact, one current theory is that Speilman wants Rosenfelds but Chilly favors Jackson.

It will be an open competition and Chilly already publicly stated they'd both get equal time with the #1s.

Than that theory kind of proves my point. Spielman made the trade becuase he wanted him to be the starter. They would never say out loud to anyone that "Sage is the guy" becuase you can't be 100% certain that Sage is that superior to Jackson. Unlike th
e Bears where Cutler is a far superior upgrade to what they have.

But players know damn well GMs don't set the depth chart, right? Why would he not believe the dude who actually controls it?

Becuase GM's have ways of getting what they want. After all they are the coaches boss. If a GM wants it bad enough, he'll get it.