Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bears combat emerging 3-4 defenses with Cutler

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bears combat emerging 3-4 defenses with Cutler

    Four Down Territory, May 12: Bears combat emerging 3-4 defenses with Cutler
    By
    Brad Biggs
    on May 12, 2009 12:30 PM | Permalink | Comments (13) | TrackBacks (0)

    cutler512.jpg

    Let's get right to the mail.

    Q: My question concerns the Green Bay Packers' implementation of the 3-4 defense. Under Lovie Smith's tenure, the Chicago Bears' record vs. teams that run the 3-4 is 2-6. Here are the results:

    2004: Houston Texans (coached by Dom Capers) 24 v. BEARS 5
    2005: Cleveland Browns 20 v. BEARS 10; BEARS 17 v. San Francisco 49ers 9; Pittsburgh Steelers 21 v. BEARS 9
    2006: BEARS 41 v. San Francisco 49ers 10; New England Patriots 17 v. BEARS 13
    2007: San Diego Chargers 14 v. BEARS 3; Dallas Cowboys 34 v. BEARS 10
    2008: no opponents

    Dom Capers (an associate of 3-4 students Bill Cowher and Dick LeBeau) has taken three separate basement dwelling defensive units and flipped them into formidable forces in his first year on the job. The 3-4 defense can can prove to be exotic, dynamic and perplexing all within the same possession. What are your thoughts on Capers and his history? Any insights on how the Bears prepare themselves for the Packers new defense?

    Jim A., Parts Unknown

    A: To take your well made point a step further, the Bears are 0-6 vs. teams that implement the 3-4 defense that are not in San Francisco. I think the 49ers were running more of a hybrid 3-4 there at the time, however, because of some personnel shortages. At any rate, Capers' success has been well documented and Dan Pompei recently put together a nice story in the Tribune about it. There is a lot of work that goes into switching a defense and the key is acquiring the personnel. The Packers believe they are off to a good start after landing tackle B.J. Raji and linebacker Clay Matthews in the draft. I don't know what to say about that 2004 game with Houston, though. That meeting came at the end of a disastrous offensive season for the Bears. If you recall, Chad Hutchinson was the quarterback at the time. I think the one thing the Bears have going for themselves in this situation is new quarterback Jay Cutler. He comes from the AFC where the 3-4 has been more prevalent and he's played twice a season against one of the better 3-4 defenses in the league in San Diego.

    He's got experience against the scheme and that's going to be useful because the Bears are destined to see the best the 3-4 has to offer this season. They will see it against Pittsburgh, Baltimore, Cleveland and Arizona. So that's at least six games vs. the defense by our count. Cutler may have a better feel against the defense than Kyle Orton. If the Bears don't feel they have a lot of experience vs. it, they'll be singing a different tune after opening against the Packers and Steelers in the first two weeks. A little tidbit: teams using the 3-4 have won six of the last nine Super Bowls.

  • #2
    How did Cutler do against 3-4 defenses?
    "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
      How did Cutler do against 3-4 defenses?
      2008
      Originally posted by 3irty1
      This is museum quality stupidity.

      Comment


      • #4
        W 39-38 SD 36/50 350 4td 1 int 72% 109.6 rate
        L 7-41 NE 17/26 168y 1td 2 int 65.5% 64.3 rate
        L 17-26 mia 24/46 307y 2 td 3 int 52.2% 60.7 rate
        W 34-30 CLE 24/42 447y 3 TD 1 int 57.1% 107.9 rate
        W 34-17 JETS 27/43 357y 2 td 1 int 62.8% 94.8 rate
        L 21-52 SD 33/49 316y 1 td 2 int 67.3% 74.9 rate

        2007
        L 3-41 SD 23/36 232 0 td 1 int 63.9% 70.6 rate
        W 31-28 Pit 22/29 248 3 td 2 int 75.6% 106.7 rate
        L 3-23 SD 14/32 155y 0 td 2 int 43.8% 32.7 rate
        2006
        L 20-48 SD 17/30 188 2 td 0 int 56.7% 97.6 rate

        Won 4 Lost 6 18TD 15INT

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by pack4to84
          W 39-38 SD 36/50 350 4td 1 int 72% 109.6 rate
          L 7-41 NE 17/26 168y 1td 2 int 65.5% 64.3 rate
          L 17-26 mia 24/46 307y 2 td 3 int 52.2% 60.7 rate
          W 34-30 CLE 24/42 447y 3 TD 1 int 57.1% 107.9 rate
          W 34-17 JETS 27/43 357y 2 td 1 int 62.8% 94.8 rate
          L 21-52 SD 33/49 316y 1 td 2 int 67.3% 74.9 rate

          2007
          L 3-41 SD 23/36 232 0 td 1 int 63.9% 70.6 rate
          W 31-28 Pit 22/29 248 3 td 2 int 75.6% 106.7 rate
          L 3-23 SD 14/32 155y 0 td 2 int 43.8% 32.7 rate
          2006
          L 20-48 SD 17/30 188 2 td 0 int 56.7% 97.6 rate

          Won 4 Lost 6 18TD 15INT

          Buckets full of draft picks sure doesn't get you what it used to.

          Comment


          • #6
            To be fair, those are some good teams (except for Cleveland).
            "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

            Comment


            • #7
              Man, his QB ratings are up and down like a manic depressive.
              "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

              KYPack

              Comment


              • #8
                [quote="Scott Campbell"]
                Originally posted by pack4to84
                W 39-38 SD 36/50 350 4td 1 int 72% 109.6 rate
                L 7-41 NE 17/26 168y 1td 2 int 65.5% 64.3 rate
                L 17-26 mia 24/46 307y 2 td 3 int 52.2% 60.7 rate
                W 34-30 CLE 24/42 447y 3 TD 1 int 57.1% 107.9 rate
                W 34-17 JETS 27/43 357y 2 td 1 int 62.8% 94.8 rate
                L 21-52 SD 33/49 316y 1 td 2 int 67.3% 74.9 rate

                2007
                L 3-41 SD 23/36 232 0 td 1 int 63.9% 70.6 rate
                W 31-28 Pit 22/29 248 3 td 2 int 75.6% 106.7 rate
                L 3-23 SD 14/32 155y 0 td 2 int 43.8% 32.7 rate
                2006
                L 20-48 SD 17/30 188 2 td 0 int 56.7% 97.6 rate

                Won 4 Lost 6 18TD 15INT

                Buckets full of draft picks sure doesn't get you what it used to.[/

                quote]

                Damn straight. I remember when you could mortgage your entire next decade and get a guy like John Hadl...
                "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

                KYPack

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Fritz
                  Man, his QB ratings are up and down like a manic depressive.
                  Well that fits, as Cutler is a tad manic.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Fritz
                    Man, his QB ratings are up and down like a manic depressive.
                    And those are with good WRs too. He's downgraded in that category big time going to Chicago.
                    All hail the Ruler of the Meadow!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by pack4to84
                      W 39-38 SD 36/50 350 4td 1 int 72% 109.6 rate

                      Won 4 Lost 6 18TD 15INT
                      Or 3 wins, 6 losses and 1 game to the ref.

                      Ref or not, Cutler did play well in that game.
                      2025 Ratpickers champion.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Cutler is going to be good.. whether or not we want to admit that or not yet, he will be good.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Some say he's the next Favre.

                          Can we send some reporters down to ask him if he plans on retiring after this season?
                          [QUOTE=George Cumby] ...every draft (Ted) would pick a solid, dependable, smart, athletically limited linebacker...the guy who isn't doing drugs, going to strip bars, knocking around his girlfriend or making any plays of game changing significance.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by swede
                            Some say he's the next Favre.

                            Can we send some reporters down to ask him if he plans on retiring after this season?
                            He just might retire have a offense like Denver then going to Chicago. BF retired with WR's like Driver and Jennings. Cutler got who? can anyone name a WR thats any good for Chicago?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by swede
                              Some say he's the next Favre.

                              Can we send some reporters down to ask him if he plans on retiring after this season?
                              Wait a few years. Right now you should ask about his desire to win the game on every play, his intestines, his prescription drug use, alcohol use, any TEs he knows of that like to go hot tubbin' with the high school chicks, etc. Retirement talk is for years 9 through infinity.
                              "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X