Originally posted by mraynrand
Why should APB have to add material when these points can't really be refuted? That's not to say that the Packers would have been all that much better with Wahle - maybe another 10 win seaon. What's clear is that Sherman was trying to win with Favre before he retired. Sherman got the guy in his 10th year in 2000, with the mileage of a 15 year vet. That Favre continues to play and play reasonably well (he had a pro bowl year statistically in 2004) is a testament to the leadership of Sherman.
The article also stated:
"But Sherman kept shooting himself in the feet by trading up to land players who weren't worth the paper their contracts were printed on. "
Uhh, Sherman never had a chance to draft higher than 20, and even that was due to his moving up to get Javon Walker. Walker, along with Green, and Sherman's running attack (the best in the history of the Green Bay Packers), were the reason the Packers had a shot at the title in 2002 and 2003. If you want to blame Sherman for all the injuries in 2002, go ahead. If you want to blame him for all his decisions going sour in 2003 against Philly, go ahead. But the article fails to ackowledge just how difficult it is to maintain greatness when you draft at the bottom of the first round and the bottom of the second round, etc.
Probably the biggest factor that brought an early demise to the Packers of the 2000s (the aughts) was the blown Reynolds pick. A blue chip pro bowler at a skill position (like Walker - the Packer's best number one pick sine Sharpe), might have saved them. Think getting Richard Seymour instead of Reynolds and you'll see what I mean.
The article also stated:
"But Sherman kept shooting himself in the feet by trading up to land players who weren't worth the paper their contracts were printed on. "
Uhh, Sherman never had a chance to draft higher than 20, and even that was due to his moving up to get Javon Walker. Walker, along with Green, and Sherman's running attack (the best in the history of the Green Bay Packers), were the reason the Packers had a shot at the title in 2002 and 2003. If you want to blame Sherman for all the injuries in 2002, go ahead. If you want to blame him for all his decisions going sour in 2003 against Philly, go ahead. But the article fails to ackowledge just how difficult it is to maintain greatness when you draft at the bottom of the first round and the bottom of the second round, etc.
Probably the biggest factor that brought an early demise to the Packers of the 2000s (the aughts) was the blown Reynolds pick. A blue chip pro bowler at a skill position (like Walker - the Packer's best number one pick sine Sharpe), might have saved them. Think getting Richard Seymour instead of Reynolds and you'll see what I mean.


Comment