FAVRE: Good Vibes Thread

[woodbuck27]

And you think this is going to work better than the last one because....

Do you have hair on your chest and muscles on your forehead to fit in with your macho intimidation MJ?

[woodbuck27]

Re: Article

Good article that really says it all.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports...4482101.column

Isn't this the TRUTH?

'' He (Favre) was the runner-up to Tom Brady as the NFL's most valuable player in that 2007 season and Brett Favre played well for the Jets last year until he got hurt. ''

Question?

Is there a better candidate for the starting QB job already in Minnesota?

Should Brett Favre place loyalty to the Green Bay Packers over a consumming desire to win another Super Bowl?

Has that desire declined since he tried his best to ensure we landed Randy Moss for the 2007 season, while our esteemed GM went to sleep on that job?

Was Ted Thompson ever on the same page as Brett Favre since his arrival?

This season we may well see (finally) how it all plays out. This is really looking more and more like Favre Vs Ted Thompson. High drama indeed

[Gunakor]

Re: Article

Is there a better candidate for the starting QB job already in Minnesota?

We don't know that yet. Haven't seen Sage play yet. But I do know they don't need a top 10 QB to make that offense go, because Adrian Peterson might be the best active RB in the league and the line blocking for him ain't bad. Gus Ferrotte took them to the playoffs for crying out loud.

Should Brett Favre place loyalty to the Green Bay Packers over a consumming desire to win another Super Bowl?

No. But his loyalty to the Packers and their/his fans should be placed above his consuming hatred of Ted Thompson. Beyond that, he should make his consuming desire to win another Super Bowl the emphasis behind his return, rather than make reported comments to the contrary to his buddy Peter King.

Has that desire declined since he tried his best to ensure we landed Randy Moss for the 2007 season, while our esteemed GM went to sleep on that job?

Can't agree that he went to sleep on the WR's. So we didn't get Moss. When we didn't get Moss did TT fall asleep on the WR problem? Hell no. He fixed it and then some. New England can only wish they had a WR corps as deep as ours is.

Was Ted Thompson ever on the same page as Brett Favre since his arrival?

This is my biggest problem with the pro-Favre crowd. They think that THOMPSON should have been on FAVRE'S page. I challenge you to go to work on Monday and demand that your boss get on YOUR page. It doesn't work that way. Was Favre ever on Thompson's page? Don't you think that might have had something to do with the beef between them? The ONLY people who have to be on Brett's page are the other 10 guys in the huddle with him. Brett needs to be on the HC's page, the HC needs to be on the GM's page, etc. That's the way the ladder goes. The GM does not answer to the quarterback, nor does he take instruction on how to do his job from the quarterback. So who the hell cares if Thompson was on Favre's page?

[Bretsky]

I doubt there is a GM in the game besides maybe TT (I doubt he'd ever want to deal with him again) who would choose Sage Rosenfels over a healthy Favre to give him the best chance to win in 2010.

[woodbuck27]

Re: Article

Is there a better candidate for the starting QB job already in Minnesota?

We don't know that yet. Haven't seen Sage play yet. But I do know they don't need a top 10 QB to make that offense go, because Adrian Peterson might be the best active RB in the league and the line blocking for him ain't bad. Gus Ferrotte took them to the playoffs for crying out loud.

Should Brett Favre place loyalty to the Green Bay Packers over a consumming desire to win another Super Bowl?

No. But his loyalty to the Packers and their/his fans should be placed above his consuming hatred of Ted Thompson. Beyond that, he should make his consuming desire to win another Super Bowl the emphasis behind his return, rather than make reported comments to the contrary to his buddy Peter King.

Has that desire declined since he tried his best to ensure we landed Randy Moss for the 2007 season, while our esteemed GM went to sleep on that job?

Can't agree that he went to sleep on the WR's. So we didn't get Moss. When we didn't get Moss did TT fall asleep on the WR problem? Hell no. He fixed it and then some. New England can only wish they had a WR corps as deep as ours is.

Was Ted Thompson ever on the same page as Brett Favre since his arrival?

This is my biggest problem with the pro-Favre crowd. They think that THOMPSON should have been on FAVRE'S page. I challenge you to go to work on Monday and demand that your boss get on YOUR page. It doesn't work that way. Was Favre ever on Thompson's page? Don't you think that might have had something to do with the beef between them? The ONLY people who have to be on Brett's page are the other 10 guys in the huddle with him. Brett needs to be on the HC's page, the HC needs to be on the GM's page, etc. That's the way the ladder goes. The GM does not answer to the quarterback, nor does he take instruction on how to do his job from the quarterback. So who the hell cares if Thompson was on Favre's page?

All fine rebuttals or responses to my ?'s Gunakor.

but what is this ** about specifically please Gunakor ?

** No. But his loyalty to the Packers and their/his fans should be placed above his consuming hatred of Ted Thompson. Beyond that, he should make his consuming desire to win another Super Bowl the emphasis behind his return, rather than make reported comments to the contrary to his buddy Peter King.

[Gunakor]

Re: Article

Is there a better candidate for the starting QB job already in Minnesota?

We don't know that yet. Haven't seen Sage play yet. But I do know they don't need a top 10 QB to make that offense go, because Adrian Peterson might be the best active RB in the league and the line blocking for him ain't bad. Gus Ferrotte took them to the playoffs for crying out loud.

Should Brett Favre place loyalty to the Green Bay Packers over a consumming desire to win another Super Bowl?

No. But his loyalty to the Packers and their/his fans should be placed above his consuming hatred of Ted Thompson. Beyond that, he should make his consuming desire to win another Super Bowl the emphasis behind his return, rather than make reported comments to the contrary to his buddy Peter King.

Has that desire declined since he tried his best to ensure we landed Randy Moss for the 2007 season, while our esteemed GM went to sleep on that job?

Can't agree that he went to sleep on the WR's. So we didn't get Moss. When we didn't get Moss did TT fall asleep on the WR problem? Hell no. He fixed it and then some. New England can only wish they had a WR corps as deep as ours is.

Was Ted Thompson ever on the same page as Brett Favre since his arrival?

This is my biggest problem with the pro-Favre crowd. They think that THOMPSON should have been on FAVRE'S page. I challenge you to go to work on Monday and demand that your boss get on YOUR page. It doesn't work that way. Was Favre ever on Thompson's page? Don't you think that might have had something to do with the beef between them? The ONLY people who have to be on Brett's page are the other 10 guys in the huddle with him. Brett needs to be on the HC's page, the HC needs to be on the GM's page, etc. That's the way the ladder goes. The GM does not answer to the quarterback, nor does he take instruction on how to do his job from the quarterback. So who the hell cares if Thompson was on Favre's page?

All fine rebuttals or responses to my ?'s Gunakor.

but what is this ** about specifically please Gunakor ?

** No. But his loyalty to the Packers and their/his fans should be placed above his consuming hatred of Ted Thompson. Beyond that, he should make his consuming desire to win another Super Bowl the emphasis behind his return, rather than make reported comments to the contrary to his buddy Peter King.

The two sentences are related.

He told Peter King that a big part of the reason for his return last season was to show up Ted Thompson. That irked his Jets teammates a bit, as it should have. You can't make the argument that it's all about his desire to win another Super Bowl when he says he's coming back for other reasons. His Jets teammates saw through the bullshit same as I and others here at PR have.

If he wants to win another Super Bowl, more power to him. Nothing wrong with that at all. But don't sit there and tell people that you want revenge and expect us to believe that you just want to win football games. I ain't buyin it.

[MJZiggy]

And you think this is going to work better than the last one because....

Do you have hair on your chest and muscles on your forehead to fit in with your macho intimidation MJ?

Could you please explain to me what it macho or intimidating about this question? Now I need hair on my chest to ask a question? Considering the train wreck that the other turned into and how this one followed right along, I think it was a valid question (which, by the way was never answered).

[Scott Campbell]

Re: Article

Has that desire declined since he tried his best to ensure we landed Randy Moss for the 2007 season, while our esteemed GM went to sleep on that job?

Our "esteemed" GM in fact won the prestigious Executive of the Year award for his work on the 07 campaign. I'm guessing the voters know a lot more about job performance criteria than you do.

[cpk1994]

Re: Article

Has that desire declined since he tried his best to ensure we landed Randy Moss for the 2007 season, while our esteemed GM went to sleep on that job?

Our "esteemed" GM in fact won the prestigious Executive of the Year award for his work on the 07 campaign. I'm guessing the voters know a lot more about job performance criteria than you do.

How dare you ruin a good rant with facts. For shame.

[Scott Campbell]

And you think this is going to work better than the last one because....

Do you have hair on your chest and muscles on your forehead to fit in with your macho intimidation MJ?

Another unprovoked personal attack - unacceptable. This helps with understanding why you've been run off from here a few times.

[MOBB DEEP]

And you think this is going to work better than the last one because....

Do you have hair on your chest and muscles on your forehead to fit in with your macho intimidation MJ?

Another unprovoked personal attack - unacceptable. This helps with understanding why you've been run off from here a few times.

dang SC, he did employ the cute smilie face

lighten up, this is the good vibrations thread 'member?

[MOBB DEEP]

hey SC (or some1 else), where the heck is madtown?

i been away for a while (as cpk says, i only surface to slurp lord favre) and dont know if he threw in the towel tryna keep this place reputable...

[Packerarcher]

Gunakor,why on earth should Brett feel any loyalty to GB? GB certainly showed Brett no loyalty. I strongly disagree with you that GB did more for Favre than he did for them. There is absolutely NO loyalty in pro sports anymore. So why blame the player?

[MOBB DEEP]

Gunakor,why on earth should Brett feel any loyalty to GB? GB certainly showed Brett no loyalty. I strongly disagree with you that GB did more for Favre than he did for them. There is absolutely NO loyalty in pro sports anymore. So why blame the player?

qft; way to go youngn

[Scott Campbell]

hey SC (or some1 else), where the heck is madtown?

i been away for a while (as cpk says, i only surface to slurp lord favre) and dont know if he threw in the towel tryna keep this place reputable...

He sold the place and vamoosed.