Tweet
Here is an interesting power ranking of the NFL teams' WR?TE corps by Comast.
-
-
Packers seem about right. #8. No Anquain Boldin, but lots of very good receivers and lots of depth."The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."
KYPack -
Ranking
To low a ranking. Finley is gonna have a bust-out year.
Comment
-
Re: Ranking
Agreed. Finley is going to come up BIG time for us. He's too physically talented NOT to. Look at how he started to come on in the second half of last season. It'll be tough for opposing teams to get someone who can cover him optimally.Originally posted by PacknutTo low a ranking. Finley is gonna have a bust-out year.Comment
-
Jennings is comparable to Boldin, but Fitzgerald is sick.Originally posted by Fritz
Look at the list, it's hard to argue. The Chargers at #5 seems a tad high. Gates is a great TE, but our WRs are better than Chambers, Jackson, and Floyd. I'd drop them back to #8. That would put us at #7. Not bad rankings though."There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted ThompsonComment
-
Were 8th here too:
GO PACKERS!** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. ThoreauComment
-
I think it's the same rankings, Woody. Both sites are using the same source.Originally posted by woodbuck27Were 8th here too:
GO PACKERS!"There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted ThompsonComment
-
I'd put us at #3 on that list, and I'd also move Houston up as a tie with us.Comment
-
I would put New England at 1 and Arizona at 2. Randy Moss makes anyone look good at QB and Wes Welker is a threat of his own. Now Joey Galloway?! I believe New England's receiving corp made Matt Cassell look waaaaay better than he really is.Comment
-
I agree, While Andre Johnson may be the best in the league right now, I think we are better than Houston 2-5 at WR. Daniels has definitely been more productive than Donald Lee though.Originally posted by Scott CampbellComment
-
Re: Ranking
I don't rightly recall Finley really coming on last season. I remember him getting some additional opportunities - and while he made a few nice plays - I also remember him disappointing me with some easy shoulda been grabs.Originally posted by PlantPage55
Felt more like 50/50, but I'd be thrilled to see him impress this season.
."Everyone's born anarchist and atheist until people start lying to them" ~ wise philosopherComment
-
Buffalo and New Orleans are also overrated here. Buffalo is way overrated, IMO. Evans and Owens have a lot of talent but we have yet to see whether they can mesh well together. The depth behind 1 and 2 in Buffalo doesn't impress me. New Orleans has a bunch of nice receivers, but for just 2009 I wouldn't take any of them over Jennings or Driver.Comment
-
Re: Ranking
Originally posted by CaptainKickass
Illustration of my previous comment - I don't feel like this qualifies as "coming on".
"Finley caught six passes for 74 yards while playing in 14 games. But he did flash in the season finale, when he caught a 3-yard touchdown and also had a 26-yard reception, one week after hauling in a 35-yard pass from Aaron Rodgers at Chicago.""Everyone's born anarchist and atheist until people start lying to them" ~ wise philosopherComment
-
Too bad I don't feal sorry for Cutler going from the 7th ranked Denver WR/TE to 27th ranked bears WR/TE or the 11th ranked Denver OL vs the bears 24th rankedComment
-
So are we rating #1 guys here or corps?
Apparently it is a list of #1 guys with a bit of consideration for the rest of the team.
And absolutely no though given to complimentary skillsets, which some teams are very good at (GB, NE), some are very bad at (Phi, Ari).
You don't need two superstars when #2 compliments #1 perfectly, #3 compliments #1 and #2 perfectly, #4 compliments #1, #2, #3 perfectly, etc..
Comment
Comment