Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

PACKER INSIDER- EARLY VIEWS OF TT'S FIRST DRAFT

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • PACKER INSIDER- EARLY VIEWS OF TT'S FIRST DRAFT

    Thompson's '05 draft might offer little help
    Posted: July 20, 2006


    Rick Braun
    E-MAIL

    Green Bay - With the beginning of training camp just a little more than a week away the Green Bay Packers sit on a precipice.

    Which way will they go in 2006?

    Will general manager Ted Thompson's two years of acquisitions pan out?

    Will new coach Mike McCarthy end up being an inspired choice or just another in a long list of coaches who didn't quite cut the mustard in the National Football League?

    If McCarthy doesn't succeed, will it be because of his failings or the failings of the players Thompson gave him?

    Safeties Nick Collins (36) and Marviel Underwood were two of 11 players drafted by Green Bay's GM Ted Thompson in 2005. Collins is a starter.

    Or, as Packer fans have to be hoping, will the Packers become one of the pleasant surprises of the league in 2006?

    Those questions will all eventually be answered, but there is so much more at stake than just what happens in the 2006 season.

    While Thompson certainly appears cool on the outside, he has to feel a certain amount of weight on his shoulders.

    He's had two drafts, two free-agent seasons and now has his own coach in place. Yes, he might still have a bit of a credit limit left on his "Sherman Card" - that's the bit of slack he can be cut after inheriting a roster that wasn't exactly stocked with impact players after former GM and coach Mike Sherman's four-season stint as the man in charge of all things Packer.

    But if the Packers are to surprise in 2006, at least a few players from Thompson's 2005 draft must step up and make an impact.

    Two players are gone from that class: Injured wide receiver Terrence Murphy and late-pick wide receiver Craig Bragg.

    In the case of Murphy, it was simply bad fortune as a neck injury and the discovery of a narrowing of the spinal column forced the Packers to waive a promising prospect.

    In the case of Bragg, well, not every draft pick makes it.

    But what might be cause for concern is what do the Packers expect out of the rest of that 2005 class this season?

    Right now they don't expect anything out of first-round pick Aaron Rodgers - at least they hope they don't have to expect anything. If Rodgers is needed, that means legendary quarterback Brett Favre has been injured. And Rodgers didn't have the kind of summer that made jaws drop in the May and June minicamps.

    Safety Nick Collins started all 16 games a year ago and is expected to continue his development. With a year under his belt, he could turn into a big-play safety, and sooner rather than later.

    But out of the rest of that class, is there really anyone expected to do big things in 2006? Right now the answer appears to be "No."

    In order, the remaining picks were: Murphy in the second round; safety Marviel Underwood in the fourth round; linebacker Brady Poppinga in the fourth round; guard Junius Coston in the fifth round; cornerback Mike Hawkins in the fifth round; defensive end Mike Montgomery in the sixth round; Bragg; linebacker Kurt Campbell in the seventh round; and offensive lineman Will Whitticker in the seventh round.

    Just guessing here, but there doesn't appear to be any quick breakouts in the list.

    Underwood isn't expected to step up and win a starting spot as he remains behind Collins and free-agent prize Marquand Manuel and is no lock to beat out Mark Roman.

    Poppinga is coming off an anterior cruciate ligament injury and already will be 27 just two weeks into the season because he did the Mormon mission thing while at Brigham Young. With the drafting of A.J. Hawk and Abdul Hodge, Poppinga will have his hands full just to win a roster spot.

    Coston didn't play a down last season and now has to beat out three more linemen picked in this year's draft. If he doesn't develop quickly, he might be gone.

    Hawkins had the "raw" excuse last year. He won't get that slack this season, but he does have great athletic skills. Nonetheless, he'll have to put them on display right away.

    Montgomery has promise, but he won't be beating out Kabeer Gbaja-Biamila or Aaron Kampman in this training camp.

    Campbell missed all of last season with a knee injury, and now there's a glut at linebacker. If he wins a spot, it will be against huge odds.

    And Whitticker is penciled in as having to win a backup spot at tackle after having started all of last season at guard.

    So for now, there doesn't appear to be an awful lot of immediate help coming from the 2005 draft.

    Just guessing here, but by the end of training camp, the 11-player draft class of 2005 will be down to a class of five or six players, tops. And as of right now, only Collins looks like a starter.

    It's still early to rate the class of 2005, but one can bet Thompson will be feeling some pressure as he charts its progress in training camp.
    TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

  • #2
    Some 2005 draft comments

    Figured I'd try to get some juices stirring on this article.

    On draft day many Packer fans were quite upset about many of the picks.

    Then our Packer Homerism kicked in.

    We started believing AROD had immense talent and was overlooked by all
    We believed in TT's pick that Murhpy was by far the best available
    We believed TT found a gem in Nick Collins (and he did)
    We heard Underwood packs a big punch
    We loved Poppinga's attitude, motor, name, and work ethic
    We started praising TT for Hawkins and figured his scouts may have struck gold
    We believed we found an unrecognized gem in Coston
    We hoped for a few players between Whittaker, Campbell, and Montgomery

    IT IS NOW ONE YEAR LATER and here are my thoughts..........which will certainly be criticized by some

    I STILL HATE THE RODGERS PICK
    I STILL THINK TT NEEDED TO GO D OR OL INSTEAD OF MURPHY (while we can't fault him for the specific player becoming hurt)
    TT WAS RIGHT ON WITH COLLINS
    POPPINGA IS THE MOST OVERRATED PLAYER ON THIS FORUM; love his work eithic and motor, but not nearly the player Barnett is; special teams guy
    UNDERWOOD HAS SHOWN NOTHING
    HAWKINGS LOOKS MUCH BETTER W/O PADS THAN WITH THEM AND I WONDER IF WE DRAFTED A GREAT ATHLETE THAT CAN'T PLAY FOOTBALL
    COSTON IS NOTHING TO GET EXCITED ABOUT
    WHITTAKER HAS BACKUP TALENT AT BEST
    MONTGOMERY LOOKS GOOD ENOUGH TO BE IN THE DL ROTATION
    CAMPBELL WILL BE LUCKY TO MAKE THE ROSTER
    FINAL JUDGEMENT

    At this point in the 2005 draft, TT used 10 picks to get one solid Safety for many years to come, one role player, and a couple special teamers.

    At this point to me that's not acceptable and he definitely gets a below average grade in Draft #1.
    TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

    Comment


    • #3
      I just don't think you can judge a draft after one year. Obviously Murphy was a big loss. However, I think people are being too quick to write off Poppinga, Coston and Hawkins. I still think Coston has a legitimate shot at a starting position, and Poppinga will be a contriibutor on defense, although he probably won't start. Of course, this draft will always be known as the aaron Rodgers draft, so we can't really judge it until we see what we have in him. I'm neither optimistic or pessimistic. I just think more time is needed to judge this draft.
      I can't run no more
      With that lawless crowd
      While the killers in high places
      Say their prayers out loud
      But they've summoned, they've summoned up
      A thundercloud
      They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

      Comment


      • #4
        I agree more time is needed; but I'd also say at this point it's a bit of a disappointment
        TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

        Comment


        • #5
          Looking at it versus recent history for the team, its a damned good draft.
          Originally posted by 3irty1
          This is museum quality stupidity.

          Comment


          • #6
            B, agreeing that TT needed to have some o-line help out of that draft, I wonder if Murphy had been able to develop and turned into the stud WR that he promised to be, would you still have been against that pick? Which do you do, grab the next TO talent (without the attitude), or get someone who might be decent on the line or might need a couple of years to grow into a starting role? Either way, it still really is too early to judge. Let's see how the kids develop (and Grandpa Popps too).
            "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

            Comment


            • #7
              My big writeup on this was deleted with the server issues, and I don't have the time to write it up again. Boo!
              "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Some 2005 draft comments

                Originally posted by Bretsky
                Figured I'd try to get some juices stirring on this article.

                On draft day many Packer fans were quite upset about many of the picks.

                Then our Packer Homerism kicked in.

                We started believing AROD had immense talent and was overlooked by all
                We believed in TT's pick that Murhpy was by far the best available
                We believed TT found a gem in Nick Collins (and he did)
                We heard Underwood packs a big punch
                We loved Poppinga's attitude, motor, name, and work ethic
                We started praising TT for Hawkins and figured his scouts may have struck gold
                We believed we found an unrecognized gem in Coston
                We hoped for a few players between Whittaker, Campbell, and Montgomery

                IT IS NOW ONE YEAR LATER and here are my thoughts..........which will certainly be criticized by some

                I STILL HATE THE RODGERS PICK - B.

                woodbuck27:

                I havn't seen one thing that makes me, even - in a little way, believe that Aaron Rodgers will be a solid starting QB for the Packers. I don't think it will happen either as nice guys don't always finish first.That was a waste of a first round pick - my guts tell me that.

                I STILL THINK TT NEEDED TO GO D OR OL INSTEAD OF MURPHY (while we can't fault him for the specific player becoming hurt) B.

                woodbuck27:

                My hope that TT would select a DE - Justin Tuck (Giants) with his third pick not WR Terrence Murphy. I really came to like Murphy though and felt he would add strong leadership to us.Losing Terrence Murphy as it went was a brutal blow and The nod goes to TT there.

                TT WAS RIGHT ON WITH COLLINS - B.

                woodbuck27:

                Who is Nick Collins has become - look out for Nick Collins!

                He was well scouted and lost in the crowd to other teams I guess, or they wanted to wait to get him later (cheaper) in the draft. Turning out to be a solid second pick by Ted Thompson so far.

                POPPINGA IS THE MOST OVERRATED PLAYER ON THIS FORUM; love his work eithic and motor, but not nearly the player Barnett is; special teams guy - B.

                woodbuck27:

                Popp is a player with certain heart and desire and Iam not willing to toss him off just yet. He's a little bit of a Ray Nitschke throwback type - a little bit as Ray is my ALL TIME fav. defensive player. He certainly played well when he was in there and a leader on ST tackles. A tip of the hat to TT on this Packer also.I am certainly pulling alot for Popp.

                UNDERWOOD HAS SHOWN NOTHING - B.

                woodbuck27:

                Let's see if he can bring on the big hits that he is reputed to have in his bag of tricks? He has to step it up for sure but I see him surviving TC if he gives the effort necessary. Want to be a safety with us Marviel? Show it!

                HAWKINGS LOOKS MUCH BETTER W/O PADS THAN WITH THEM AND I WONDER IF WE DRAFTED A GREAT ATHLETE THAT CAN'T PLAY FOOTBALL - B.

                woodbuck27:

                How did you all feel about us drafting Donald Driver in the 7th round? An outstanding athlete coming to the Draft, as you'll re-call. I really was excited and again it was a gut feeling that he would produce for us.

                That is not exactly the feeling I have about Michael Hawkins but somewhat similiar. Like Underwood he has to want it but also I have a question of his ability to remain healthy enough to compete? I believe he will exceed Patrick Dendy, but maybe Dendy turns on all the Jets in TC and makes OUR five and dime.

                We have two self - proclaimed star's at CB in Harris and Woodson hopefully upgrade us, yet who can't have alot left in the tank . We may have to lock in Hawkins and Dendy for one more season. They may be in by proxy - but will they produce?

                My assessment here? TT?


                COSTON IS NOTHING TO GET EXCITED ABOUT - B.

                woodbuck27:

                This young man has alot of potential as he was a decent College player and I liked this pick.He needs time and we will allow it .He survives TC.

                OK for TT on this young Packer.

                WHITTAKER HAS BACKUP TALENT AT BEST

                woodbuck27:

                He may well be a victim of TC. I'm not at all surprised if that's the deal as he didn't step in when he had such a real shot last season but like Coston this is only season two.

                TT took him what in the 7th so will we be shocked if he fails with us? I won't be.

                MONTGOMERY LOOKS GOOD ENOUGH TO BE IN THE DL ROTATION - B.

                woodbuck27:

                We got a real chance for something special with this young Packer. I look for Montgomery to turn heads in a positive way. Otherwise why didn't TT draft at DE higher? We do have Jolly too now, a leader type - but we're discussing the success of the 2005 draft.

                CAMPBELL WILL BE LUCKY TO MAKE THE ROSTER
                FINAL JUDGEMENT

                woodbuck27:

                Yup !

                At this point in the 2005 draft, TT used 10 picks to get one solid Safety for many years to come, one role player, and a couple special teamers.

                At this point to me that's not acceptable and he definitely gets a below average grade in Draft #1.
                woodbuck27:

                In Review:

                It's certainly not looking good at all.

                I believe he should also have passed on Aaron Rodgers, as he fell that far for a reason. We are witnessing that reason, and kid yourselves all you want Packer fans. Aaron Rodgers certainly has a long long way to go, to get his head in the starting QB spot and hasn't demonstrated any consistency or the required tools. He's weak to date!

                A wasted first round pick will be the final diagnosis.

                Nick Collins looks like a stroke of Genious ! So far !!! He was well scouted.

                The rest of the drafted players - are big question marks except for Montgomery.

                The best Ted thompson gets from me for the 2005 Draft - to date is a 'D'.

                Ted Thompson may be plunging to an 'F' from me, before this season ends.

                I'm going to watch the cuts at TC very carefully, from the aspect of TT getting his way to make himself look good Versus TT placing the BEST 53-man Roster out there for us.
                ** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
                ** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
                ** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
                ** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau

                Comment


                • #9
                  If you count Murp as a possible starter I think TT had a great draft. If murp just didnt get hurt he would be starting this year and we would all be givig TT praise that he got two new starter out of his first draft after only one year. And if A-rod turns out to be good then his first three picks were all hits. Any time you get three starters in draft I would say that its a good draft, but as many have said we still need time to see what A-rod does.
                  Draft Brandin Cooks WR OSU!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Zool
                    Looking at it versus recent history for the team, its a damned good draft.
                    If we are going to set recent history as the norm our expectations are way too low
                    TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by MJZiggy
                      B, agreeing that TT needed to have some o-line help out of that draft, I wonder if Murphy had been able to develop and turned into the stud WR that he promised to be, would you still have been against that pick? Which do you do, grab the next TO talent (without the attitude), or get someone who might be decent on the line or might need a couple of years to grow into a starting role? Either way, it still really is too early to judge. Let's see how the kids develop (and Grandpa Popps too).

                      I love any Packer, but regarding your first scenario I don't think anybody thought Murphy had star talent; he was a solid deal with a great attitude. I wanted D; beyond that I'd have preferred OL.
                      TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
                        My big writeup on this was deleted with the server issues, and I don't have the time to write it up again. Boo!
                        Actually Harv the thread was deleted. BUT I took the time to rewrite my entire commentay so get off your @ss and argue something
                        TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by PaCkFan_n_MD
                          If you count Murp as a possible starter I think TT had a great draft. If murp just didnt get hurt he would be starting this year and we would all be givig TT praise that he got two new starter out of his first draft after only one year. And if A-rod turns out to be good then his first three picks were all hits. Any time you get three starters in draft I would say that its a good draft, but as many have said we still need time to see what A-rod does.
                          First off, you can't assume Murphy was turning out so no way can you say first three picks were all hits. He's a non entity we look passed.

                          Bottom line is right now we have one starter out of 10 pick.
                          TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I think circumstances make the '05 draft very difficult to judge. Murphy and Rodgers skew counting the number of players the draft put on the field.

                            Murphy certainly had potential to be a starter - he was getting looks from Favre, and the way Fergy blew up, I think he would've seen more balls as the season went on. Who's to say how he would've handled them.

                            He got (13?) starts out of a 7th round pick - no flies on that even if the guy never plays another down. Even if we don't like him much now.

                            I didn't like the A-Rod pick, but it was good value for that spot. Teams spend years and lot of picks going through QB prospects. I doubt there is a team in the league who hasn't drafted a QB in the first round in the last decade, only to have him fail. If this was one of ours, so be it.

                            If Montgomery gets significant time at DE, and most here think he will (no way he's a starter, even if he plays starter minutes) and Popinga becomes a role player I think this draft was fine. Not fabulous, but certainly not terrible either.
                            --
                            Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              "He got (13?) starts out of a 7th round pick - no flies on that even if the guy never plays another down. Even if we don't like him much now. "


                              ON ONE HAND this is a valid point.

                              On another hand this serves as a perfect example to back up Tank's belief that TT is doing a crap job.

                              Will Whittaker was a terrible terrible starter....amongst the worst in the NFL

                              How could Green Bay be in such a dire situation where it leaves itself to accepting this type of starting performance out of a rookie ???

                              Because we had no other options.

                              HMMMMMMMMMMM

                              I just hope we are not saying the same thing out of our OG position one year from now.

                              Maybe I'm stirring up a fire too early.....or.....Maybe TT should be doing more.


                              Cheers,
                              B
                              TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X