Originally posted by MadtownPacker
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Urlacher said that Cutler is a.........
Collapse
X
-
Sad is running back the opening kickoff of the Superbowl for a TD and thinking it is over only to have your parade rained on (literally).Originally posted by DabaddestbearAww, I knew it was only a matter of time before the crybaby SadTown came along to still talk about ANYTHING BUT football. Ready when you are guys.
Unless something has changed you are here to entertain us and upkeep the stereotype of ignorant bear fans. But if you want my opinion on YOUR chicago bears I think they will not be so good this season. I even wonder if the lions come in 3rd instead. Cutler has never shown that he can carry his team. In denver cutler had brandon marshall to make plays plus a strong running game yearly. You traded away your marshall in berrian. Everyone knows hester is not a #1 WR so what do you got?
Comment
-
I am responding only to have this quote locked in forever...lol.Originally posted by MadtownPackerSad is running back the opening kickoff of the Superbowl for a TD and thinking it is over only to have your parade rained on (literally).Originally posted by DabaddestbearAww, I knew it was only a matter of time before the crybaby SadTown came along to still talk about ANYTHING BUT football. Ready when you are guys.
Unless something has changed you are here to entertain us and upkeep the stereotype of ignorant bear fans. But if you want my opinion on YOUR chicago bears I think they will not be so good this season. I even wonder if the lions come in 3rd instead. Cutler has never shown that he can carry his team. In denver cutler had brandon marshall to make plays plus a strong running game yearly. You traded away your marshall in berrian. Everyone knows hester is not a #1 WR so what do you got?
Comment
-
There's a bunch of Vikings fans with whom the posters here have zero problems with when it comes to discussing football. There is also zero namecalling, except the occasional reference to the "Queens". I think there is precendent enough to prove we are amicable to good, hard, fact-based football debate with rival fans.Originally posted by DabaddestbearI know it was BASED on a real movie, but the FACE in my avatar is FICTIONAL. Whats the sense of debating something with me that I am not going to change?
When you ready to talk football holla at me.
You come here to talk smack and offend with your internet personna and content. Absolutely nothing wrong with talking smack, but you most certainly do not come here to merely talk football.
If you did, you would be less confrontational in your cyber personna, starting with changing your (highly offensive to any terminally ill person) avatar. Defending its usage merely highlights your ignorance, BTW. It has been objectively and correctly pointed out to you by many "what the actual issue is". Yet you fail to concede the point. Despite the overwhelming eveidence against you, this certainly highlights you as being predudice and even suggests to me you are a bigot.
Now, explain to me again why anybody here with any self respect would want to discuss football with you?
Comment
-
First did you ever learn that if you choose a word to insult someone with, AT LEAST KNOW HOW TO SPELL IT. PRECENDENT? What is that? Try PRECEDENT next time smart guy. PREJUDICE NOT Predudice....and to add more to your highly intelligent insults, PERSONA, not PERSONNA( you did that one twice, so no excuse of a simple typo there). I have never had an overwhelming EVEIDENCE against me, now EVIDENCE, hmmm the court is still out on that one.Originally posted by Tarlam!There's a bunch of Vikings fans with whom the posters here have zero problems with when it comes to discussing football. There is also zero namecalling, except the occasional reference to the "Queens". I think there is precendent enough to prove we are amicable to good, hard, fact-based football debate with rival fans.Originally posted by DabaddestbearI know it was BASED on a real movie, but the FACE in my avatar is FICTIONAL. Whats the sense of debating something with me that I am not going to change?
When you ready to talk football holla at me.
You come here to talk smack and offend with your internet personna and content. Absolutely nothing wrong with talking smack, but you most certainly do not come here to merely talk football.
If you did, you would be less confrontational in your cyber personna, starting with changing your (highly offensive to any terminally ill person) avatar. Defending its usage merely highlights your ignorance, BTW. It has been objectively and correctly pointed out to you by many "what the actual issue is". Yet you fail to concede the point. Despite the overwhelming eveidence against you, this certainly highlights you as being predudice and even suggests to me you are a bigot.
Now, explain to me again why anybody here with any self respect would want to discuss football with you?
I guess your words would hold some credit where you can pull up my last 20 post and prove how I just come here to talk smack. If my avatar offends you, then close your eyes, for I have seen some on here that may offend women, children, and even animal lovers, but since they are Packer fans you look for no reason to keep complaining.
Now back to the FICTIONAL MYTH that you started this post off with saying I come here JUST TO HARASS and TALK SMACK, pull up my last 20 post or even more and lets look at the percentages.
I have had MANY on here discuss FOOTBALL with me, only the handful of whiners that are the ultimate illustration of a contradiction have a problem with me...lol. Take care kid, and move along....there's nothing to see here
Comment
-
I think it is the opposite of a factual myth.Originally posted by Tarlam!Anyone know what a fictional myth is?
It is very similar to made up fiction (to be contrasted with "factual fiction"), but with some historical component.
All of which brings to mind the saying about people in glass houses.....
Comment
-
Can't argue the logic so attack the grammar.Originally posted by DabaddestbearFirst did you ever learn that if you choose a word to insult someone with, AT LEAST KNOW HOW TO SPELL IT. PRECENDENT? What is that? Try PRECEDENT next time smart guy. PREJUDICE NOT Predudice....and to add more to your highly intelligent insults, PERSONA, not PERSONNA( you did that one twice, so no excuse of a simple typo there). I have never had an overwhelming EVEIDENCE against me, now EVIDENCE, hmmm the court is still out on that one.Originally posted by Tarlam!There's a bunch of Vikings fans with whom the posters here have zero problems with when it comes to discussing football. There is also zero namecalling, except the occasional reference to the "Queens". I think there is precendent enough to prove we are amicable to good, hard, fact-based football debate with rival fans.Originally posted by DabaddestbearI know it was BASED on a real movie, but the FACE in my avatar is FICTIONAL. Whats the sense of debating something with me that I am not going to change?
When you ready to talk football holla at me.
You come here to talk smack and offend with your internet personna and content. Absolutely nothing wrong with talking smack, but you most certainly do not come here to merely talk football.
If you did, you would be less confrontational in your cyber personna, starting with changing your (highly offensive to any terminally ill person) avatar. Defending its usage merely highlights your ignorance, BTW. It has been objectively and correctly pointed out to you by many "what the actual issue is". Yet you fail to concede the point. Despite the overwhelming eveidence against you, this certainly highlights you as being predudice and even suggests to me you are a bigot.
Now, explain to me again why anybody here with any self respect would want to discuss football with you?
I guess your words would hold some credit where you can pull up my last 20 post and prove how I just come here to talk smack. If my avatar offends you, then close your eyes, for I have seen some on here that may offend women, children, and even animal lovers, but since they are Packer fans you look for no reason to keep complaining.
Now back to the FICTIONAL MYTH that you started this post off with saying I come here JUST TO HARASS and TALK SMACK, pull up my last 20 post or even more and lets look at the percentages.
I have had MANY on here discuss FOOTBALL with me, only the handful of whiners that are the ultimate illustration of a contradiction have a problem with me...lol. Take care kid, and move along....there's nothing to see here
Tar, Fictional myth. Isn't that the Bears WR corps? Once upon a time, there was a talented kick returner that they ruined..."Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings
Comment
-
"I guess your words would hold some credit where you can pull up my last 20 post and prove how I just come here to talk smack. If my avatar offends you, then close your eyes, for I have seen some on here that may offend women, children, and even animal lovers, but since they are Packer fans you look for no reason to keep complaining. "Originally posted by MJZiggyCan't argue the logic so attack the grammar.Originally posted by DabaddestbearFirst did you ever learn that if you choose a word to insult someone with, AT LEAST KNOW HOW TO SPELL IT. PRECENDENT? What is that? Try PRECEDENT next time smart guy. PREJUDICE NOT Predudice....and to add more to your highly intelligent insults, PERSONA, not PERSONNA( you did that one twice, so no excuse of a simple typo there). I have never had an overwhelming EVEIDENCE against me, now EVIDENCE, hmmm the court is still out on that one.Originally posted by Tarlam!There's a bunch of Vikings fans with whom the posters here have zero problems with when it comes to discussing football. There is also zero namecalling, except the occasional reference to the "Queens". I think there is precendent enough to prove we are amicable to good, hard, fact-based football debate with rival fans.Originally posted by DabaddestbearI know it was BASED on a real movie, but the FACE in my avatar is FICTIONAL. Whats the sense of debating something with me that I am not going to change?
When you ready to talk football holla at me.
You come here to talk smack and offend with your internet personna and content. Absolutely nothing wrong with talking smack, but you most certainly do not come here to merely talk football.
If you did, you would be less confrontational in your cyber personna, starting with changing your (highly offensive to any terminally ill person) avatar. Defending its usage merely highlights your ignorance, BTW. It has been objectively and correctly pointed out to you by many "what the actual issue is". Yet you fail to concede the point. Despite the overwhelming eveidence against you, this certainly highlights you as being predudice and even suggests to me you are a bigot.
Now, explain to me again why anybody here with any self respect would want to discuss football with you?
I guess your words would hold some credit where you can pull up my last 20 post and prove how I just come here to talk smack. If my avatar offends you, then close your eyes, for I have seen some on here that may offend women, children, and even animal lovers, but since they are Packer fans you look for no reason to keep complaining.
Now back to the FICTIONAL MYTH that you started this post off with saying I come here JUST TO HARASS and TALK SMACK, pull up my last 20 post or even more and lets look at the percentages.
I have had MANY on here discuss FOOTBALL with me, only the handful of whiners that are the ultimate illustration of a contradiction have a problem with me...lol. Take care kid, and move along....there's nothing to see here
Tar, Fictional myth. Isn't that the Bears WR corps? Once upon a time, there was a talented kick returner that they ruined...
What is it to argue if someone just chooses to make something COMPLETELY up?
I am sure that some of you are going through my old post trying to find an aha gotcha moment.... But like I said before, just saying I am a troll, and that I am always here to just talk smack doesn't necessarily make it so.
And I attack ones use of spelling because no person that has them many issues with developing their spelling skills should be wasting so much time on a message board. Go get some spelling practice books with the bright colors in it.
Comment
-
Did you mean "any" instead of "an" or perhaps "not" instead of "now"? I do not understand that sentence.Originally posted by DabaddestbearI have never had an overwhelming EVEIDENCE against me, now EVIDENCE, hmmm the court is still out on that one.
Did you mean "20 posts", or is there something known as a "20 post" and we are supposed to look at your last one of those?Originally posted by DabaddestbearI guess your words would hold some credit where you can pull up my last 20 post and prove how I just come here to talk smack.
Now back to the FICTIONAL MYTH that you started this post off with saying I come here JUST TO HARASS and TALK SMACK, pull up my last 20 post or even more and lets look at the percentages.
Comment
-
Funny how you have no issue with Bearman's spellingOriginally posted by Dabaddestbear
"I guess your words would hold some credit where you can pull up my last 20 post and prove how I just come here to talk smack. If my avatar offends you, then close your eyes, for I have seen some on here that may offend women, children, and even animal lovers, but since they are Packer fans you look for no reason to keep complaining. "
What is it to argue if someone just chooses to make something COMPLETELY up?
I am sure that some of you are going through my old post trying to find an aha gotcha moment.... But like I said before, just saying I am a troll, and that I am always here to just talk smack doesn't necessarily make it so.
And I attack ones use of spelling because no person that has them many issues with developing their spelling skills should be wasting so much time on a message board. Go get some spelling practice books with the bright colors in it.
What Tar posted is not completely made up. It happens to be true. And the fact is that what the boys put in their avs is generally not using someone with a massive and fatal deformity to deride one of our own players."Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings
Comment
-
No, I meant now...Originally posted by PatlerDid you mean "not" instead of "now"?Originally posted by DabaddestbearI have never had an overwhelming EVEIDENCE against me, now EVIDENCE, hmmm the court is still out on that one.
Did you mean "20 posts", or is there something known as a "20 post" and we are supposed to look at your last one of those?Originally posted by DabaddestbearI guess your words would hold some credit where you can pull up my last 20 post and prove how I just come here to talk smack.
Now back to the FICTIONAL MYTH that you started this post off with saying I come here JUST TO HARASS and TALK SMACK, pull up my last 20 post or even more and lets look at the percentages.
and 20 post is clear.
Do you guys ever talk football? lol
You would think that a thread with a Bears fan that has evolved into a debate about his avatar would not be leading the discussion on a Packer board after a preseason win...
Comment


Comment