Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

I'm back

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Lets look at the stats in even more depth:

    Player - Year - GS - Rec - Yds - TDs
    Jennings -'06 - 11 - 45 - 632 - 3
    J. Jones -'07 - 9 - 47 - 676 - 2
    J. Nelson -'08 - 2 - 33 - 366 - 2

    It might be easier to compare the rookie seasons of Jennings and Jones, because they played similar roles in starting quite a few games. Jennings was a starter, but missed some time too as a rookie. Jones started a lot in his rookie seasons due to injuries to both Jennings and Driver. Nelson didn't have that same opportunity, having Driver and Jennings ahead of him and healthy the whole season.

    As rookies, Jennings probably had the best opportunity to perform, being a starter but also missing a couple games. Jones started often in place of both Jennings and Driver who were dinged up in '07. Nelson had less of an opportunity, being the 3rd receiver in virtually all of '08.

    Looking strictly at their rookie performances, there is a lot to be said for Jones. Statistically, Jones outperformed Jennings as rookies, even though Jennings probably had more opportunity as the #2 receiver the entire season. Jennings hurt an ankle, which slowed him, but Jones was on the field less as a third receiver.

    I'm not suggesting that Jones will be as good as or better than Jennings. But he should have the opportunity to be a very good receiver. Nelson I think is still a little unknown. He had a "quiet" but very solid rookie season. I'm just not sure how high his ceiling is.

    Comment


    • #17
      just wondering has anybody given the thought that when James Jones was a rookie, he was the only decent WR body out there as a no. 3... when Nelson was a rookie, JJ was there and played in what 6 games??? therefore taking plays and production away from Nelson.. had Nelson been in Jones' place and been the only other decent no. 3 WR on the playing field his numbers probably would have been better...

      but just for the record i like both them sons a bitches and i'm soo f'n ready for some football!!!
      Now what y'all know about dem Texas boys
      Comin' down in candied toys, smokin' weed and talkin' noise!!!

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by BZnDallas
        just wondering has anybody given the thought that when James Jones was a rookie, he was the only decent WR body out there as a no. 3... when Nelson was a rookie, JJ was there and played in what 6 games??? therefore taking plays and production away from Nelson.. had Nelson been in Jones' place and been the only other decent no. 3 WR on the playing field his numbers probably would have been better...

        but just for the record i like both them sons a bitches and i'm soo f'n ready for some football!!!
        Good catch. However, Nelson's numbers in the games JJ missed were still pretty pedestrian.

        Comment

        Working...
        X