Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Do The Vikings Cut Jackson?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Do The Vikings Cut Jackson?

    And is so, do we sign him? Is he better than Flynn?

  • #2
    Heeeeelllllll no!
    All hail the Ruler of the Meadow!

    Comment


    • #3
      Hell fucking no. We have some dignity.

      They take our Favre and we respond by taking their Tarvaris Jackson? The sound of laughter from Minnesota would be deafening.

      Comment


      • #4
        Yes, they will cut Jackson. But not for another week at least.

        Comment


        • #5
          I wonder if he has low round trade value

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by MichiganPackerFan
            Hell fucking no. We have some dignity.

            They take our Favre and we respond by taking their Tarvaris Jackson? The sound of laughter from Minnesota would be deafening.
            Maybe the Packers can sign him, MM train him in his QB school, then trade him back to MN for a couple first round picks in a couple years!

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Patler
              Originally posted by MichiganPackerFan
              Hell fucking no. We have some dignity.

              They take our Favre and we respond by taking their Tarvaris Jackson? The sound of laughter from Minnesota would be deafening.
              Maybe the Packers can sign him, MM train him in his QB school, then trade him back to MN for a couple first round picks in a couple years!
              It did wonders for Brohm.....

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Rastak
                Originally posted by Patler
                Originally posted by MichiganPackerFan
                Hell fucking no. We have some dignity.

                They take our Favre and we respond by taking their Tarvaris Jackson? The sound of laughter from Minnesota would be deafening.
                Maybe the Packers can sign him, MM train him in his QB school, then trade him back to MN for a couple first round picks in a couple years!
                It did wonders for Brohm.....
                We prefer to use Rodgers as our poster child for MM's QB school!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Flynn>Jackson>Brohm

                  If Jackson does get cut, he knows Mn's defense and offense in and out.

                  Favre OTOH knows nothing about GB's defense and has traditionally struggled against 3-4 defenses. Heck even our offense has morphed quite a bit since his time here.

                  I think that our 2 TE look is going to be used A LOT. It is a mismatch made in heaven, Brett knows nothing about that whole portion of GB's playbook.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Patler
                    Originally posted by Rastak
                    Originally posted by Patler
                    Originally posted by MichiganPackerFan
                    Hell fucking no. We have some dignity.

                    They take our Favre and we respond by taking their Tarvaris Jackson? The sound of laughter from Minnesota would be deafening.
                    Maybe the Packers can sign him, MM train him in his QB school, then trade him back to MN for a couple first round picks in a couple years!
                    It did wonders for Brohm.....
                    We prefer to use Rodgers as our poster child for MM's QB school!
                    Nothing wrong with Flynn. That kid has a special something, and MM has worked wonders on him since Matt's been in GB.

                    I saw the greatest quote during the Packer game elsewhere at halftime last week:
                    "Aaron Rodgers will one day get to tell his grandchildren that he was the man that kept Matt Flynn on the bench."

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      They'll keep Jackson. If Childress keeps his job, he'll need somebody (next year, after Favre retires again) to tutor as only he can.

                      Let the jokes about waiving Booty begin...

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Waldo
                        Originally posted by Patler
                        Originally posted by Rastak
                        Originally posted by Patler
                        Originally posted by MichiganPackerFan
                        Hell fucking no. We have some dignity.

                        They take our Favre and we respond by taking their Tarvaris Jackson? The sound of laughter from Minnesota would be deafening.
                        Maybe the Packers can sign him, MM train him in his QB school, then trade him back to MN for a couple first round picks in a couple years!
                        It did wonders for Brohm.....
                        We prefer to use Rodgers as our poster child for MM's QB school!
                        Nothing wrong with Flynn. That kid has a special something, and MM has worked wonders on him since Matt's been in GB.

                        I saw the greatest quote during the Packer game elsewhere at halftime last week:
                        "Aaron Rodgers will one day get to tell his grandchildren that he was the man that kept Matt Flynn on the bench."
                        I was going to mention Flynn, too; but I decided he should actually have to show something in more than a brief appearance against Cleveland to earn mention in the advertising of the school! We are very selective with our poster kids!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          They are keeping Booty. TJack has given them all he can and there's no more upside to the kid. Booty has potential.
                          All hail the Ruler of the Meadow!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by run pMc
                            They'll keep Jackson. If Childress keeps his job, he'll need somebody (next year, after Favre retires again) to tutor as only he can.

                            Let the jokes about waiving Booty begin...
                            If they do, the Packers should sign him. Then, we can tell viking fans (are you listening Ras?) that they gave up a draft pick for the right to give us Booty!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Patler
                              Originally posted by run pMc
                              They'll keep Jackson. If Childress keeps his job, he'll need somebody (next year, after Favre retires again) to tutor as only he can.

                              Let the jokes about waiving Booty begin...
                              If they do, the Packers should sign him. Then, we can tell viking fans (are you listening Ras?) that they gave up a draft pick for the right to give us Booty!

                              I doubt they cut Booty but you never know!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X