Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Team who might trade for a center.....

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Team who might trade for a center.....

    The Seattle Chicken-Hawks had their starting center go down with injury, the news said he'd be out something like a couple months or better.

    I assume TT still has some connections to the Seattle front office.

    The only thing I don't know is what they might be willing to part with.


    Speculation?
    "Everyone's born anarchist and atheist until people start lying to them" ~ wise philosopher

  • #2
    It seems that teams are usually more comfortable trading draft picks than personnel, but it would be nice to find a promising young punter for one of the linemen we can't keep anyway.
    [QUOTE=George Cumby] ...every draft (Ted) would pick a solid, dependable, smart, athletically limited linebacker...the guy who isn't doing drugs, going to strip bars, knocking around his girlfriend or making any plays of game changing significance.

    Comment


    • #3
      Their center is out 4-6 weeks. Maybe we can borrow Jon Ryan back?
      Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

      Comment


      • #4
        I can't see trading Wells. He's our best OL on the bench, and our starters have the flexibility to move around. There seems to be a huge dropoff from Wells to every other backup OL (especially on the interior).
        "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
          I can't see trading Wells. He's our best OL on the bench, and our starters have the flexibility to move around. There seems to be a huge dropoff from Wells to every other backup OL (especially on the interior).
          Agree. Plus if either guard gets hurt they can slide Spitz over and bring in Wells and take only a minor step down. Keeping him on the bench would be a great move.

          Plus, from a competitive standpoint I'm sure wells isn't happy, but it must be nice to collect a multi-mil pay check and save your body.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Partial
            Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
            I can't see trading Wells. He's our best OL on the bench, and our starters have the flexibility to move around. There seems to be a huge dropoff from Wells to every other backup OL (especially on the interior).
            Agree. Plus if either guard gets hurt they can slide Spitz over and bring in Wells and take only a minor step down. Keeping him on the bench would be a great move.

            Plus, from a competitive standpoint I'm sure wells isn't happy, but it must be nice to collect a multi-mil pay check and save your body.
            \


            For players who have made it to the starter level in the NFL, I would think there are very few that would ever think its nice to get paid and I don't have to play. They have to have a huge competitive drive to get to where they are and I highly doubt they can just turn it off, unless you are Cletious Hunt
            Chris: Dad, what's the blow-hole for?
            Peter: I'll tell you what it's not for, son. And when I do, you'll understand why I can never go back to Sea World.

            Comment


            • #7
              Wells is going to play a lot. Do you remember any season where no offensive line starters missed time? Wells will come off the bench when any starter goes down, he's practically like a 6th man in the NBA.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby
                Wells is going to play a lot. Do you remember any season where no offensive line starters missed time? Wells will come off the bench when any starter goes down, he's practically like a 6th man in the NBA.
                I'm not sure he will. If Barbre is out , Giacomini probably steps in. If Colledge goes out, I think Lang may step in. If Clifton goes down, Moll might step in, or Colledge may slide out in which case Lang may replace Colledge.

                I think Wells would go in only if Spitz gets hurt or slides out to replace Sitton. They have worked Lang some at RG, but I think are more interested in keeping him on the left (perhaps as Colledge's eventual replacement when he leaves in FA. )

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
                  I can't see trading Wells. He's our best OL on the bench, and our starters have the flexibility to move around. There seems to be a huge dropoff from Wells to every other backup OL (especially on the interior).

                  The question is do you keep a guy on the roster with limited versatility, and a known ceiling in a roster spot that's usually occupied by developmental players.

                  I think the bottom 4 or 5 roster spots are not for the best players. They're for guys with the best potential.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Patler
                    I'm not sure he will. If Barbre is out , Giacomini probably steps in. If Colledge goes out, I think Lang may step in. If Clifton goes down, Moll might step in, or Colledge may slide out in which case Lang may replace Colledge.
                    Wells is much better than Giacomini or Moll, I'd be surprised if they didn't prefer to shuffle. Don't know about Lang versus Spitz at LG, but my guess is they would trust Spitz-Wells more.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
                      I can't see trading Wells. He's our best OL on the bench, and our starters have the flexibility to move around. There seems to be a huge dropoff from Wells to every other backup OL (especially on the interior).
                      I don't understand. I thought that Wells was pretty much a center and nothing else. If he doesn't start, why would you keep an OL that can only back up one position?
                      "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby
                        Originally posted by Patler
                        I'm not sure he will. If Barbre is out , Giacomini probably steps in. If Colledge goes out, I think Lang may step in. If Clifton goes down, Moll might step in, or Colledge may slide out in which case Lang may replace Colledge.
                        Wells is much better than Giacomini or Moll, I'd be surprised if they didn't prefer to shuffle. Don't know about Lang versus Spitz at LG, but my guess is they would trust Spitz-Wells more.
                        How do you shuffle to get Wells in if Barbre gets hurt? Neither Spitz nor Sitton have played out there. If you aren't going to move one of them out there, you don't need Wells to come in.

                        I'm fairly convinced that Lang will get the first chance to go in for Colledge, so any single injury on the left side will not result in Wells coming in. I think Wells is first up only if Spitz of Sitton gets hurt.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Seattle's not going to want to trade for a Center, they just drafted Unger. They'll just slide him over to the middle (which is probably his best position) while the other guy gets healthy.
                          </delurk>

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I thought MM didn't want the "shuffling" of the line anymore in an attempt to get stronger? So if a guard would get hurt, they would be replaced with a back-up, not moving Spitz over.....or did I miss understand what the "shuffling" was?
                            If you don't like me....bite me...
                            ....want some, come get some!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Ballboy
                              I thought MM didn't want the "shuffling" of the line anymore in an attempt to get stronger? So if a guard would get hurt, they would be replaced with a back-up, not moving Spitz over.....or did I miss understand what the "shuffling" was?
                              I'm not a fan of the shuffling of linemen either, but it makes sense from the standpoint that, should Sitton go down with injury for example, Wells/Spitz would be much better up front than Spitz/Lang or Spitz/Preston would be.
                              Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to grow

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X