Packers interested in Bucs QBs

[Patler]

Hmmm, I wonder if the Buccaneers could use a linebacker? Packers mentioned as interested in the last sentence of this article.

http://blogs.nfl.com/2009/08/25/bucs-listening-to-offers-for-any-qb-but-freeman/

[MichiganPackerFan]

Gruden did like to collect quarterbacks like Paris Hilton does STD's...

[CaptainKickass]

Well - it says the Packers are "monitoring", not that they've expressed interest. I'm pretty sure the Pack "monitors" way more situations as well.

Either way - I think at this point, you'd either take the young guy (Johnson)so you have an upside QB and future worth, or you take Byron to have a veteran QB that won't lose games for you.

If you go the veteran route - then I think that veteran has to be your #2 QB. I'm not sure that is how the Pack wants to roll. I think they're sold on Flynn as the # 2 and should seek a youngster who needs development as the # 3 QB.

That is as long as the Pack actually rolls with 3 QB's this season.


.

[Scott Campbell]

Re: Packers interested in Bucs QBs

Hmmm, I wonder if the Buccaneers could use a linebacker? Packers mentioned as interested in the last sentence of this article.

http://blogs.nfl.com/2009/08/25/bucs...b-but-freeman/

Did they pay Leftwich much to get him to sign there? If so, a trade for him may be out of the question.

If I'm an unemployed NFL QB looking for work, the GB situation would be pretty enticing.

[mraynrand]

If the Packers didn't pick up a veteran QB last year, I doubt they would this year, unless Flynn is hurting. But it seems they would keep tabs on the QBs that will be available following final cuts, so they can bring guys in in an emergency.

[Patler]

Well - it says the Packers are "monitoring", not that they've expressed interest. I'm pretty sure the Pack "monitors" way more situations as well.

Either way - I think at this point, you'd either take the young guy (Johnson)so you have an upside QB and future worth, or you take Byron to have a veteran QB that won't lose games for you.

If you go the veteran route - then I think that veteran has to be your #2 QB. I'm not sure that is how the Pack wants to roll. I think they're sold on Flynn as the # 2 and should seek a youngster who needs development as the # 3 QB.

That is as long as the Pack actually rolls with 3 QB's this season.


.

Well....if you are going to nitpick language, at least be accurate!
I didn't write that they expressed interest. I said they "are interested". I would say they "are interested" in any situation that they are monitoring. Doesn't mean that they will do anything about it, or even make an offer, or even discuss it with the Bucs. They may never "express" any interest to anyone at all about it.

Of more importance than your choice of words or mine:
I've often thought that we will know that the Packers truly believe they are a legitimate Super Bowl contender when they go after an experienced backup QB if they don't have one. I think they may like Flynn long term, but if they need a QB to come in to help win a critical game this season, or start for a game or two, they would probably prefer someone with experience as a starter. Like bringing in Jim McMahon when Doug Pederson wasn't yet ready or experienced enough to be relied upon.

[CaptainKickass]

Well - it says the Packers are "monitoring", not that they've expressed interest. I'm pretty sure the Pack "monitors" way more situations as well.

Either way - I think at this point, you'd either take the young guy (Johnson)so you have an upside QB and future worth, or you take Byron to have a veteran QB that won't lose games for you.

If you go the veteran route - then I think that veteran has to be your #2 QB. I'm not sure that is how the Pack wants to roll. I think they're sold on Flynn as the # 2 and should seek a youngster who needs development as the # 3 QB.

That is as long as the Pack actually rolls with 3 QB's this season.


.

Well....if you are going to nitpick language, at least be accurate!
I didn't write that they expressed interest. I said they "are interested". I would say they "are interested" in any situation that they are monitoring. Doesn't mean that they will do anything about it, or even make an offer, or even discuss it with the Bucs. They may never "express" any interest to anyone at all about it.

Of more importance than your choice of words or mine:
I've often thought that we will know that the Packers truly believe they are a legitimate Super Bowl contender when they go after an experienced backup QB if they don't have one. I think they may like Flynn long term, but if they need a QB to come in to help win a critical game this season, or start for a game or two, they would probably prefer someone with experience as a starter. Like bringing in Jim McMahon when Doug Pederson wasn't yet ready or experienced enough to be relied upon.

Totally agree.

But - the braintrust has shown willingness to be outside of normal. Some would say risky. And ironically, this is one of the characteristics that keeps me enamored with the management and coaching of our team.

.

[DonHutson]

I remember being very intrigued by Josh Johnson when he came out for the draft a couple of years ago, but I haven't paid much attention to him since then. Most likely Tampa would prefer to move the loser of the McCown/Leftwich competition.

[Pugger]

IF TT was interested in a vet QB what then do they do with Brohm? I doubt they want to cut him lose right now. He is the perfect candidate to groom for the future as is Flynn. But I can't think they'd keep 4 QBs on the roster at the end of the day...

[mraynrand]

Of more importance than your choice of words or mine:
I've often thought that we will know that the Packers truly believe they are a legitimate Super Bowl contender when they go after an experienced backup QB if they don't have one. I think they may like Flynn long term, but if they need a QB to come in to help win a critical game this season, or start for a game or two, they would probably prefer someone with experience as a starter. Like bringing in Jim McMahon when Doug Pederson wasn't yet ready or experienced enough to be relied upon.

Your theory may be correct, but it also may indicate where they are with Brohm. They could put Flynn at #3 if they can get a vet who can come in and win a few games, but they would have to be willing to say goodbye to Brohm. A third, unlikely possibility is that Flynn's stock rises enough where they think they can get a good deal for him in a trade for a future draft pick (3rd round or better), and then have vet #2 and Brohm #3.

[Fritz]

I am monitoring this thread.

I am interested.

[Fritz]

I am monitoring this thread.

I am interested.

[mraynrand]

I am monitoring this thread.

I am interested.

I am showing interest.

[cheesner]

I am monitoring this thread.

I am interested.

I am showing interest.

I have no interest. I will no longer monitor. I think the Pack has a contingency plan for injuries to every single player and monitor emergency options at every position. Probably a non-story.

Well, I must have some interest if I bothered to post . . .

[HarveyWallbangers]

Non-story. Tampa won't trade Freeman. I have read that they really like Johnson, as well. It would take a big offer to get him. Thus, it looks like they are looking to get rid of whichever veteran doesn't start, Leftwich or McCown. Leftwich would be a bad fit for our offense. He's not a WCO QB. His delivery is too slow. McCown just isn't very good. I see nothing to this story.