Originally posted by pbmax
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Charles Woodson
Collapse
X
-
Isn't that the truth. Stalking is a favourite hobby for some posters here. Too bad they couldn't combine that with some decent manners and maturity.** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau
-
Back to the wine topic......yes Ty, find out. Charles can't promote it because of NFL rules, so if it's good, at least you can promote it .Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsI could ask Toni Johnson, i would bet she was the tasting at bacchus if you really want to know.After lunch the players lounged about the hotel patio watching the surf fling white plumes high against the darkening sky. Clouds were piling up in the west… Vince Lombardi frowned.
Comment
-
Hey. It's a whole lot better due to your efforts. Congratulations.Originally posted by AdministratorBack to the topic at hand guys, enough of the insults on ALL sides.
Thanks.** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau
Comment
-
Excuse me? Go back and read the thread. It is retail on my ass for no reason. go and look at the rest of the forum...same thing.Originally posted by missionHey Ty (and associates)! You think you could try to not fuck up every other thread you feel like fucking up?
Thanks!!
Your friends,
PackerRats
Comment
-
I have called one person a name since i returned. Ask why that is. If you read the threads...he has taken a stalking interest in commenting on my posts..not the them of the thread.Originally posted by Tarlam!What he said. Ty, you really need to get a brain lift. You're sagging. Maybe you and Sheepdip can start your own forum and then you can call us all names.Originally posted by missionHey Ty (and associates)! You think you could try to not fuck up every other thread you feel like fucking up?
Thanks!!
Your friends,
PackerRats
Try and be a little objective. It will help.
Comment
-
Thank you PB for speaking the truth. I appreciate your honesty in this matter.Originally posted by pbmaxTy is not a solo act here. There are several posters who must have somehow set Google Alerts for his posts on PackerRats. Its like having rain and then weeds.Originally posted by Tarlam!What he said. Ty, you really need to get a brain lift. You're sagging. Maybe you and Sheepdip can start your own forum and then you can call us all names.Originally posted by missionHey Ty (and associates)! You think you could try to not fuck up every other thread you feel like fucking up?
Thanks!!
Your friends,
PackerRats
Posters, ask yourself if PB has an agenda. Ask yourself why he would write this.
RG has made it his personal mission to either respond to an innocuous post like i made regarding Michael Mcdonald and PB...or to mention my name derisively as he did in responding to Partail about tax advice.
Comment
-
I will email her, but i will say last time it took a month for her to respond. And, after looking at his site...the tasting was in 08..so, i wonder if she will remember....she isn't from wisco...orig from seattle, so i don't think she has the same packer fervor we do.Originally posted by HowardRoarkBack to the wine topic......yes Ty, find out. Charles can't promote it because of NFL rules, so if it's good, at least you can promote it .Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsI could ask Toni Johnson, i would bet she was the tasting at bacchus if you really want to know.
Promote: I doubt i'll even see a bottle out here. According to my research he was only putting out a 1000 cases...that is like screaming eagle territory.
I could ask the southern rep if he has seen it.
Comment
-
I'm going to say this one more time. Stop.Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsExcuse me? Go back and read the thread. It is retail on my ass for no reason. go and look at the rest of the forum...same thing.Originally posted by missionHey Ty (and associates)! You think you could try to not fuck up every other thread you feel like fucking up?
Thanks!!
Your friends,
PackerRats
I've read the exchanges over the past few days, and I want it to cease. I've talked with retailguy, but really, tyrone, you've been all over this forum "correcting people" for the past week. What you did in the game thread was ridiculous. It is indefensible.
You might find if you stop that, the rest of the "drama" that seems to follow you by multiple people will cease.
Comment
-
I posted this before you said stop. There was no intention of countering your suggestion.Originally posted by AdministratorI'm going to say this one more time. Stop.Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsExcuse me? Go back and read the thread. It is retail on my ass for no reason. go and look at the rest of the forum...same thing.Originally posted by missionHey Ty (and associates)! You think you could try to not fuck up every other thread you feel like fucking up?
Thanks!!
Your friends,
PackerRats
I've read the exchanges over the past few days, and I want it to cease. I've talked with retailguy, but really, tyrone, you've been all over this forum "correcting people" for the past week. What you did in the game thread was ridiculous. It is indefensible.
You might find if you stop that, the rest of the "drama" that seems to follow you by multiple people will cease.
I have not been on the board correcting people.
Game thread: The person i was involved with were discussing..and it was light hearted. Look at the part about being obstinate...and the joke that folllowed.
You then had Rand and RG come in long after the subject was over.
Comment
-
I posted at 5:29, you posted at 6:53, and it's pretty clear that you ignored my post and didn't post before I asked you to stop.Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
I posted this before you said stop. There was no intention of countering your suggestion.
I have not been on the board correcting people.
Game thread: The person i was involved with were discussing..and it was light hearted. Look at the part about being obstinate...and the joke that folllowed.
You then had Rand and RG come in long after the subject was over.
Are you correcting me, that you aren't correcting people? Maybe you should think about that? Your corrections are pretty clear and pretty blatent lately. Even worse than before your vacation.
My read of the game thread was not the same as yours. I don't think the other poster received your criticism in the same light hearted manner you say you meant it in.
Comment
-
Sorry. What i meant was that i didn't see your post. I was on page three reading and just responded. When i saw your post i stopped.Originally posted by AdministratorI posted at 5:29, you posted at 6:53, and it's pretty clear that you ignored my post and didn't post before I asked you to stop.Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
I posted this before you said stop. There was no intention of countering your suggestion.
I have not been on the board correcting people.
Game thread: The person i was involved with were discussing..and it was light hearted. Look at the part about being obstinate...and the joke that folllowed.
You then had Rand and RG come in long after the subject was over.
Are you correcting me, that you aren't correcting people? Maybe you should think about that? Your corrections are pretty clear and pretty blatent lately. Even worse than before your vacation.
My read of the game thread was not the same as yours. I don't think the other poster received your criticism in the same light hearted manner you say you meant it in.
Correcting: Please give an example.
Read: Read the discussion. I say obstinate...then he says something about norwegian. Then i ask about weather...he replies. We were long past the discussion. The subject was over..and we had moved on to talking about the weather and making self deprecating jokes.
Comment
-
Why would I do this? So you can argue with me? So you can tell me what you really meant, or how I interpreted it wrong? I know how to read, and I'm generally pretty good at putting things into context. I'm really not interested in debating that.Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsSorry. What i meant was that i didn't see your post. I was on page three reading and just responded. When i saw your post i stopped.Originally posted by AdministratorI posted at 5:29, you posted at 6:53, and it's pretty clear that you ignored my post and didn't post before I asked you to stop.Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
I posted this before you said stop. There was no intention of countering your suggestion.
I have not been on the board correcting people.
Game thread: The person i was involved with were discussing..and it was light hearted. Look at the part about being obstinate...and the joke that folllowed.
You then had Rand and RG come in long after the subject was over.
Are you correcting me, that you aren't correcting people? Maybe you should think about that? Your corrections are pretty clear and pretty blatent lately. Even worse than before your vacation.
My read of the game thread was not the same as yours. I don't think the other poster received your criticism in the same light hearted manner you say you meant it in.
Correcting: Please give an example.
Read: Read the discussion. I say obstinate...then he says something about norwegian. Then i ask about weather...he replies. We were long past the discussion. The subject was over..and we had moved on to talking about the weather and making self deprecating jokes.
Just move on and figure out how to express your opinion without telling someone that they are wrong or stupid. (And you don't have to use those specific words to do that)
Comment
-
So, that i would have an example to refer to. Simple as that.Originally posted by AdministratorWhy would I do this? So you can argue with me? So you can tell me what you really meant, or how I interpreted it wrong? I know how to read, and I'm generally pretty good at putting things into context. I'm really not interested in debating that.Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsSorry. What i meant was that i didn't see your post. I was on page three reading and just responded. When i saw your post i stopped.Originally posted by AdministratorI posted at 5:29, you posted at 6:53, and it's pretty clear that you ignored my post and didn't post before I asked you to stop.Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
I posted this before you said stop. There was no intention of countering your suggestion.
I have not been on the board correcting people.
Game thread: The person i was involved with were discussing..and it was light hearted. Look at the part about being obstinate...and the joke that folllowed.
You then had Rand and RG come in long after the subject was over.
Are you correcting me, that you aren't correcting people? Maybe you should think about that? Your corrections are pretty clear and pretty blatent lately. Even worse than before your vacation.
My read of the game thread was not the same as yours. I don't think the other poster received your criticism in the same light hearted manner you say you meant it in.
Correcting: Please give an example.
Read: Read the discussion. I say obstinate...then he says something about norwegian. Then i ask about weather...he replies. We were long past the discussion. The subject was over..and we had moved on to talking about the weather and making self deprecating jokes.
Just move on and figure out how to express your opinion without telling someone that they are wrong or stupid. (And you don't have to use those specific words to do that)
All i know is that for the most part my posts were fine..until you had two posters repeatedly attack me...rand and rg. Perhaps that got me riled up.
When you have RG responding to a post with a "bullshit" image or a baby image...or you have him insulting me pointlessly like he did in the romperroom when talking to partial...and i wasn't even part of the discussion...i'm sorry, but that is going to wear on me. I came back and didn't respond to a single post of his. Go look.
Take today...i simly posted that is was mike mcdonald to pb..not noticing that gbgary had said the same thing...this is a common occurence, not something unusual...and boom, there is RG not talking about the "cut" list but about my post. It wasn't insulting to PB...he and i have had many pleasant posts and never gotten into it..and pms...yet, rg felt the need to get on my ass.
If you look, i'd bet you would find that 90% of my "bad" posts are confined to rand and RG. Past is the past, and i came back and didnt' get into it with Partial, sheep, etc. Even someone like Woodbuck who has annoyed me..i was pretty dang "nice" in our discussion regarding our former punter..and the proof was our conversation..which ended with "point taken" by him.
Brando would be another past "combatant"..yet, you have seen nothing.
I would ask that you leave the past in the past and look with fresh eyes.
Comment

Comment