Originally posted by Scott Campbell
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Official Ruvell Martin Watch Thread
Collapse
X
-
I thought so as you can't be in camp without one.Originally posted by pbmaxRuvell indeed had a contract, and it wasn't just a rookie deal since he was undrafted. Ruvell was over a $1 million, Anthony Smith was around $700k.Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsFacts. Means nothing.Originally posted by ZoolActually they picked him up before he cleared waivers. So he got his GB contract picked up.Originally posted by Tyrone Biggunsdidn't seem to stop anthony smith from signing.Originally posted by boigaRuvell's a vet now, right? So odds are good he'll be picked up after the first game to avoid the guaranteed yearly salary.
Didn't Ruvell have a contract?
1 million for Ruvell...i guess a million doesn't go as far as it use to.
Comment
-
But with Pioli running the show, and cognizant of the fact that KC isn't going to do anything this year beyond "attempt to inspire confidence that the team is on the right track", they may pick up Ruvell as a budget option. No way they're springing for Marvin Harrison, for example.Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsYou could be right, but there are better players out there right now:Originally posted by Lurker64My guess is that he ends up in Kansas City, they have a pretty dire situation at WR. Bowe is a legitimate player, but he's in the doghouse in KC for whatever reason. Bradley can play when he isn't hurt, but that's not nearly often enough. Then you've got a bunch of guys with question marks. Engram hasn't really shown he can't play but he hasn't shown yet that he can, while Copper and Lawrence pretty much are there only for their ST ability.
I mean, the Chiefs brought in Ashley Lelie for a look a few weeks ago, and I think Martin probably has more in the tank than Mr. Lelie.
Jerry Porter
Reggie Williams
Matt Jones
marvin harrison
Joe Jurevicious
Ike Hilliard
Travis Taylor
Koren Robinson
Justin McCareins
Drew Carter
Dante Hall
Then again, Ruvell may not be looking for an NFL job. He may just be hanging with his pals in Green Bay, waiting to see if an injury to a WR convinces the Packers to resign him. I mean, even if he hasn't got any money, he could probably live off of Aaron Rodgers's dime for a while.</delurk>
Comment
-
I could see them going for Matt Jones. He was starting to come on..and if he is clean, he is a nice pickup.Originally posted by Lurker64But with Pioli running the show, and cognizant of the fact that KC isn't going to do anything this year beyond "attempt to inspire confidence that the team is on the right track", they may pick up Ruvell as a budget option. No way they're springing for Marvin Harrison, for example.Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsYou could be right, but there are better players out there right now:Originally posted by Lurker64My guess is that he ends up in Kansas City, they have a pretty dire situation at WR. Bowe is a legitimate player, but he's in the doghouse in KC for whatever reason. Bradley can play when he isn't hurt, but that's not nearly often enough. Then you've got a bunch of guys with question marks. Engram hasn't really shown he can't play but he hasn't shown yet that he can, while Copper and Lawrence pretty much are there only for their ST ability.
I mean, the Chiefs brought in Ashley Lelie for a look a few weeks ago, and I think Martin probably has more in the tank than Mr. Lelie.
Jerry Porter
Reggie Williams
Matt Jones
marvin harrison
Joe Jurevicious
Ike Hilliard
Travis Taylor
Koren Robinson
Justin McCareins
Drew Carter
Dante Hall
Then again, Ruvell may not be looking for an NFL job. He may just be hanging with his pals in Green Bay, waiting to see if an injury to a WR convinces the Packers to resign him. I mean, even if he hasn't got any money, he could probably live off of Aaron Rodgers's dime for a while.
Forgot about Fergie. LOL
Who is better: Ruvell or Fergie?
Comment
-
Ty I don't think very many of those receivers are as good today as Martin. How many of those guys have floated all around? Martin has at least been a member of a veteran, talented receiving corps (one of the best in the NFL). Some of those guys couldn't hack it in some of the worst.
Comment
-
Speaking of "not looking for an NFL job", can guys still make money in the Green Bay area by being "well-liked ex-Packers"? It seems like LeRoy Butler and Gilbert Brown were making a decent living off of that, but they had better resumes than Ruvell and the economy has softened somewhat...</delurk>
Comment
-
You may not think so, but that is why you aren't in the NFL. Your talent credentials took a serious hit with Money Morency.Originally posted by PartialTy I don't think very many of those receivers are as good today as Martin. How many of those guys have floated all around? Martin has at least been a member of a veteran, talented receiving corps (one of the best in the NFL). Some of those guys couldn't hack it in some of the worst.
What does being a member have to do witih anything. Being the bench warmer doesn't mean anything, or are you advocating the Bucks run out and sign mark madsen.
Every receiver i listed is either better or has been more productive...maybe not Drew Carter.
Comment
-
50ish catches and 6 tds? How many of those guys beat those numbers last year. I'm dying to know. No excuses. I'm actually legitmiately interested because I'm too lazy to look it up.Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsYou may not think so, but that is why you aren't in the NFL. Your talent credentials took a serious hit with Money Morency.Originally posted by PartialTy I don't think very many of those receivers are as good today as Martin. How many of those guys have floated all around? Martin has at least been a member of a veteran, talented receiving corps (one of the best in the NFL). Some of those guys couldn't hack it in some of the worst.
What does being a member have to do witih anything. Being the bench warmer doesn't mean anything, or are you advocating the Bucks run out and sign mark madsen.
Every receiver i listed is either better or has been more productive...maybe not Drew Carter.
http://profootball.scout.com/a.z?s=1...3&rc=16&pid=16
How many can be a dominant run blocker like him?
UPDATE: Nevermind the wikipedia stats are wrong. They;'re listed for 2008 but they're for a career.
Comment
-
Ruvell had 50ish catches and 6 tds last year? Geez, i musta missed that. I thought he had 15 catches and 1 td.Originally posted by Partial50ish catches and 6 tds? How many of those guys beat those numbers last year. I'm dying to know. No excuses. I'm actually legitmiately interested because I'm too lazy to look it up.Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsYou may not think so, but that is why you aren't in the NFL. Your talent credentials took a serious hit with Money Morency.Originally posted by PartialTy I don't think very many of those receivers are as good today as Martin. How many of those guys have floated all around? Martin has at least been a member of a veteran, talented receiving corps (one of the best in the NFL). Some of those guys couldn't hack it in some of the worst.
What does being a member have to do witih anything. Being the bench warmer doesn't mean anything, or are you advocating the Bucks run out and sign mark madsen.
Every receiver i listed is either better or has been more productive...maybe not Drew Carter.
http://profootball.scout.com/a.z?s=1...3&rc=16&pid=16
How many can be a dominant run blocker like him?
I'm willing to bet that of the receivers i listed 80% have more career catches and tds than ruvell.
there isn't a question about harrison, porter, jones, williams, jurevicous, hilliard, taylor (may be with lions), robinson, ferguson, lelie, darrel jackson.
Question marks only for McCareins, Drew Carter, Dante Hall..the issue is most likely tds for those guys.
And calling him a dominant run blocker is hilarious. Dude, get out of programming..you make drew rosenhaus look like a piker. I'm dead serious, you need to become an agent asap.
Edit: After seeing that you didn't even know ruvell's #s and actually thought he had 50 last year...only convinces me more that you need to be an agent.
Comment

Comment