Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wrong about Chillar

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    I want to see the starting linebackers be Aaron Kampman, A.J. Hawk, Clay Matthews and Brandon Chillar.

    Do you see where I'm going? The White Curtain. The Caucasian Crunch. That would be great and its about F-ing time. Me and my militia group will have tee-shirts made. I really doubt there is an NFL team with all white linebackers.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby
      I want to see the starting linebackers be Aaron Kampman, A.J. Hawk, Clay Matthews and Brandon Chillar.

      Do you see where I'm going? The White Curtain. The Caucasian Crunch. That would be great and its about F-ing time. Me and my militia group will have tee-shirts made. I really doubt there is an NFL team with all white linebackers.
      Isn't Chillar of East Indies extraction, and hence "not a white guy in the conventional sense"?
      </delurk>

      Comment


      • #33
        Just keep him out of the sun. It's Green Bay. How hard can it be?
        "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Lurker64
          Isn't Chillar of East Indies extraction, and hence "not a white guy in the conventional sense"?
          I always thought he was Italian or something.

          Thanks for the heads up. Spencer Havner is in the wings.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Lurker64
            Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby
            I want to see the starting linebackers be Aaron Kampman, A.J. Hawk, Clay Matthews and Brandon Chillar.

            Do you see where I'm going? The White Curtain. The Caucasian Crunch. That would be great and its about F-ing time. Me and my militia group will have tee-shirts made. I really doubt there is an NFL team with all white linebackers.
            Isn't Chillar of East Indies extraction, and hence "not a white guy in the conventional sense"?
            yeah, he is definitely a "mud" person. Oi, Oi, Oi!!!!

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby
              Originally posted by Lurker64
              Isn't Chillar of East Indies extraction, and hence "not a white guy in the conventional sense"?
              I always thought he was Italian or something.

              Thanks for the heads up. Spencer Havner is in the wings.
              I dunno Harlan.

              Where does your klavern stand on people from India?

              No Whitey to be sure, but still in the Commonwealth & all that.

              Chillar is the 3rd player of Indian descent to make the NFL.

              The other two?

              Bobby Singh and Sanjay Beach.

              I just thought Sanjay had a goofy first name.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Lurker64
                Chillar is a guy who has a chance to really succeed in a defense where a smart DC will consistently put him in positions that capitalize on his strengths and minimize his weaknesses. He's quite good at what he does well, but he's quite bad at what he does poorly. Personally, he's not a guy I would feel comfortable about starting in base unless the other 6 of the front 7 are exceptional players against the run, but he should get a lot of snaps in every game this season (unless the other team is just determined not to pass).

                I would defer much more to Capers and McCarthy than to anybody on any message board as to how much he should be playing, when, and in what positions. I certainly don't think he should be starting, but I'm glad he's on the team.
                BULLSHIT for the 100th time. The man is NOT weak against the run. He played base all fucking game long. He led the team in tackles. While Hawk and Barnett were rotating Chillar was in the game. Barnett got the start as veterans respect, but chillar was the one in the game.
                The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Lurker64
                  Originally posted by bobblehead
                  Guy led the team in tackles against the bears posting 7 solo and 1 assist.
                  This is a statistic that bears a closer look. Here are Chillar's appearances in the box score:

                  2nd Quarter:
                  (14:11) M.Forte left end to CHI 27 for 8 yards (B.Chillar).
                  (4:01) G.Wolfe up the middle to CHI 31 for 4 yards (B.Chillar).
                  (3:19) J.Cutler sacked at CHI 29 for -2 yards (B.Chillar).

                  3rd Quarter:
                  (12:04) M.Forte left end to GB 39 for 7 yards (B.Chillar).
                  (11:23) M.Forte left end to GB 37 for 2 yards (B.Chillar, N.Barnett).
                  (4:34) (Shotgun) M.Forte left tackle to GB 29 for 1 yard (A.Harris, B.Chillar).

                  4th Quarter:
                  (9:20) M.Forte left end to CHI 40 for 1 yard (B.Chillar).
                  (8:00) M.Forte left tackle to GB 31 for no gain (B.Chillar).

                  I think that's not really enough to singlehandedly dispell concerns about not being great against the run. Tackling 8, 7, and 4 yards downfield are not exactly positive plays in run defense.
                  yea, on 7 carries they got 22 yards...what a pussy..oh yea, and I hardly think the left end run for 7 was his responsibility. I mean, after all, if NO ONE else made a tackle before him its obviously evidence of what again??

                  Wasn't forte supposed to be mega stud?? and when chillar was hitting him he got 22 yards...nice.
                  The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by bobblehead
                    Originally posted by Lurker64
                    Chillar is a guy who has a chance to really succeed in a defense where a smart DC will consistently put him in positions that capitalize on his strengths and minimize his weaknesses. He's quite good at what he does well, but he's quite bad at what he does poorly. Personally, he's not a guy I would feel comfortable about starting in base unless the other 6 of the front 7 are exceptional players against the run, but he should get a lot of snaps in every game this season (unless the other team is just determined not to pass).

                    I would defer much more to Capers and McCarthy than to anybody on any message board as to how much he should be playing, when, and in what positions. I certainly don't think he should be starting, but I'm glad he's on the team.
                    BULLSHIT for the 100th time. The man is NOT weak against the run. He played base all fucking game long. He led the team in tackles. While Hawk and Barnett were rotating Chillar was in the game. Barnett got the start as veterans respect, but chillar was the one in the game.
                    Dude, calm down, Lurker has transformed into Waldo mini by basically just copying everything he says. The difference in Lurker's posting style two years ago to today is night and day.

                    I'm with you 100%. Chillar looks like a very good player. He had one obvious bad play during the game, and many good ones. Very, very good game. I'm hoping Bishop can get onto the field with him. Watch out!

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Bishop is a retard that can run hard through a gap. Throw out responsibility for anything on the field and he is your guy.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Deputy Nutz
                        Bishop is a retard that can run hard through a gap. Throw out responsibility for anything on the field and he is your guy.
                        I don't know, Bedard is adament that every day of camp the two LB playmakers were Chillar and Bishop, even in every day practice. They could use somebody who can blitz and hit like he can. I like the way he approaches the game.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          You know more than Bedard.
                          "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
                            You know more than Bedard.
                            That isn't much of an accomplishment.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by bobblehead
                              Originally posted by Lurker64
                              Chillar is a guy who has a chance to really succeed in a defense where a smart DC will consistently put him in positions that capitalize on his strengths and minimize his weaknesses. He's quite good at what he does well, but he's quite bad at what he does poorly. Personally, he's not a guy I would feel comfortable about starting in base unless the other 6 of the front 7 are exceptional players against the run, but he should get a lot of snaps in every game this season (unless the other team is just determined not to pass).

                              I would defer much more to Capers and McCarthy than to anybody on any message board as to how much he should be playing, when, and in what positions. I certainly don't think he should be starting, but I'm glad he's on the team.
                              BULLSHIT for the 100th time. The man is NOT weak against the run. He played base all fucking game long. He led the team in tackles. While Hawk and Barnett were rotating Chillar was in the game. Barnett got the start as veterans respect, but chillar was the one in the game.
                              Not bull****. Chillar was not in base. We spent most of the game in nickel to counter the TEs.

                              But Chillar had a play in nickel (with Barnett I think) where a guard and one other blocker got on him and the other LBer and Chillar could not get off the block until the back was past.

                              Now everyone has bad plays, so I can't say this is par for the course, but when you see Chillar fill a gap, take on a block, disengage and make the tackle while the back is in front of him, then I will join you in asking for him to start in base. Until I see it, I trust what I saw last year. Somebody has go to stay home and plug the gap in base and I don't think that guy is Chillar.
                              Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                The way that I see it is they're trying to keep the locker room at peace and quiet loud mouths like Barnett by having Chillar sit but still play a lot of snaps. IMO he probably should be starting, especially given the lack of time Barnett has played in camp.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X