Wrong about Chillar

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Weeeee!

We have too many Vendettas here right now. We need more Charlottes.

I got no vendetta...guy gets drunk, can't take a simple rib with a fuckin smiley...and beserker.

He is like some drunk sorority girl that gets all emotional, starts crying, pukes on herself...and then fucks 3 random guys....and then the next day blames it being drunk.

[SkinBasket]

I meant this Vendetta...



She makes fiends. Charlotte makes friends.


Together they have many exciting adventures.

Monkeys, rarely bathe,
Monkeys, never save up coupons,
'Cause they have nothing to buuuuy!

[Scott Campbell]

Anyway, I wonder if Chillar is going to lose any snaps to Bishop this week.

[wist43]

Anyway, I wonder if Chillar is going to lose any snaps to Bishop this week.

I'd rather see Barnett lose snaps to Bishop...

Of course, I know that's not going to happen. The switch to the new scheme is going to require some weeding out to see who can excel in it... Chillar and Bishop have far outperformed Hawk and Barnett. Although Hawk is coming around to be at least average.

[Fritz]

I was thinking the same thing, Scott. I saw a quote early in the week in which MM said he wanted to get Bishop on the field - and he didn't mean on special teams.

Weird, isn't it, to apparently have enough linebackers who are good enough at different things that it's hard to get everyone a chance to play to their strengths? I'd like to see Bishop, too, but not if he's going to be asked to cover someone on...

[pbmax]

Weeeee!

We have too many Vendettas here right now. We need more Charlottes.

Thank you Skin. Now THAT theme song is running through my head. Way too early for that....

[SkinBasket]

tee-hee.

[pbmax]

Anyway, I wonder if Chillar is going to lose any snaps to Bishop this week.

I'd rather see Barnett lose snaps to Bishop...

Of course, I know that's not going to happen. The switch to the new scheme is going to require some weeding out to see who can excel in it... Chillar and Bishop have far outperformed Hawk and Barnett. Although Hawk is coming around to be at least average.

It is odd that Bishop has no home in any package. Whether or not one believes he should start in base or not, he clearly can be disruptive near the LOS. I think they should have played Bishop more at the Mack behind Hawk rather than Lansana (for you Ty). By having Bishop back up Chillar there all camp, they now have three guys for one slot. Only at the end of camp, probably when it became realistic Lansana was going to be on the chopping block, did Bishop get snaps at Mack.

[Fritz]

One thing I don't get: if you put a guy in to play to his strengths, aren't you tipping off the other team? If I were an opposing coach and saw Bishop in the game on a passing down, I'd have to bet that he's rushing the passer.