If you could add any single player to the Packers, from any team, who would you take? Why this person?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Add Any Player And Why
Collapse
X
-
Putting aside any potential offensive linemen I could add, I'd probably pick Maurice Jones-Drew, as he's the most complete and best (IMO) back in the league, and his running style is more conducive to a long career than some other potential "best" backs.
But after I think about it for a while, there's probably some defensive player I want more. Haloti Ngata would be a good addition, I'm not sure.</delurk>
-
Nnamdi Asomugha
A true shut down corner who you could count on to take a team's #1 wr out of the game..QB's want no part of this guy. And at 28 years old he's got some good years left.
Patrick Willis would be my next choice: only 24 years old and a real play making tackling machine.
Comment
-
1. AP: Not only adds one of the best football players, but subtracts one from our division rival.
2. An OT - one of the three Jake Long, Joe Thomas, or Ryan Clady - all three young and were very good last season. See how each has progressed and take the best of the lot. Why? Our weakest position is OL. Put whoever as RT now and move to LT next season and hope that someone steps up to shine at RT.
Comment
-
I would rather have MJD than Peterson, to be honest. Peterson is unquestionably the better runner, but I think that Jones-Drew is the better back. Jones-Drew basically has no holes in his game and he does everything well, in addition to being a very good runner, he's also elite in blitz pickup and is a great receiving threat. Peterson, on the other hand, though he's one of the two or three best runners I've ever seen, is very poor in blitz pickup, has questionable hands as a receiver, has recently had fumbling issues (though, those are correctable), and has a running style that results in him taking a considerable amount of punishment as well as being a very big target in short yardage.Originally posted by Brando19Well...the obvious pick will be Adrian Peterson...so you should have said to exclude him.
It's probably just a personality thing, but I'd rather have a back who's a 9/10 in everything you'd ask a back to do, than a back who's a 10/10 in one thing, a 6/10 in another thing, a 7/10 in a third thing, a 4/10 in another thing, etc.</delurk>
Comment
-
I don't know, Lurk. His 10/10 is more significant when most of the defenders are 9/10. I agree he could be in the top 3 all time on running skills. His one run last week had it all: Power, speed, elusiveness, and vision. It adds up to be something very difficult to stop. The Pack has enough receiving threats to worry about APs ability there.Originally posted by Lurker64I would rather have MJD than Peterson, to be honest. Peterson is unquestionably the better runner, but I think that Jones-Drew is the better back. Jones-Drew basically has no holes in his game and he does everything well, in addition to being a very good runner, he's also elite in blitz pickup and is a great receiving threat. Peterson, on the other hand, though he's one of the two or three best runners I've ever seen, is very poor in blitz pickup, has questionable hands as a receiver, has recently had fumbling issues (though, those are correctable), and has a running style that results in him taking a considerable amount of punishment as well as being a very big target in short yardage.Originally posted by Brando19Well...the obvious pick will be Adrian Peterson...so you should have said to exclude him.
It's probably just a personality thing, but I'd rather have a back who's a 9/10 in everything you'd ask a back to do, than a back who's a 10/10 in one thing, a 6/10 in another thing, a 7/10 in a third thing, a 4/10 in another thing, etc.
Comment
-
Personally I'd take Chris Johnson.
Whereas I see AD as more on an offensive engine, I see Chris as the most electric big play threat behind center currently. We have the QB and passing game that I don't see a back like AD really helping like a back like Chris would. Chris would make our play action game lethal, I think that he gives DB's the heebee jeebees more than AD does, whereas AD scares the DL and LB's more than Chris does.
Comment
-
What is your source on blitz pickup? Like Sutton he's awfully small. He's my favorite player on my 2nd favorite team but he's not anywhere close to the best imo. I would much prefer Westbrook, Peterson, and Forte. Possibly a few more.Originally posted by Lurker64I would rather have MJD than Peterson, to be honest. Peterson is unquestionably the better runner, but I think that Jones-Drew is the better back. Jones-Drew basically has no holes in his game and he does everything well, in addition to being a very good runner, he's also elite in blitz pickup and is a great receiving threat. Peterson, on the other hand, though he's one of the two or three best runners I've ever seen, is very poor in blitz pickup, has questionable hands as a receiver, has recently had fumbling issues (though, those are correctable), and has a running style that results in him taking a considerable amount of punishment as well as being a very big target in short yardage.Originally posted by Brando19Well...the obvious pick will be Adrian Peterson...so you should have said to exclude him.
It's probably just a personality thing, but I'd rather have a back who's a 9/10 in everything you'd ask a back to do, than a back who's a 10/10 in one thing, a 6/10 in another thing, a 7/10 in a third thing, a 4/10 in another thing, etc.
Comment
-
But unlike Sutton, MJD is a very, very physical player and his blocking technique is excellent.Originally posted by PartialWhat is your source on blitz pickup? Like Sutton he's awfully small.
My source? I've seen enough Jaguars games and somewhat regularly seen him making plays like this.</delurk>
Comment

Comment