Originally posted by denverYooper
Originally posted by mmmdk
Is the Pittsburgh way:
Loads of team penalties - season after season?
Pen Rank
06 Offense - Pitt 69 31
06 Offense - GB 90 20
06 Defense - Pitt 104 9
06 Defense - GB 97 12
07 Offense - Pitt 80 24
07 Offense - GB 113 4
07 Defense - Pitt 73 30
07 Defense - GB 118 1
08 Offense - Pitt 95 12
08 Offense - GB 110 2
08 Defense - Pitt 91 12
08 Defense - GB 89 14
We had more penalties in 2007 on both sides of the ball, but we also made it to the NFCG with a 13-3 record. Pittsburgh, 10-6 that year, got beat in the WC round.
In '06 and '08, we had more offensive penalties than Pittsburgh and less defensive penalties. Pittsburgh's team identity is built around having a tough D. Our team is predicated on a (hopefully) high rolling offense.
Interestingly, our team under McCarthy has scored more points when they've had more offensive penalties:
penalties points for
2006 90 301
2007 113 435
2008 110 419
And given up less points when they've had more defensive penalties:
penalties points against
2006 97 366
2007 118 291
2008 89 380
Maybe penalties are a proxy for their effort level under M3. It does seem that they were good last year at getting penalties during crucial times, but maybe those just stick out more.
Lack of preperation...or fundamentals as McCarthy puts it?
3rd and 1 = 0 yards?
Is "fix it" the Pittsburgh motto?
When it comes to the offensive line, it should be. Unfortunately for Big Ben.
Is the 3-4 as easy as 1-2-3?
Nope. In fact, I thought it was supposed to take us a year+ to really transition.
Does the Pittsburgh way emphasize winning the battle of the trenches?
Not WRT the offensive line.
Is McCarthy all or any of that? I say no! Maybe the 3-4, in time and with the right personel (mostly DL) as Dom has the reigns there.
So what is McCarthy then or is he really Pittsburgh reincarnated in Green Bay?
I think his model is a mixture. You can argue Pittsburgh for the D. But that's rational, because they are perennial heavies there. On offense, though, I think he's devising his own wco-based system.
Sure TT hired McCarthy but this ain't about TT; that's another thread.
Loads of team penalties - season after season?
Pen Rank
06 Offense - Pitt 69 31
06 Offense - GB 90 20
06 Defense - Pitt 104 9
06 Defense - GB 97 12
07 Offense - Pitt 80 24
07 Offense - GB 113 4
07 Defense - Pitt 73 30
07 Defense - GB 118 1
08 Offense - Pitt 95 12
08 Offense - GB 110 2
08 Defense - Pitt 91 12
08 Defense - GB 89 14
We had more penalties in 2007 on both sides of the ball, but we also made it to the NFCG with a 13-3 record. Pittsburgh, 10-6 that year, got beat in the WC round.
In '06 and '08, we had more offensive penalties than Pittsburgh and less defensive penalties. Pittsburgh's team identity is built around having a tough D. Our team is predicated on a (hopefully) high rolling offense.
Interestingly, our team under McCarthy has scored more points when they've had more offensive penalties:
penalties points for
2006 90 301
2007 113 435
2008 110 419
And given up less points when they've had more defensive penalties:
penalties points against
2006 97 366
2007 118 291
2008 89 380
Maybe penalties are a proxy for their effort level under M3. It does seem that they were good last year at getting penalties during crucial times, but maybe those just stick out more.
Lack of preperation...or fundamentals as McCarthy puts it?
3rd and 1 = 0 yards?
Is "fix it" the Pittsburgh motto?
When it comes to the offensive line, it should be. Unfortunately for Big Ben.
Is the 3-4 as easy as 1-2-3?
Nope. In fact, I thought it was supposed to take us a year+ to really transition.
Does the Pittsburgh way emphasize winning the battle of the trenches?
Not WRT the offensive line.
Is McCarthy all or any of that? I say no! Maybe the 3-4, in time and with the right personel (mostly DL) as Dom has the reigns there.
So what is McCarthy then or is he really Pittsburgh reincarnated in Green Bay?
I think his model is a mixture. You can argue Pittsburgh for the D. But that's rational, because they are perennial heavies there. On offense, though, I think he's devising his own wco-based system.
Sure TT hired McCarthy but this ain't about TT; that's another thread.




Comment