This morning's JSO article, which followed up on Rouse's release, contained the following lines:
"And safety Aaron Rouse finally was released by the team Wednesday. But several of his teammates had long ago figured out Rouse hadn't proved himself capable of a roster spot. As a third-round pick, however, it seemed that he was given extra time to develop.
There also are players still on the team that some players believe have not earned their spots."
There is no mention of sources, or sources inside the locker room. I'm curious how the writer knows this and in what context it was said.
It's an interesting question as to whether Rouse was given too much rope. Obviously the writer of the article thought so, or thought that some inside the organization felt this way. And Rouse seemed to suck rather hard.
On the other hand, he showed some flashes his rookie year, and safeties sometimes do take a few years to develop (Sharper is the usual example). However, the article makes it appear that somebody - coaches? players? Both? knew a while ago Rouse was not cutting it, but that Thompson would not cut him.
Not sure what to make of all this. Was Anthony Smith a better choice, and Rouse kept instead because he was a "Thompson pick"? Or is this some of that grumbling that occurs when a team lays a big egg? Or is the JSO making m ore out of this than is really there in order to stir the pot and create a buzz?
"And safety Aaron Rouse finally was released by the team Wednesday. But several of his teammates had long ago figured out Rouse hadn't proved himself capable of a roster spot. As a third-round pick, however, it seemed that he was given extra time to develop.
There also are players still on the team that some players believe have not earned their spots."
There is no mention of sources, or sources inside the locker room. I'm curious how the writer knows this and in what context it was said.
It's an interesting question as to whether Rouse was given too much rope. Obviously the writer of the article thought so, or thought that some inside the organization felt this way. And Rouse seemed to suck rather hard.
On the other hand, he showed some flashes his rookie year, and safeties sometimes do take a few years to develop (Sharper is the usual example). However, the article makes it appear that somebody - coaches? players? Both? knew a while ago Rouse was not cutting it, but that Thompson would not cut him.
Not sure what to make of all this. Was Anthony Smith a better choice, and Rouse kept instead because he was a "Thompson pick"? Or is this some of that grumbling that occurs when a team lays a big egg? Or is the JSO making m ore out of this than is really there in order to stir the pot and create a buzz?

Comment