Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

OFFICIAL Packers @ Rams game thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by BallHawk
    If we don't win by at least 2 TDs....there may be a problem.
    Expect to see full squad in temple tonite....you bitches got some atoning to do.

    Comment


    • #17
      Flynn enters for mop-up duty....the good kind of mop-up duty.

      Packers - 45
      Rams - 17

      Comment


      • #18
        The (somewhat) long-awaited NFL debut of Packers rookie defensive tackle will take place in St.
        Busting drunk drivers in Antarctica since 2006

        Comment


        • #19
          Okay, for all you "OH-my-god-they-cut-Anthony-Smith-not-Rouse" people, your man Anthony Smith, the valuable backup safety of the St. Louis Rams, who had an entire training camp to become intimate with the Packers' offensive sets . . . is inactive today.

          Inactive. I-n-a-c-t-i-v-e. He will not play. Not as a starter, not as a backup.

          What will they do if one of their starters gets hurt?

          Oh, and Mr. Chemisty is inactive, too.

          And, on the Pack side, Raji is active. Let's see if he contributes and if he can keep from making the ankle worse.

          Go Pack go!
          "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

          KYPack

          Comment


          • #20
            If Bill Cowher returns to coaching next year, should the Packers make a play for him?

            What if he wants control over personnel decisions?
            Busting drunk drivers in Antarctica since 2006

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by falco
              If Bill Cowher returns to coaching next year, should the Packers make a play for him?

              What if he wants control over personnel decisions?
              yes as a coach if he can work with Dom no on personnel decisions alone...he should have input not final say.
              Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by falco
                If Bill Cowher returns to coaching next year, should the Packers make a play for him?

                What if he wants control over personnel decisions?
                Did he GM in Pittsburg?

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by pasquale
                  Originally posted by falco
                  If Bill Cowher returns to coaching next year, should the Packers make a play for him?

                  What if he wants control over personnel decisions?
                  Did he GM in Pittsburg?
                  no

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Fritz
                    Okay, for all you "OH-my-god-they-cut-Anthony-Smith-not-Rouse" people, your man Anthony Smith, the valuable backup safety of the St. Louis Rams, who had an entire training camp to become intimate with the Packers' offensive sets . . . is inactive today.

                    Inactive. I-n-a-c-t-i-v-e. He will not play. Not as a starter, not as a backup.

                    What will they do if one of their starters gets hurt?

                    Oh, and Mr. Chemisty is inactive, too.

                    And, on the Pack side, Raji is active. Let's see if he contributes and if he can keep from making the ankle worse.

                    Go Pack go!
                    Smith: TT still sucks.

                    Mr. Chemistry chose to be inactive.

                    Ruvell, in addition to picking which team he would like to start for...now has the complete confidence of spagnuolo to decide which games he would like to play in, as well as which particular plays he would like to participate in.

                    Perhaps when either DD or Jennings becomes a dominant run blocker they too will be afforded that opportunity.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      LETS FRICKN GOOOOOO.....!!!
                      They said God has a Tim Tebow complex!

                      Brew Crew in 2011!!!

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
                        Originally posted by Fritz
                        Okay, for all you "OH-my-god-they-cut-Anthony-Smith-not-Rouse" people, your man Anthony Smith, the valuable backup safety of the St. Louis Rams, who had an entire training camp to become intimate with the Packers' offensive sets . . . is inactive today.

                        Inactive. I-n-a-c-t-i-v-e. He will not play. Not as a starter, not as a backup.

                        What will they do if one of their starters gets hurt?

                        Oh, and Mr. Chemisty is inactive, too.

                        And, on the Pack side, Raji is active. Let's see if he contributes and if he can keep from making the ankle worse.

                        Go Pack go!
                        Smith: TT still sucks.

                        Mr. Chemistry chose to be inactive.

                        Ruvell, in addition to picking which team he would like to start for...now has the complete confidence of spagnuolo to decide which games he would like to play in, as well as which particular plays he would like to participate in.

                        Perhaps when either DD or Jennings becomes a dominant run blocker they too will be afforded that opportunity.
                        and they will also put lifts in their shoes to be as tall as Martin...I mean he WAS the glue that held this team together...oh and Taco Wallace too
                        Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Tony Oday
                          Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
                          Originally posted by Fritz
                          Okay, for all you "OH-my-god-they-cut-Anthony-Smith-not-Rouse" people, your man Anthony Smith, the valuable backup safety of the St. Louis Rams, who had an entire training camp to become intimate with the Packers' offensive sets . . . is inactive today.

                          Inactive. I-n-a-c-t-i-v-e. He will not play. Not as a starter, not as a backup.

                          What will they do if one of their starters gets hurt?

                          Oh, and Mr. Chemisty is inactive, too.

                          And, on the Pack side, Raji is active. Let's see if he contributes and if he can keep from making the ankle worse.

                          Go Pack go!
                          Smith: TT still sucks.

                          Mr. Chemistry chose to be inactive.

                          Ruvell, in addition to picking which team he would like to start for...now has the complete confidence of spagnuolo to decide which games he would like to play in, as well as which particular plays he would like to participate in.

                          Perhaps when either DD or Jennings becomes a dominant run blocker they too will be afforded that opportunity.
                          and they will also put lifts in their shoes to be as tall as Martin...I mean he WAS the glue that held this team together...oh and Taco Wallace too
                          you joke, but ty clearly can see that the offense is sputtering now that ruvell is gone. coincidence? Ty thinks not.

                          The problem also is that TT drafted jennings who isn't really a pro bowler, not like Jwalk. Sherman knew how to draft pro bowl WRs.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Pack has lost 5 straight on the road... Rams have lost 12 straight - period.

                            Pack needs to key on Jackson and key ARod free from hits. If we win the turnover battle and TOP, this will be a W. We should crush this team - but it'll be closer than we think.
                            The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have.
                            Vince Lombardi

                            "Not really interested in being a spoiler or an underdog. We're the Green Bay Packers." McCarthy.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by falco
                              If Bill Cowher returns to coaching next year, should the Packers make a play for him?

                              What if he wants control over personnel decisions?
                              I really would prefer not to comment on this in this thread but . . .you set this up.

                              Perfect. Then maybe we can get our team on track; the teams head out of the sand. Both TT and MM tossed and a real football mind in Green Bay.

                              GO PACKERS!
                              ** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
                              ** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
                              ** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
                              ** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                I love kicking off and starting on D! Always a good sign and getting the ball in 2nd half is great!

                                GO PACK!
                                The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have.
                                Vince Lombardi

                                "Not really interested in being a spoiler or an underdog. We're the Green Bay Packers." McCarthy.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X