OFFICIAL Packers @ Rams game thread

[imscott72]

[quote:1b92c01842="Partial"]

They need to cut Ryan Grant after this year and move on. He is not good.

You can't be serious. F'ing ADP couldn't run behind this line..

Dead serious. Peterson would dominate behind this line, are you kidding me? Grant doesn't elude people he runs right into them. He doesn't ever break a big play, which is all Peterson does.

Peterson only has 67 yards rushing against the 49ers today so far. I think it's safe to say their line is light years better than ours.

Petereson is a second half player and makes most of his big plays on the second level by himself. Peterson runs through traffic and makes plays. He'll clear 100+ yards I'm sure.

Maybe he will, but according to you he would dominate with our OL, so why isn't he dominating with a superior OL right now?

What is your definition of dominate? He is having success. I'm not watching the game, so I have no idea about his play today. Peterson is a completely different type of runner than Grant.

Grant hits a hole and goes down on contact. Peterson hits a hole and punches the first guy who tries to make contact, then bitch slaps the second and third while galloping for a long play. I don't think Peterson's line is that much better at all personally. I think Pete makes most of his big plays himself. He's unbelievably physical and strong.

You don't think their line is much better? How many sacks has Favre taken?

Wasn't it 8 prior to today? ARod has brought at least half of the sacks on himself imo.

And, of course, all of bert's are his line's fault. You are a piece of work.

Never did I say this. I haven't watched the Vikes so I have no fucking clue. Stop with your bullshit agenda.[/quote:1b92c01842]

You are something else P...

[Partial]

I agree Clifton isn't a superb run blocker but how many LT's are? Is McKinney? I have no idea..

If you have no idea then stop arguing as though you do.

Who even brought up the OL? OL is irrelevant. Packer's OL is good enough to win. Grant sucks. That is the story.

[Sparkey]

Bush holding on the punt return. Guy is awesome man!

[falco]

even if we win this game, it does not give us much to be hopeful for.

[Gunakor]

I haven't watched the Vikes so I have no fucking clue.

That's your cue to yourself to STFU about comparing the Packer line to the Viking line. Jesus fucking Christ.

Who even brought up the line? Not me. Peterson is like Sanders in the sense he would make plays without a line in front of him. Grant's suckitude has nothing to do with the Packers line.

Grant's sucktitude has NOTHING to do with the line. Okay.

[Fosco33]

I say again - smith over bush? really??

[gbgary]

do you think we'll run on first down again?

[SkinBasket]

I haven't watched the Vikes so I have no fucking clue.

That's your cue to yourself to STFU about comparing the Packer line to the Viking line. Jesus fucking Christ.

Who even brought up the line? Not me. Peterson is like Sanders in the sense he would make plays without a line in front of him. Grant's suckitude has nothing to do with the Packers line.

I don't think Peterson's line is that much better at all personally.

That was like 5 minutes ago for fuck's sake. Take your bullshit shit-stirring somewhere else please.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

I don't think Peterson's line is that much better at all personally.

So much for calling things as they are...

They have a new center and a second year RT, don't they Ras? We have a superior left tackle in Clifton, they had a better left guard in Hutch, we have a much better center in Spitz, I don't know anything about there RG, and we both have shitty RT.

You tell me, guy.

I think Minnesota has a much better OL and I think you'd be challenged to find many that would argue with that.

Agree to disagree I guess.

Clifton is still great. I'll give you he is injured. He is much better than McKinney.

Without a doubt Hutch is better than Colledge, but Colledge is still solid. Great versus very good. I'm okay with that.

Spitz is a border-line pro-bowl player at center. He's very good and I imagine he is much better than the first year starter at center for Minne. Again, I really have no idea, though.

Sitton is a solid, big nasty RG. I don't even know who Minne's RG is so I would like to hear Ras' opinion on the matter.

Isn't Ryan Cook starting at RT and isn't he horrible? We'll see. Otherwise Phil Loadholdt the Rook is probably starting. Barbre sucks.

Ty loves how you tell it like it is regarding Arod...and then come up with doozies like Clifton is still great and better than McKinney, Spitz borderline pro bowl...yep, first year starting at center, sitton is solid...first year starting.

Key line:Again, I really have no idea, though.

[pasquale]

if you want to debate packers vs vikes OL, start a thread about it.

talk about the damn game.

[Fosco33]

TD 9ers!

[Sparkey]

Nice run by Grant. Actually stayed up after contact.

[falco]

need to keep pounding it

[PackerTimer]

I'm also watching the Vikings game right now, Vernon Davis is a beast today.

[]{ilr]3]

I agree Clifton isn't a superb run blocker but how many LT's are? Is McKinney? I have no idea..

If you have no idea then stop arguing as though you do.

Who even brought up the OL? OL is irrelevant. Packer's OL is good enough to win. Grant sucks. That is the story.

grant does what he is told to. make one cut and run down hill. i dont blame him for a shitty line and bad play calling