Nice shot on the move
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
OFFICIAL Packers @ Rams game thread
Collapse
X
-
You don't think their line is much better? How many sacks has Favre taken?Originally posted by PartialWhat is your definition of dominate? He is having success. I'm not watching the game, so I have no idea about his play today. Peterson is a completely different type of runner than Grant.Originally posted by imscott72Maybe he will, but according to you he would dominate with our OL, so why isn't he dominating with a superior OL right now?Originally posted by PartialPetereson is a second half player and makes most of his big plays on the second level by himself. Peterson runs through traffic and makes plays. He'll clear 100+ yards I'm sure.Originally posted by imscott72Peterson only has 67 yards rushing against the 49ers today so far. I think it's safe to say their line is light years better than ours.Originally posted by PartialDead serious. Peterson would dominate behind this line, are you kidding me? Grant doesn't elude people he runs right into them. He doesn't ever break a big play, which is all Peterson does.Originally posted by imscott72You can't be serious. F'ing ADP couldn't run behind this line..Originally posted by Partial
They need to cut Ryan Grant after this year and move on. He is not good.
Grant hits a hole and goes down on contact. Peterson hits a hole and punches the first guy who tries to make contact, then bitch slaps the second and third while galloping for a long play. I don't think Peterson's line is that much better at all personally. I think Pete makes most of his big plays himself. He's unbelievably physical and strong.
Comment
-
You tell me. You're the one that said he would dominate behind our line. I don't agree with you. I don't care how much skill your RB has, if the line blows then so will his stats. It's a little hard to judge Grant when the line play is so poor. When there's no blocking what's he suppose to do run through 3-4 guys there waiting for him?Originally posted by PartialWhat is your definition of dominate?Originally posted by imscott72Maybe he will, but according to you he would dominate with our OL, so why isn't he dominating with a superior OL right now?Originally posted by PartialPetereson is a second half player and makes most of his big plays on the second level by himself. Peterson runs through traffic and makes plays. He'll clear 100+ yards I'm sure.Originally posted by imscott72Peterson only has 67 yards rushing against the 49ers today so far. I think it's safe to say their line is light years better than ours.Originally posted by PartialDead serious. Peterson would dominate behind this line, are you kidding me? Grant doesn't elude people he runs right into them. He doesn't ever break a big play, which is all Peterson does.Originally posted by imscott72You can't be serious. F'ing ADP couldn't run behind this line..Originally posted by Partial
They need to cut Ryan Grant after this year and move on. He is not good.www.ccso228@twitter.com
Comment
-
Originally posted by PartialThey have a new center and a second year RT, don't they Ras? We have a superior left tackle in Clifton, they had a better left guard in Hutch, we have a much better center in Spitz, I don't know anything about there RG, and we both have shitty RT.Originally posted by GunakorSo much for calling things as they are...Originally posted by PartialI don't think Peterson's line is that much better at all personally.
You tell me, guy.
I think Minnesota has a much better OL and I think you'd be challenged to find many that would argue with that.TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER
Comment
-
Wasn't it 8 prior to today? ARod has brought at least half of the sacks on himself imo.Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsYou don't think their line is much better? How many sacks has Favre taken?Originally posted by PartialWhat is your definition of dominate? He is having success. I'm not watching the game, so I have no idea about his play today. Peterson is a completely different type of runner than Grant.Originally posted by imscott72Maybe he will, but according to you he would dominate with our OL, so why isn't he dominating with a superior OL right now?Originally posted by PartialPetereson is a second half player and makes most of his big plays on the second level by himself. Peterson runs through traffic and makes plays. He'll clear 100+ yards I'm sure.Originally posted by imscott72Peterson only has 67 yards rushing against the 49ers today so far. I think it's safe to say their line is light years better than ours.Originally posted by PartialDead serious. Peterson would dominate behind this line, are you kidding me? Grant doesn't elude people he runs right into them. He doesn't ever break a big play, which is all Peterson does.Originally posted by imscott72You can't be serious. F'ing ADP couldn't run behind this line..Originally posted by Partial
They need to cut Ryan Grant after this year and move on. He is not good.
Grant hits a hole and goes down on contact. Peterson hits a hole and punches the first guy who tries to make contact, then bitch slaps the second and third while galloping for a long play. I don't think Peterson's line is that much better at all personally. I think Pete makes most of his big plays himself. He's unbelievably physical and strong.
Comment
-
Just threw a rocket on 3rd &12 then ran down field for a pointless block.Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsBert would also dominate with our line...disregard his 13 of 28 with the superior Viking line.The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have.
Vince Lombardi
"Not really interested in being a spoiler or an underdog. We're the Green Bay Packers." McCarthy.
Comment
-
We have an inferior LT in Colledge, a below average guard in Spitz, and an average center in Wells. And that's the way it's gonna be for another month. Now you know.Originally posted by PartialThey have a new center and a second year RT, don't they Ras? We have a superior left tackle in Clifton, they had a better left guard in Hutch, we have a much better center in Spitz, I don't know anything about there RG, and we both have shitty RT.Originally posted by GunakorSo much for calling things as they are...Originally posted by PartialI don't think Peterson's line is that much better at all personally.
You tell me, guy.Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to grow
Comment

Comment