If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
And could it be true? The Packers, had they had such a medical report, would have had to disclose this information to the Jets, lest they fail him on a physical and let the world know he was wounded. Did the Jets (and now the Vikings) take a big risk? Did the Packers reject that risk?
I think that they could trade him to the Jets and play dumb.
After all, it is SOP for the new team to give a guy a thorough physical when completing a trade.
Many trades are rejected because of a failed physical.
And could it be true? The Packers, had they had such a medical report, would have had to disclose this information to the Jets, lest they fail him on a physical and let the world know he was wounded. Did the Jets (and now the Vikings) take a big risk? Did the Packers reject that risk?
I think that they could trade him to the Jets and play dumb.
After all, it is SOP for the new team to give a guy a thorough physical when completing a trade.
Many trades are rejected because of a failed physical.
Did the Jets discover it and not care?
Highly unlikely. Don't you think they gave him an MRI? You think they'd bank there season on an injured player? I just can't see that working out the way you describe.
Wow Ty, you really are sad. I don't have time to go through and address this, but it boggles the mind.
Sad, how you can take something in such an incorrect manner. I make a claim that in the name of science we need to do an experiment on the lameness of the forum assbags. Instead, you go off on a tangent about bodybuilding? How are the two related? Oye...
All this does is further show in my mind that my hypothesis might have legs to stand on.
Oh, and Ty, most people have good memories, especially when you have a search engine to back you up. I'm not impressed. Especially about you gushing over yourself.
thought you said you hadn't mentioned bodybuilding. Another lie.
Wow Ty, you really are sad. I don't have time to go through and address this, but it boggles the mind.
Sad, how you can take something in such an incorrect manner. I make a claim that in the name of science we need to do an experiment on the lameness of the forum assbags. Instead, you go off on a tangent about bodybuilding? How are the two related? Oye...
All this does is further show in my mind that my hypothesis might have legs to stand on.
Oh, and Ty, most people have good memories, especially when you have a search engine to back you up. I'm not impressed. Especially about you gushing over yourself.
thought you said you hadn't mentioned bodybuilding. Another lie.
I said where have I mentioned being into it. Mentioning something and knowing about something != being interested and practicing something.
Highly unlikely. Don't you think they gave him an MRI? You think they'd bank there season on an injured player? I just can't see that working out the way you describe.
I don't think the Jets would have rejected the trade on the basis of a torn MRI, think about it.
-In trading for Brett Favre, the Jets became the biggest story in the NFL for the first time in a decade.
-Finally having a QB to be excited about almost instantly generated a ton of jersey sales and sales of PSLs that the team was having trouble selling.
If they had rejected the Brett Favre trade after it was already announced, the backlash would have been horrible (and unlike the case with a lot of other players, we had the full court press by the press as soon as the trade was agreed to in principle).
The Jets were coming off a 4-12 year, they weren't expecting to win the superbowl. They got a player who, even if he was injured, made them a lot of money and won them some games.
I'm sure if the finding was "his rotator cuff is torn, he cannot play football this year" they would have rejected the trade. But I'm sure that if they discovered a minor tear that wouldn't really cause him any trouble this year, they would have said nothing. After all, if you trade for/sign Favre in this day and age, it's basically a one year rental.
Highly unlikely. Don't you think they gave him an MRI? You think they'd bank there season on an injured player? I just can't see that working out the way you describe.
I don't think the Jets would have rejected the trade on the basis of a torn MRI, think about it.
-In trading for Brett Favre, the Jets became the biggest story in the NFL for the first time in a decade.
-Finally having a QB to be excited about almost instantly generated a ton of jersey sales and sales of PSLs that the team was having trouble selling.
If they had rejected the Brett Favre trade after it was already announced, the backlash would have been horrible (and unlike the case with a lot of other players, we had the full court press by the press as soon as the trade was agreed to in principle).
The Jets were coming off a 4-12 year, they weren't expecting to win the superbowl. They got a player who, even if he was injured, made them a lot of money and won them some games.
I'm sure if the finding was "his rotator cuff is torn, he cannot play football this year" they would have rejected the trade. But I'm sure that if they discovered a minor tear that wouldn't really cause him any trouble this year, they would have said nothing. After all, if you trade for/sign Favre in this day and age, it's basically a one year rental.
Wow Ty, you really are sad. I don't have time to go through and address this, but it boggles the mind.
Sad, how you can take something in such an incorrect manner. I make a claim that in the name of science we need to do an experiment on the lameness of the forum assbags. Instead, you go off on a tangent about bodybuilding? How are the two related? Oye...
All this does is further show in my mind that my hypothesis might have legs to stand on.
Oh, and Ty, most people have good memories, especially when you have a search engine to back you up. I'm not impressed. Especially about you gushing over yourself.
thought you said you hadn't mentioned bodybuilding. Another lie.
I said where have I mentioned being into it. Mentioning something and knowing about something != being interested and practicing something.
Where have I ever mentioned being into body building? That shit is gay. I'm into getting strong and playing sports, not getting all fake tanned up and wearing a onesie.
You got owned. Played it like you never said anything.
Sure. Reading about it, hanging on forums, dieting, building mass...not practicing.
Wow Ty, you really are sad. I don't have time to go through and address this, but it boggles the mind.
Sad, how you can take something in such an incorrect manner. I make a claim that in the name of science we need to do an experiment on the lameness of the forum assbags. Instead, you go off on a tangent about bodybuilding? How are the two related? Oye...
All this does is further show in my mind that my hypothesis might have legs to stand on.
Oh, and Ty, most people have good memories, especially when you have a search engine to back you up. I'm not impressed. Especially about you gushing over yourself.
thought you said you hadn't mentioned bodybuilding. Another lie.
I said where have I mentioned being into it. Mentioning something and knowing about something != being interested and practicing something.
Where have I ever mentioned being into body building? That shit is gay. I'm into getting strong and playing sports, not getting all fake tanned up and wearing a onesie.
You got owned. Played it like you never said anything.
Sure. Reading about it, hanging on forums, dieting, building mass...not practicing.
Being able to determine bodyfat thru pics.
Ty that isn't the point. I was saying I'm not into body building. I don't go to competitions, etc. I'm into weight lifting.
FWIW, I still maintain that guy was a big phony. I take everything I read with a grain of salt because in all likelyhood that guy is full of it.
And it is entirely possible that the FO was looking for a way to dump Mangini while keeping their jobs.
If even if it came out at the end of the season that he had a torn rotator cuff, as long as nobody mentioned that he had it when he got there, the FO does not look bad.
But Mangini and his record look bad. And a HC switch typically accompanies a QB switch.
Wow Ty, you really are sad. I don't have time to go through and address this, but it boggles the mind.
Sad, how you can take something in such an incorrect manner. I make a claim that in the name of science we need to do an experiment on the lameness of the forum assbags. Instead, you go off on a tangent about bodybuilding? How are the two related? Oye...
All this does is further show in my mind that my hypothesis might have legs to stand on.
Oh, and Ty, most people have good memories, especially when you have a search engine to back you up. I'm not impressed. Especially about you gushing over yourself.
thought you said you hadn't mentioned bodybuilding. Another lie.
I said where have I mentioned being into it. Mentioning something and knowing about something != being interested and practicing something.
Where have I ever mentioned being into body building? That shit is gay. I'm into getting strong and playing sports, not getting all fake tanned up and wearing a onesie.
You got owned. Played it like you never said anything.
Sure. Reading about it, hanging on forums, dieting, building mass...not practicing.
Being able to determine bodyfat thru pics.
Ty that isn't the point. I was saying I'm not into body building. I don't go to competitions, etc. I'm into weight lifting.
FWIW, I still maintain that guy was a big phony. I take everything I read with a grain of salt because in all likelyhood that guy is full of it.
Splitting hairs again. You said where...not a degree. And, one doesn't have to go to shows to be into something. Do i have to go to the pack games...to prove i'm into the pack. LOL
Yeah, he was full of it.
He was working, he was cut, he had info...you not working in the field, you not in shape, etc.
Dude, i'm done with you. Just going to ignore your trolling posts.
Splitting hairs again. You said where...not a degree. And, one doesn't have to go to shows to be into something. Do i have to go to the pack games...to prove i'm into the pack. LOL
Yeah, he was full of it.
He was working, he was cut, he had info...you not working in the field, you not in shape, etc.
Dude, i'm done with you. Just going to ignore your trolling posts.
Ty, I don't see the relevance of this or your comment. Clearly my comment hit a nerve.
That said. He claims he was working. He claims he was cut. He found publicly available info.
I can say I've been to the moon. I could also come up with photographic evidence. That doesn't make it true.
Comment