Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Strategy for GB vs MN

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Bretsky
    Refer to the Patriot Game Plan; lot of high percentage routes and mix in the run here and there. The Vikings will probably own our OL against the run.

    Aaron Rodgers has to bring this win home
    Agree. Rodgers has to be a Big Time Player in a Big Time Game.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by PlantPage55
      1. I would start the game out with a flea-flicker right away.
      I really like this idea.

      I'd also like to see Arod use the pump fake. I haven't seen that from him at all if memory serves.

      Originally posted by Bossman641
      Defensively, it all comes down to slowing down AD.
      If Adrian peterson = AP, who the heck is AD?


      Originally posted by mmmdk
      Originally posted by Little Whiskey
      Originally posted by CaptainKickass
      Let's please be a bit more descriptive/creative than the 'ol "gotta stop the run" and "get the running game going".
      Score more points then they do.
      If they score 2 (very probable); we score 3!

      If they score 7; we score 8 (Crosby can't be trusted anyway).

      So there, Captain!

      Ha-ha, very funny.


      Originally posted by Partial
      Run the ball, short passes, stop run. If they can do these three things, they will win.
      Brilliant!


      - Excellent thoughts from many on what may occur. It'll be interesting to see which of these are employed during the game.

      What other wrinkles might we see?

      One wrinkle on my wish list:

      I firmly believe that our Defense will need to be the x factor to bring us a win in this game. I'd almost like to see a few 4 man fronts with BJ, Pickett, Jolly, & Jenkins. (and/or Kampman)
      That would be a formidable run stopping formation. Both BJ and Jenkins have the ability to drop into a spy/short zone coverage if the "fake-out" is needed, but I believe that that group of 4 is a better 4 man front than GB had back when we were playing the 4-3 defense.
      "Everyone's born anarchist and atheist until people start lying to them" ~ wise philosopher

      Comment


      • #33
        I'd say the Pack needs to make it high scoring early or the Vikes will wear down the Pack DL and AD eventually breaks them. Vikes will just keep pounding and not having Favre throw which means less opps for mistakes. Clear pattern from first 3 games. I think the 49er game was actually a great preparation for this game.

        Comment


        • #34
          AD = All Day

          And yes, the Packers desperately need a quick start. The Packers can not afford to fall behind and let the Viking OL wear down our DL. This is true in the secod half as well. 3rd quarters have not been good to the Packer O.
          Go PACK

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
            Originally posted by Rastak
            Yea Michael, he had some REALLY nice throws. Perfect strike to Rice, Berrian dropped a perfect throw, but he also had more than a couple really poor throws. There were 3 or 4 throw I just couldn't see Jackson or Rosenfels making including the last TD. Never would have come to that if the Vikes hadn't whiffed on a block on the halftime FG attempt and then have the ball bounce right into a 9er's hands for a 10 point swing.
            Looked like San Fran should have gotten an int return for TD before that. Not sure why it wasn't reviewed. The ball appeared to go off the receiver's arm and not the ground. Of course, if San Fran doesn't give up the punt return for a TD, they might win going away. You never know.
            Check out the safety on the goal line on the last second TD. Instead of dropping straight back he runs directly at Lewis then has to turn and chase him.
            Originally posted by 3irty1
            This is museum quality stupidity.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by mngolf19
              I'd say the Pack needs to make it high scoring early or the Vikes will wear down the Pack DL and AD eventually breaks them. Vikes will just keep pounding and not having Favre throw which means less opps for mistakes. Clear pattern from first 3 games. I think the 49er game was actually a great preparation for this game.
              This is what I was thinking. We stand a much better chance playing fast break in this game vs. trying to prove something about how tough we are. Offense needs to get after it early. Best way to nullify the Vikes D line will be for A-rod and receivers to get in a rhythm early. Mix in some runs outside of the Vikings tackles for variety, sure, but I think we really need the short passing game this week.
              When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by MOBB DEEP
                How many different threads will there be about "The Game"?
                MLM...now go work on your roman numerals.
                The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

                Comment


                • #38
                  Here's one thing Tarlam alluded to that I think will be absolutely crucial to the Packers' success:

                  Don't try to do too much. Just make sure you're carrying out you assignment.

                  In a game that gets this hyped, it might be tempting to try to do it all - block two guys, abandon your gap responsibility and try to make the play, leave your lane open on special teams to try to deliver a hit.

                  But that's what will lose you the game. If each player does his job, and trusts the other players to do their jobs, then the Packers will go a long way toward being successful.

                  This is an issue that several have mentioned in terms of Favre, although to his credit so far this year he has not fallen prey to this temptation.

                  But it will be tempting to the Packers. I would like MM to stress this point, over and over and over.

                  But he probably is anyway.

                  I just hope they can pull it off.
                  "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

                  KYPack

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    I think the Packer should attack through the air with 2 TE's, even though one may have to stay home a lot. I hope this will be Finley's coming out party (although he did pretty well against the Bengals other than the drop early). VD tore up the Vikes last week.

                    I also think they should run the ball outside away from Winfield.

                    Defensively, attack the line of scrimmage against both the run and pass, blitzing from different places on practically every down.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      The Vikings are one of the teams you must set up the run with the pass and not the other way around. Strike early and put Childress in his pass-happy mode. The O executing is the key to this one. The Queen O will get their yards but between Bert, Peeterson, and our secondary I'd expect us to win the turnover battle.
                      70% of the Earth is covered by water. The rest is covered by Al Harris.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by vince
                        I think the Packer should attack through the air with 2 TE's, even though one may have to stay home a lot. I hope this will be Finley's coming out party (although he did pretty well against the Bengals other than the drop early). VD tore up the Vikes last week.

                        I also think they should run the ball outside away from Winfield.

                        Defensively, attack the line of scrimmage against both the run and pass, blitzing from different places on practically every down.


                        Did the Vikings hire a hooker for a party boat or something?
                        "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

                        KYPack

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by Fritz
                          Originally posted by vince
                          I think the Packer should attack through the air with 2 TE's, even though one may have to stay home a lot. I hope this will be Finley's coming out party (although he did pretty well against the Bengals other than the drop early). VD tore up the Vikes last week.

                          I also think they should run the ball outside away from Winfield.

                          Defensively, attack the line of scrimmage against both the run and pass, blitzing from different places on practically every down.


                          Did the Vikings hire a hooker for a party boat or something?
                          Not since the last boat ride, at least that we've heard of.

                          But hey - they say herpes is the gift that keeps on coming back, just when you thought it was gone. Kinda like a certain NFL QB doncha' think?

                          ?
                          "Everyone's born anarchist and atheist until people start lying to them" ~ wise philosopher

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            I did get a postcard from a hooker in Minneapolis once.
                            Busting drunk drivers in Antarctica since 2006

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Well I just hope that VD rips up the Vikings this week, too.
                              "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

                              KYPack

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                I would extend the offensive playbook to include more than 1 yard dives or 40 yard bombs...but that's just me.

                                I'm getting fed up with the lack of production 8-12 yards downfield.
                                My signature has NUDITY in it...whatcha gonna do?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X