Would the Pack D be better w/Gregg Williams?

[Bretsky]

My take

Williams used Green Bay and this was his insurance.
GB liked Nolan more than Capers

Both chose to go elsewhere and we then landed the deal with Capers

All three are quality coaches

[pbmax]

My take

Williams used Green Bay and this was his insurance.
GB liked Nolan more than Capers

Both chose to go elsewhere and we then landed the deal with Capers

All three are quality coaches

There is doubt about Nolan and a contract offer, but the reporting seemed to indicate that as soon as Denver became a possibility, Nolan headed west. But the Press Gazette and JS had the Packer's interest as genuine. And first choice.

[MTPackerfan]

Didn't we also have a shot at hiring Mike Nolan who went to Denver with his 3-4 and they are the number 1 defense in teh league?

Copycat.

Sorry but I believe you, sir, are the copycat. My post was first.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Re: Would the Pack D be better w/Gregg Williams?

The Saints D is playing well in a 4-3 pressure d. Recall Williams was under strong consideration as the Packer Defensive Coordinator.

Would the Packers defense be better under Williams? Your thoughts Packers Nation.

Why Williams and not Mike Nolan?

Why not hire Mike Holmgren as offensive coordinator?

Why can't i just date supermodels?

[MJZiggy]

Re: Would the Pack D be better w/Gregg Williams?

The Saints D is playing well in a 4-3 pressure d. Recall Williams was under strong consideration as the Packer Defensive Coordinator.

Would the Packers defense be better under Williams? Your thoughts Packers Nation.

Why Williams and not Mike Nolan?

Why not hire Mike Holmgren as offensive coordinator?

Why can't i just date supermodels?

You could, but you'd be alone a lot.

[Scott Campbell]

Didn't we also have a shot at hiring Mike Nolan who went to Denver with his 3-4 and they are the number 1 defense in teh league?

Copycat.

Sorry but I believe you, sir, are the copycat. My post was first.

Only chronologically. Quit stealing my ideas before I think of them.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Re: Would the Pack D be better w/Gregg Williams?

The Saints D is playing well in a 4-3 pressure d. Recall Williams was under strong consideration as the Packer Defensive Coordinator.

Would the Packers defense be better under Williams? Your thoughts Packers Nation.

Why Williams and not Mike Nolan?

Why not hire Mike Holmgren as offensive coordinator?

Why can't i just date supermodels?

You could, but you'd be alone a lot.

And, that would be different how?

[MJZiggy]

Re: Would the Pack D be better w/Gregg Williams?

The Saints D is playing well in a 4-3 pressure d. Recall Williams was under strong consideration as the Packer Defensive Coordinator.

Would the Packers defense be better under Williams? Your thoughts Packers Nation.

Why Williams and not Mike Nolan?

Why not hire Mike Holmgren as offensive coordinator?

Why can't i just date supermodels?

You could, but you'd be alone a lot.

And, that would be different how?

You'd have an excuse?

[SnakeLH2006]

To Topic: Nope. Dom is the man. Look at the last times he joined new teams. Amazing stats. Same will be here by the end of 2009. Quote it.

[Gunakor]

Dom brought pressure against Chicago, and forced Cutler into throwing 4 INT's amidst an altogether horrible day for him. He did not bring pressure against Favre, and Favre had a career day.

I hope he understands. This defense begins and ends with pressure.

[SnakeLH2006]

Dom brought pressure against Chicago, and forced Cutler into throwing 4 INT's amidst an altogether horrible day for him. He did not bring pressure against Favre, and Favre had a career day.

I hope he understands. This defense begins and ends with pressure.

Snake's not worried. Let's worry about that putrid OLine.

Great gray beards of Zeus...Lord Favre is a god. Live and learn.

[rbaloha1]

http://www.jsonline.com/sports/63905657.html

[rbaloha1]

For Stat Freaks

http://www.jsonline.com/sports/63905657.html

[Bretsky]

Re: For Stat Freaks

http://www.jsonline.com/sports/63905657.html

VERY solid article here; it seemed pretty apparent to me that we wanted Williams as well.

But all 3 are great candidates that should find long term success

New Systems for all; takes players time to adjust obviously
but two of the three are succeeding right off the bat

So what's the big difference ? Were the Saints or Bronocs talent really much better then GB last year

So what's the difference ?


shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh hhhhhhhhhh

don't say that word to TTT

[rbaloha1]

Re: For Stat Freaks

http://www.jsonline.com/sports/63905657.html

VERY solid article here; it seemed pretty apparent to me that we wanted Williams as well.

But all 3 are great candidates that should find long term success

New Systems for all; takes players time to adjust obviously
but two of the three are succeeding right off the bat

So what's the big difference ? Were the Saints or Bronocs talent really much better then GB last year

So what's the difference ?


shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh hhhhhhhhhh

don't say that word to TTT

The question if one of the other 2 coordinators would also the Packers unbeaten.