Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

MM Was Outcoached: Gave up on the run

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • MM Was Outcoached: Gave up on the run

    Yeah, we all know we got beat down in the trenches, but was it really as simple as just getting beat? Favre didn't get pressured, but before that game he had been consistently pressured, and hit, by supposedly inferior opponents.

    What did the vikings do to rid our pressure?

    Ran the ball. They ran it even if it wasn't working.

    Adrian Peterson: 25 Carries, 55 Yards.
    Ryan Grant: 11 Carries, 51 Yards

    So they ran it despite it not working, to keep defenders off of Favre. Meanwhile, running it WAS working for GB, and we stopped doing it. How does that make any sense to anyone? MM has been known for giving up on the run way too eary in play calling, but in this on monday he failed bad. We actually COULD run the ball, and instead we just seemed to throw it on every down.

    It's getting old. Ryan Grant is not nearly as bad as people make him out to be, blame MM, who consistently takes the ball out of his hands, even when it is working.

  • #2
    I agree. I think MM gave up on the run way, way way too soon. He gave up on the run when the game was tied at 14.

    He didn't do his offensive linemen any favors with his play calling.
    "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

    KYPack

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: MM Was Outcoached: Gave up on the run

      Originally posted by packerbacker1234
      Yeah, we all know we got beat down in the trenches, but was it really as simple as just getting beat? Favre didn't get pressured, but before that game he had been consistently pressured, and hit, by supposedly inferior opponents.

      What did the vikings do to rid our pressure?

      Ran the ball. They ran it even if it wasn't working.

      Adrian Peterson: 25 Carries, 55 Yards.
      Ryan Grant: 11 Carries, 51 Yards

      So they ran it despite it not working, to keep defenders off of Favre. Meanwhile, running it WAS working for GB, and we stopped doing it. How does that make any sense to anyone? MM has been known for giving up on the run way too eary in play calling, but in this on monday he failed bad. We actually COULD run the ball, and instead we just seemed to throw it on every down.

      It's getting old. Ryan Grant is not nearly as bad as people make him out to be, blame MM, who consistently takes the ball out of his hands, even when it is working.
      Good points
      They said God has a Tim Tebow complex!

      Brew Crew in 2011!!!

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Fritz
        I agree. I think MM gave up on the run way, way way too soon. He gave up on the run when the game was tied at 14.

        He didn't do his offensive linemen any favors with his play calling.
        The Packer offense pretty much didn't touch the ball after MN went up 14-7. They got the ball back and had three pass attempts for 0,5, and sacked. Perhaps on that drive a run might have worked. Still, the next play was Matthews TD, then MN had a long drive to use up all but 30 sec in the half and then MN used up a lot of time scoring a TD at the start of the third. By the time the Packers offense got the ball again in the 3rd Quarter, they were down two TDs. McCarthy never had a chance to run the ball with the score tied.
        "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

        Comment


        • #5
          Sometimes MM acknowledges abandoning the run too quickly.

          IMO for the run to work properly A-rod needs to get in rhythm early which opens up the running lanes. Whatever happened to the draw?

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by mraynrand
            Originally posted by Fritz
            I agree. I think MM gave up on the run way, way way too soon. He gave up on the run when the game was tied at 14.

            He didn't do his offensive linemen any favors with his play calling.
            The Packer offense pretty much didn't touch the ball .after MN went up 14-7. They got the ball back and had three pass attempts for 0,5, and sacked. Perhaps on that drive a run might have worked Still, the next play was Matthews TD, then MN had a long drive to use up all but 30 sec in the half and then MN used up a lot of time scoring a TD at the start of the third. By the time the Packers offense got the ball again in the 3rd Quarter, they were down two TDs. McCarthy never had a chance to run the ball with the score tied.
            Yes, that would have been exactly the time to run the ball a little.

            I also don't know why, with over 15 minutes to play, being two touchdowns down somehow disqualifies a team from running. What, you're afraid your team might take up seven or eight minutes on a drive? So there'd be eight or nine minutes left and you're down by one touchdown, or maybe ten points?

            You don't have to get pass happy that soon. MM - in my completely expert opinion, having coached my 16 year old daughter on the finer points of powder puff football for five minutes earlier this evening - abandons the run too soon, if he ever even gives it a shot.
            "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

            KYPack

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Fritz
              Originally posted by mraynrand
              Originally posted by Fritz
              I agree. I think MM gave up on the run way, way way too soon. He gave up on the run when the game was tied at 14.

              He didn't do his offensive linemen any favors with his play calling.
              The Packer offense pretty much didn't touch the ball .after MN went up 14-7. They got the ball back and had three pass attempts for 0,5, and sacked. Perhaps on that drive a run might have worked Still, the next play was Matthews TD, then MN had a long drive to use up all but 30 sec in the half and then MN used up a lot of time scoring a TD at the start of the third. By the time the Packers offense got the ball again in the 3rd Quarter, they were down two TDs. McCarthy never had a chance to run the ball with the score tied.
              Yes, that would have been exactly the time to run the ball a little.

              I also don't know why, with over 15 minutes to play, being two touchdowns down somehow disqualifies a team from running. What, you're afraid your team might take up seven or eight minutes on a drive? So there'd be eight or nine minutes left and you're down by one touchdown, or maybe ten points?

              You don't have to get pass happy that soon. MM - in my completely expert opinion, having coached my 16 year old daughter on the finer points of powder puff football for five minutes earlier this evening - abandons the run too soon, if he ever even gives it a shot.
              Sure, mix it up. But let's look at reality: down two scores, McCarthy calls 4 runs for 10 yards not counting the QB scramble, and 9 passes with two sacks on a drive that should have resulted in a TD. Is this giving up on the run? It's not great production from the run game, but the run was in there.

              GNB MIN
              1st and 10 at GNB 18 A.Rodgers scrambles left end ran ob at GB 23 for 5 yards.
              2nd and 5 at GNB 23 A.Rodgers sacked at GB 21 for -2 yards (J.Allen).
              3rd and 7 at GNB 21 (Shotgun) A.Rodgers pass short right to J.Nelson to GB 31 for 10 yards (A.Winfield).
              1st and 10 at GNB 31 A.Rodgers pass short right to J.Nelson to GB 35 for 4 yards (A.Winfield).
              2nd and 6 at GNB 35 (Shotgun) R.Grant up the middle to GB 39 for 4 yards (C.Greenway).
              3rd and 2 at GNB 39 (Shotgun) A.Rodgers pass short middle to D.Driver to MIN 37 for 24 yards (E.Henderson, C.Griffin).
              1st and 10 at MIN 37 R.Grant left end to MIN 35 for 2 yards (M.Williams).
              2nd and 8 at MIN 35 A.Rodgers pass short left to D.Driver to MIN 21 for 14 yards (C.Griffin).
              1st and 10 at MIN 21 A.Rodgers sacked at MIN 25 for -4 yards (B.Robison).
              2nd and 14 at MIN 25 (Shotgun) A.Rodgers pass short left to R.Grant to MIN 5 for 20 yards (T.Johnson).
              1st and 5 at MIN 5 (Shotgun) R.Grant right guard to MIN 1 for 4 yards (E.Henderson).
              2nd and 1 at MIN 1 J.Kuhn left guard to MIN 1 for no gain (C.Greenway).
              3rd and 1 at MIN 1 (Shotgun) A.Rodgers pass short right to J.Finley to MIN 1 for no gain (B.Leber) [R.Edwards].
              Timeout #1 by GB at 02:18.
              4th and 1 at MIN 1 (Shotgun) A.Rodgers pass incomplete short middle to D.Lee.
              "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

              Comment


              • #8
                shit, maybe they could have ran it more. But I thought the play calling was pretty imagninative, they managed to move the ball reasonably well despite have the inferior line play. You can't condemn the results too much.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I thought M3 was outbearded, certainly. I mean, Chilly had a manly forest on his chin. That was the deciding factor.

                  You just can't fuck with this:
                  When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I'm not convinced running the ball more would have resulted in a victory, and this is one of those topics that a coach will be criticized for either way if his team loses.

                    We didn't run much and lost, therefore we should have run more. If McCarthy had committed to a 50-50 run/pass split while behind in the second half, we would all be ripping him for trying to run against the tough Vikings run defense instead of throwing the ball. Lose-lose situation for the coach.
                    "My problems with him are his vision and tendency to dance instead of pounding a hole." - Harvey Wallbangers

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by mraynrand
                      Originally posted by Fritz
                      Originally posted by mraynrand
                      Originally posted by Fritz
                      I agree. I think MM gave up on the run way, way way too soon. He gave up on the run when the game was tied at 14.

                      He didn't do his offensive linemen any favors with his play calling.
                      The Packer offense pretty much didn't touch the ball .after MN went up 14-7. They got the ball back and had three pass attempts for 0,5, and sacked. Perhaps on that drive a run might have worked Still, the next play was Matthews TD, then MN had a long drive to use up all but 30 sec in the half and then MN used up a lot of time scoring a TD at the start of the third. By the time the Packers offense got the ball again in the 3rd Quarter, they were down two TDs. McCarthy never had a chance to run the ball with the score tied.
                      Yes, that would have been exactly the time to run the ball a little.

                      I also don't know why, with over 15 minutes to play, being two touchdowns down somehow disqualifies a team from running. What, you're afraid your team might take up seven or eight minutes on a drive? So there'd be eight or nine minutes left and you're down by one touchdown, or maybe ten points?

                      You don't have to get pass happy that soon. MM - in my completely expert opinion, having coached my 16 year old daughter on the finer points of powder puff football for five minutes earlier this evening - abandons the run too soon, if he ever even gives it a shot.
                      Sure, mix it up. But let's look at reality: down two scores, McCarthy calls 4 runs for 10 yards not counting the QB scramble, and 9 passes with two sacks on a drive that should have resulted in a TD. Is this giving up on the run? It's not great production from the run game, but the run was in there.

                      GNB MIN
                      1st and 10 at GNB 18 A.Rodgers scrambles left end ran ob at GB 23 for 5 yards.
                      2nd and 5 at GNB 23 A.Rodgers sacked at GB 21 for -2 yards (J.Allen).
                      3rd and 7 at GNB 21 (Shotgun) A.Rodgers pass short right to J.Nelson to GB 31 for 10 yards (A.Winfield).
                      1st and 10 at GNB 31 A.Rodgers pass short right to J.Nelson to GB 35 for 4 yards (A.Winfield).
                      2nd and 6 at GNB 35 (Shotgun) R.Grant up the middle to GB 39 for 4 yards (C.Greenway).
                      3rd and 2 at GNB 39 (Shotgun) A.Rodgers pass short middle to D.Driver to MIN 37 for 24 yards (E.Henderson, C.Griffin).
                      1st and 10 at MIN 37 R.Grant left end to MIN 35 for 2 yards (M.Williams).
                      2nd and 8 at MIN 35 A.Rodgers pass short left to D.Driver to MIN 21 for 14 yards (C.Griffin).
                      1st and 10 at MIN 21 A.Rodgers sacked at MIN 25 for -4 yards (B.Robison).
                      2nd and 14 at MIN 25 (Shotgun) A.Rodgers pass short left to R.Grant to MIN 5 for 20 yards (T.Johnson).
                      1st and 5 at MIN 5 (Shotgun) R.Grant right guard to MIN 1 for 4 yards (E.Henderson).
                      2nd and 1 at MIN 1 J.Kuhn left guard to MIN 1 for no gain (C.Greenway).
                      3rd and 1 at MIN 1 (Shotgun) A.Rodgers pass short right to J.Finley to MIN 1 for no gain (B.Leber) [R.Edwards].
                      Timeout #1 by GB at 02:18.
                      4th and 1 at MIN 1 (Shotgun) A.Rodgers pass incomplete short middle to D.Lee.
                      You actually posted 1 of my HUGE gripes. 2nd and 1 at 1...standard set and run. 3rd and 4th...shotgun and pass. I called every play in that sequence starting with the 1st and 5 at the 5 based on the alignment...If I'm doing it, the D probably has a clue. I even nailed the FB dive play and the pass from the one not into the endzone.

                      How about a little bubba franks history...line up in a power running formation and release a TE. Oh yea, wouldn't work anyway cuz Lee would drop the fucking ball. Incidentally I did get 4th down wrong...I called a scrambling rodgers throws about 1 foot into the endzone for a touchdown...and then Lee dropped it.
                      The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Four runs in fourteen plays is not, to me, "mixing it up." That's running it 29% of the time.

                        Running more makes your passing game more effective because it forces the defense to at least consider the run instead of anticipating the pass.

                        Me no like.
                        "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

                        KYPack

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by denverYooper
                          I thought M3 was outbearded, certainly. I mean, Chilly had a manly forest on his chin. That was the deciding factor.

                          You just can't fuck with this:
                          He is certainly starting to look like a viking. Lose the glasses and don him in the mascot's garb and I think you've got it.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by bobblehead
                            You actually posted 1 of my HUGE gripes. 2nd and 1 at 1...standard set and run.
                            Personally, I LOVE play action on 2nd & 1, seems like an opportunity to do some real damage.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by MichiganPackerFan
                              Originally posted by bobblehead
                              You actually posted 1 of my HUGE gripes. 2nd and 1 at 1...standard set and run.
                              Personally, I LOVE play action on 2nd & 1, seems like an opportunity to do some real damage.
                              But at the goal line, you're not sucking the defense in to hit a long pass. Real estate is limited down there as are your pass options.
                              All hail the Ruler of the Meadow!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X