Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Chewy

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Chewy

    Chmura seems like a nice guy, and his analysis is frequently the best. I caught his Sunday morning radio show with Craig Karmazin today.

    One caller did inquire about the crop of high school girls this fall. Next.

    Chmura said last summer that Kampman should be traded 'cause he's a fish out of water. A correct and unpopular view.

    He also thinks that HAwk is an average player, and Chillar is their best linebacker, with MAthews looking like a future stud.

    I think the Sunday morn football show with Chmura is the best football talk to found. Chmura really knows his stuff. The show is moral like natural conversation compared to the grease and schtick from Steve the Homer True or The Big Unit.

  • #2
    Re: Chewy

    Agree about Kampman and Hawk. Is there any possibility at all that we trade either of these guys?

    Comment


    • #3
      Kampman looked like a fish out of water at DE last year so I'm not too whiny about his production this year. I do wish they'd let him pass rush about 40% more. Hawk looks good so far this year. Barnett looks more average to me.
      70% of the Earth is covered by water. The rest is covered by Al Harris.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by channtheman
        Agree about Kampman and Hawk. Is there any possibility at all that we trade either of these guys?
        Umm, this would be a very rare situation in the NFL. The trade of Braylon Edwards already happened in the season. That was a suprise because usually teams do not trade during the season, even less rare than a trade in the off-season.

        Kampman is going to be free agent and I doubt he will get tagged so any team that wants him will be able to have a shot at him in 2010.

        -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

        I have met Chumra and seen him around town, he is a jag. Typical big fish in a small town. This fall I saw him in a resturant bar. He came in about ten oclock in the evening looking like he came straight off the golf course with his Ping visor, his polo, and his plaid golf shorts, and also his golf spikes. Then the big dufus ordered a red wine in a beer joint.

        He acted like he was king shit of the place and did catch the eye of an average looking 50 year old woman.

        One of my last adventures with the Skinbasket we ran into a crack whore that claimed Mark Chumra "The American Chewy", fucked her. It was probably true, a couple of years ago before years of crack took it's toll she was a real good looking trampy slut type. She doesn't wear underwear.

        ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

        As far as his football takes, he is about as good as anyone elses. Again because he says something you agree with Harlan doesn't mean he is right.

        Comment


        • #5
          Why wouldn't he get tagged?
          70% of the Earth is covered by water. The rest is covered by Al Harris.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by 3irty1
            Kampman looked like a fish out of water at DE last year so I'm not too whiny about his production this year. I do wish they'd let him pass rush about 40% more. Hawk looks good so far this year. Barnett looks more average to me.
            I quite agree!
            Who Knows? The Shadow knows!

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Deputy Nutz
              As far as his football takes, he is about as good as anyone elses. Again because he says something you agree with Harlan doesn't mean he is right.
              No, I've listed to him over the years, he is the best WI football guru. His track record is better than other armchair QBs.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby
                Originally posted by Deputy Nutz
                As far as his football takes, he is about as good as anyone else's. Again because he says something you agree with Harlan doesn't mean he is right.
                No, I've listed to him over the years, he is the best WI football guru. His track record is better than other armchair QBs.
                I like the analysis, but only because its what I've been spouting all along (except kamp, thought he could adjust).

                I like Nutz's analysis of chewy more than chewy's analysis of the Packers though.
                The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

                Comment


                • #9
                  I like the radio show too, but the production values blow. Chewy comes over the air kind of faint, then Craig Karmazin's volume level booms off the charts.

                  Makes the show sound very amature hour, but the analysis is worth it.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Agree with Chewy and Butler's assessments. Requiring Kampy to drop into coverage is ridiculous. Scheme sweme. Rush your dominant pass rusher on almost every down.

                    Where are the Hawk apologists? Although Hawk is probably the most consistent performer its still not at the level associated with a first rounder. Recall some of the posters saying it was Vanilla Bob's fault for Hawk's performance. What about now?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by rbaloha

                      Where are the Hawk apologists? Although Hawk is probably the most consistent performer its still not at the level associated with a first rounder. Recall some of the posters saying it was Vanilla Bob's fault for Hawk's performance. What about now?
                      With Pick #5 we get Hawk. In another year, with Pick #7, the Vikes get AP. Such is life. There wasn't much going on in Hawk's draft besides Vernon Davis, and I sure didn't want VD then and I'm glad we don't have VD now.

                      Here is my apology for Hawk: I'm sorry you're an ass.
                      [QUOTE=George Cumby] ...every draft (Ted) would pick a solid, dependable, smart, athletically limited linebacker...the guy who isn't doing drugs, going to strip bars, knocking around his girlfriend or making any plays of game changing significance.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by swede
                        Originally posted by rbaloha

                        Where are the Hawk apologists? Although Hawk is probably the most consistent performer its still not at the level associated with a first rounder. Recall some of the posters saying it was Vanilla Bob's fault for Hawk's performance. What about now?
                        With Pick #5 we get Hawk. In another year, with Pick #7, the Vikes get AP. Such is life. There wasn't much going on in Hawk's draft besides Vernon Davis, and I sure didn't want VD then and I'm glad we don't have VD now.

                        Here is my apology for Hawk: I'm sorry you're an ass.
                        Would have loved VD. Finally starting to emerge. Hawk has peaked.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          VD cried when we didn't pick him--tears of joy because he didn't want to be here that much.
                          "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I still like the Hawk pick. I think he has played well this year.
                            Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              [quote="rbaloha"]Agree with Chewy and Butler's assessments. Requiring Kampy to drop into coverage is ridiculous. Scheme sweme. Rush your dominant pass rusher on almost every down.

                              Where are the Hawk apologists? Although Hawk is probably the most consistent performer its still not at the level associated with a first rounder. Recall some of the posters saying it was Vanilla Bob's fault for Hawk's performance. What about now?[/quote]

                              It's still V-Bob's fault. Once you get a good punching bag, you don't just let him go just because he's not with the team any more.

                              Hell, I blame Kurt Schottenheimer for the new safety's coverage problems against Minnesota.
                              "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

                              KYPack

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X