Best team ever!

[Pugger]

So BF is singing that tune yet again? I guess that's what happens when you get old and start repeating yourself...

[GrnBay007]

So BF is singing that tune yet again? I guess that's what happens when you get old and start repeating yourself...

.....and still winning!

[Pugger]

So BF is singing that tune yet again? I guess that's what happens when you get old and start repeating yourself...

.....and still winning!

You shouldn't be so happy about that if you are a Packer fan. With him as the starting QB of a divisional rival if he is winning that ain't good for the Packers.

[mmmdk]

So BF is singing that tune yet again? I guess that's what happens when you get old and start repeating yourself...

.....and still winning!

You shouldn't be so happy about that if you are a Packer fan. With him as the starting QB of a divisional rival if he is winning that ain't good for the Packers.

She's not a Packer fan first. Like a lot of people in here. I really don't care but quit lying. I mostly here for Packer info anyways as Packers comes first.

[Deputy Nutz]

So BF is singing that tune yet again? I guess that's what happens when you get old and start repeating yourself...

.....and still winning!

You shouldn't be so happy about that if you are a Packer fan. With him as the starting QB of a divisional rival if he is winning that ain't good for the Packers.

She's not a Packer fan first. Like a lot of people in here. I really don't care but quit lying. I mostly here for Packer info anyways as Packers comes first.

Good for you. I am proud of you. You are a sincere person. you will be rewarded.

[Deputy Nutz]

So BF is singing that tune yet again? I guess that's what happens when you get old and start repeating yourself...

.....and still winning!

You shouldn't be so happy about that if you are a Packer fan. With him as the starting QB of a divisional rival if he is winning that ain't good for the Packers.

Why do we have to support a GM and a franchise for making a personnel move that we don't agree with? Are we sheep? "Bossman says, good enough for me."

Packers deserve everything they get, positive and negative. The deserved the ass kicking they got from Favre in the Metro Dome, they simply haven't done enough in 2009 to compete with the Vikings in week 4 of the nfl season. Does that mean the Packers won't win in a couple of weeks? No, it means currently they are not good enough.

[Bossman641]

So BF is singing that tune yet again? I guess that's what happens when you get old and start repeating yourself...

.....and still winning!

You shouldn't be so happy about that if you are a Packer fan. With him as the starting QB of a divisional rival if he is winning that ain't good for the Packers.

Why do we have to support a GM and a franchise for making a personnel move that we don't agree with? Are we sheep? "Bossman says, good enough for me."

Packers deserve everything they get, positive and negative. The deserved the ass kicking they got from Favre in the Metro Dome, they simply haven't done enough in 2009 to compete with the Vikings in week 4 of the nfl season. Does that mean the Packers won't win in a couple of weeks? No, it means currently they are not good enough.

Regardless of whether you agree with the moves or not, a real fan would want them to win. They wouldn't want the team to struggle or play poorly because they "deserve" it.

[retailguy]

Regardless of whether you agree with the moves or not, a real fan would want them to win. They wouldn't want the team to struggle or play poorly because they "deserve" it.

Where did he say he didn't want them to win? I've read everything he's posted in the past couple of weeks and come to a very different conclusion.

I think what he is saying is "you reap what you sow". He's not surprised when they lose or when the play poorly, but less disappointed than he used to be.

Nutz - am I close?

[Bossman641]

Regardless of whether you agree with the moves or not, a real fan would want them to win. They wouldn't want the team to struggle or play poorly because they "deserve" it.

Where did he say he didn't want them to win? I've read everything he's posted in the past couple of weeks and come to a very different conclusion.

I think what he is saying is "you reap what you sow". He's not surprised when they lose or when the play poorly, but less disappointed than he used to be.

Nutz - am I close?

I guess you missed his repeated posts where he outright admitted he wanted the Vikings to beat the Packers, or his posts during the offseason where his dream scenario would be the Packers and Vikings meeting in the NFCCG and the Vikings going to the SB and winning it all.

*EDIT

Just look at the topic 2 down, "Excuses by packer fans..."

I have already heard a number of Packer fans on this board claim that this game is not that important, it is an early season game, bla bla bla. Nice way to set up a Packer loss.

I can't wait till Monday when the Vikings and Favre run all over the Packers.

Really sounds like someone pulling for the Packers huh?

[retailguy]

Look if you want to "cherry pick" statements, you can find any proof that you want, at any time you want. There are a few folks here, and that's all that they do. Don't add yourself to that list. It is infamy that you don't want. Next thing you know, you'll think you are an "expert" at anything you type.

I remember the comment, and I also remember the frustration around it. It had ZERO to do with wanting the Packers as a team to lose, and had everything to do about showing the GM who he is not fond of that he'd made what Nutz considered a mistake. Poor way to express that? Perhaps. But Nutz is clearly frustrated. That's clearly apparent. I attempted to answer the "why" part.

If you keep things in the proper context, and remove that frustration (that we all get once in a while), you arrive at the conclusion that I came to (I think).

We'll see what Nutz has to say...

[Bossman641]

Look if you want to "cherry pick" statements, you can find any proof that you want, at any time you want. There are a few folks here, and that's all that they do. Don't add yourself to that list. It is infamy that you don't want. Next thing you know, you'll think you are an "expert" at anything you type.

I remember the comment, and I also remember the frustration around it. It had ZERO to do with wanting the Packers as a team to lose, and had everything to do about showing the GM who he is not fond of that he'd made what Nutz considered a mistake. Poor way to express that? Perhaps. But Nutz is clearly frustrated. That's clearly apparent. I attempted to answer the "why" part.

If you keep things in the proper context, and remove that frustration (that we all get once in a while), you arrive at the conclusion that I came to (I think).

We'll see what Nutz has to say...

Agree to disagree. Regardless, it doesn't really matter to me what he says or whether he does or doesn't want them to win or lose. I just think it's a strange place to be at as a fan.

[Deputy Nutz]

Really both you two cut it out, I am beginning to blush .

Both of you are right. I no longer bleed Gold and Green. 1/8th of the time I want the Packers to lose this season, maybe one game in the playoffs as well. I don't support what Thompson is doing. If he is successful I have no problems admitting that I am wrong. I just don't think what he is doing to this point is successful, sure he has had some moments of success but he certainly has not brought stability to this franchise during his reign has GM.

If I knew the right answers I would most certainly not be posting here, and the very least I would be on some shitty blog right now, at the very most I would be running a CFL franchise, lets face it the NFL is all about who you know.

Hate the Packers, no. I just simply find them amusing.

[Deputy Nutz]

Look if you want to "cherry pick" statements, you can find any proof that you want, at any time you want. There are a few folks here, and that's all that they do. Don't add yourself to that list. It is infamy that you don't want. Next thing you know, you'll think you are an "expert" at anything you type.

I remember the comment, and I also remember the frustration around it. It had ZERO to do with wanting the Packers as a team to lose, and had everything to do about showing the GM who he is not fond of that he'd made what Nutz considered a mistake. Poor way to express that? Perhaps. But Nutz is clearly frustrated. That's clearly apparent. I attempted to answer the "why" part.

If you keep things in the proper context, and remove that frustration (that we all get once in a while), you arrive at the conclusion that I came to (I think).

We'll see what Nutz has to say...

Agree to disagree. Regardless, it doesn't really matter to me what he says or whether he does or doesn't want them to win or lose. I just think it's a strange place to be at as a fan.

Why should you question why I am here, I could leave and then this place would be down to 21 regular posters.

[Bossman641]

Look if you want to "cherry pick" statements, you can find any proof that you want, at any time you want. There are a few folks here, and that's all that they do. Don't add yourself to that list. It is infamy that you don't want. Next thing you know, you'll think you are an "expert" at anything you type.

I remember the comment, and I also remember the frustration around it. It had ZERO to do with wanting the Packers as a team to lose, and had everything to do about showing the GM who he is not fond of that he'd made what Nutz considered a mistake. Poor way to express that? Perhaps. But Nutz is clearly frustrated. That's clearly apparent. I attempted to answer the "why" part.

If you keep things in the proper context, and remove that frustration (that we all get once in a while), you arrive at the conclusion that I came to (I think).

We'll see what Nutz has to say...

Agree to disagree. Regardless, it doesn't really matter to me what he says or whether he does or doesn't want them to win or lose. I just think it's a strange place to be at as a fan.

Why should you question why I am here, I could leave and then this place would be down to 21 regular posters.

Strange place mentally - rooting against the team you loved for however many years.

That's what I meant.

[mngolf19]

Get back to me when the Vikings are #1 in the league in both offense and defense like the '96 team was. Then we'll talk.

No shit, and exactly who have they played? Lions, Browns, Rams, 49ers, and Packers. They should have lost to the 49ers and if not for our horrible line play I think we would have beaten them. The injury to Clifton made us change 3 guys on the line which already has three new starters.

First, stats can't answer this question, it's subjective. It's his opinion right or wrong. Second, "and if not for our horrible line play I think we would have beaten them."?????? Wow.