Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Very good read from Bedard

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Maxie the Taxi
    Unitas was a superb passer and playcaller, but Starr was every bit his equal and should be ranked right up there with Unitas if not above him.
    As long as we are on the subject of old-school QB's...What was with Unitas? Sounds like the gun-slinger of his day? Looking at his stats from the past he really had a piss-poor QB rating vs. Starr's stellar QB rating. Looks (based on stats) like a more reckless Favre vs. Starr's precision (Bernie Kosar like).
    Snake's Twitter comments would be LEGENDARY.........if I was ugly or gave a shit about Twitter.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by SnakeLH2006
      Originally posted by Maxie the Taxi
      Unitas was a superb passer and playcaller, but Starr was every bit his equal and should be ranked right up there with Unitas if not above him.
      As long as we are on the subject of old-school QB's...What was with Unitas? Sounds like the gun-slinger of his day? Looking at his stats from the past he really had a piss-poor QB rating vs. Starr's stellar QB rating. Looks (based on stats) like a more reckless Favre vs. Starr's precision (Bernie Kosar like).
      You pretty much got it right (although comparing Starr's enything to Bernie Kosar's is kind of a heresy).

      I loved to watch Unitas. Like Favre, he was scary good and exciting. He had the best receivers in the league in Raymond Berry, Johnny Orr and John Mackey, and he could find them in a crowd. Raymond Berry, especially, could catch anything thrown remotely near him. Like Favre, Unitas would toss it up and expect his receivers to make a play.

      Starr's QB rating speaks to his controlling the game, eliminating mistakes and turnovers.

      When Starr got the ball in the last minutes of the game needing a score, I never worried about an interception ruining things. I expected a score. Not the case with Favre as you know. It was constantly holding your breath, dreading the big pick.
      One time Lombardi was disgusted with the team in practice and told them they were going to have to start with the basics. He held up a ball and said: "This is a football." McGee immediately called out, "Stop, coach, you're going too fast," and that gave everyone a laugh.
      John Maxymuk, Packers By The Numbers

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by SnakeLH2006
        Bottom line...Arod is young and learning. Favre used to wing it up (INT's) early in his career. Arod runs around and gets sacked. Same results. Nope. Favre won EVERY year till TT took over. Sorry. I still like ARod but to compare the dude to a HOF is stupid. He needs to learn to dump the ball off the sidelines quicker. He might not throw the INT (but it's kinda a punt the way Brett did it on 3rd down).....when ARod gets sacked...it just sucks. Favre's sacks were 2-5 yard losses. Arod runs around with 10-12 yard losses on his sacks. HUGE difference. That's Arod's BIGGEST mistake.
        Yep, and Arod has won EVERY year except when TT was the GM...sometimes you make it too easy....I won't even get into the defensive misery that cost ARod a bare minimum 8-8 year which BF has had in the past. And its conveniant for you to discount BF's 29 interceptions for the "not his fault" 4-12 season.

        Get out of here with the BF apologist bullshit. ARod would have won every game he ever started if everyone else on the team was perfect.
        The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by bobblehead
          Originally posted by SnakeLH2006
          Bottom line...Arod is young and learning. Favre used to wing it up (INT's) early in his career. Arod runs around and gets sacked. Same results. Nope. Favre won EVERY year till TT took over. Sorry. I still like ARod but to compare the dude to a HOF is stupid. He needs to learn to dump the ball off the sidelines quicker. He might not throw the INT (but it's kinda a punt the way Brett did it on 3rd down).....when ARod gets sacked...it just sucks. Favre's sacks were 2-5 yard losses. Arod runs around with 10-12 yard losses on his sacks. HUGE difference. That's Arod's BIGGEST mistake.
          Yep, and Arod has won EVERY year except when TT was the GM...sometimes you make it too easy....I won't even get into the defensive misery that cost ARod a bare minimum 8-8 year which BF has had in the past. And its conveniant for you to discount BF's 29 interceptions for the "not his fault" 4-12 season.

          Get out of here with the BF apologist bullshit. ARod would have won every game he ever started if everyone else on the team was perfect.
          I would hope that every QB in the NFL would.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Partial
            Originally posted by bobblehead
            Originally posted by SnakeLH2006
            Bottom line...Arod is young and learning. Favre used to wing it up (INT's) early in his career. Arod runs around and gets sacked. Same results. Nope. Favre won EVERY year till TT took over. Sorry. I still like ARod but to compare the dude to a HOF is stupid. He needs to learn to dump the ball off the sidelines quicker. He might not throw the INT (but it's kinda a punt the way Brett did it on 3rd down).....when ARod gets sacked...it just sucks. Favre's sacks were 2-5 yard losses. Arod runs around with 10-12 yard losses on his sacks. HUGE difference. That's Arod's BIGGEST mistake.
            Yep, and Arod has won EVERY year except when TT was the GM...sometimes you make it too easy....I won't even get into the defensive misery that cost ARod a bare minimum 8-8 year which BF has had in the past. And its conveniant for you to discount BF's 29 interceptions for the "not his fault" 4-12 season.

            Get out of here with the BF apologist bullshit. ARod would have won every game he ever started if everyone else on the team was perfect.
            I would hope that every QB in the NFL would.
            Kinda my point. I agree we shouldn't compare ARod to BF at his best right now, but to start making excuses for BF not winning while not allowing for the same excuse for ARod is silly. BF was wild and tossed a mountain of picks early on in his career. Whether he managed to go 8-8 or 9-7 instead of 7-9 had as much to do with the TEAM as it did with anything else.
            The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Maxie the Taxi
              Originally posted by SnakeLH2006
              Maybe I'm reading into it, but it must be the clutchness factor/championships/accuracy/all of it?

              Sounds like Bart was a helluva QB from what I've heard of anyone who's seen him play. With all those rings, how come he's not mentioned with the all-time greats? That's all I ask? Why is that? Thanks.
              Yes, Starr was among the best. He doesn't get credit because of an old canard: the Packers had so much talent in those years, anyone could have been the QB and won championships.

              That's all BS of course. Anyone who watched Starr and the Packers knows that Starr was the heart and soul of that team. I think even Lombardi said that Starr held it all together and was the essential cog.

              You have to remember that in those days the QB called all the plays. Very seldom did a play come in from the sidelines. As Fritz pointed out, Starr was the best field general ever. No one was better at keeping a defense off balance.

              Unitas was a superb passer and playcaller, but Starr was every bit his equal and should be ranked right up there with Unitas if not above him.

              Plus, the Packers had a hell of a ground game, so Starr's stats were not huge in terms of yardage. But his completion percentage was among the best, I believe. Very Brady or Montana-like.


              Nice post Maxi. Starr wasn't paid to be a stat machine. He was paid to win.

              Comment


              • #22
                A-Rod is confident that the line protects long enough for an open receiver to emerge. Sometimes it works and sometimes it does not.

                IMO A-Rod needs to throw the ball away more. Have faith the next play works. The 2nd and 3rd longs are hurting too much.

                MM also could help by running more screens and draws.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by rbaloha
                  A-Rod is confident that the line protects long enough for an open receiver to emerge. Sometimes it works and sometimes it does not.

                  IMO A-Rod needs to throw the ball away more.
                  Have faith the next play works. The 2nd and 3rd longs are hurting too much.

                  MM also could help by running more screens and draws.

                  Amen to that. A bunch of those sacks are on him for not being able to get rid of the ball.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by bobblehead
                    Originally posted by Partial
                    Originally posted by bobblehead
                    Originally posted by SnakeLH2006
                    Bottom line...Arod is young and learning. Favre used to wing it up (INT's) early in his career. Arod runs around and gets sacked. Same results. Nope. Favre won EVERY year till TT took over. Sorry. I still like ARod but to compare the dude to a HOF is stupid. He needs to learn to dump the ball off the sidelines quicker. He might not throw the INT (but it's kinda a punt the way Brett did it on 3rd down).....when ARod gets sacked...it just sucks. Favre's sacks were 2-5 yard losses. Arod runs around with 10-12 yard losses on his sacks. HUGE difference. That's Arod's BIGGEST mistake.
                    Yep, and Arod has won EVERY year except when TT was the GM...sometimes you make it too easy....I won't even get into the defensive misery that cost ARod a bare minimum 8-8 year which BF has had in the past. And its conveniant for you to discount BF's 29 interceptions for the "not his fault" 4-12 season.

                    Get out of here with the BF apologist bullshit. ARod would have won every game he ever started if everyone else on the team was perfect.
                    I would hope that every QB in the NFL would.
                    Kinda my point. I agree we shouldn't compare ARod to BF at his best right now, but to start making excuses for BF not winning while not allowing for the same excuse for ARod is silly. BF was wild and tossed a mountain of picks early on in his career. Whether he managed to go 8-8 or 9-7 instead of 7-9 had as much to do with the TEAM as it did with anything else.
                    Were a team with few star players but Aaron Rodgers is certainly our best and brightest.
                    ** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
                    ** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
                    ** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
                    ** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Scott Campbell
                      Originally posted by rbaloha
                      A-Rod is confident that the line protects long enough for an open receiver to emerge. Sometimes it works and sometimes it does not.

                      IMO A-Rod needs to throw the ball away more.
                      Have faith the next play works. The 2nd and 3rd longs are hurting too much.

                      MM also could help by running more screens and draws.

                      Amen to that. A bunch of those sacks are on him for not being able to get rid of the ball.
                      That was kinda my point. I like Arod. I liked Brett too.

                      I've said it again and again...Arod's biggest flaw keeping him from elite status is savviness in the pocket to get rid of the ball (ala taking a big sack vs. tossing it out of bounds). Brett's biggest weakness was always the opposite. Pocket savvy (to avoid big sacks), but a willingness to NOT heave it out of bounds but up for grabs....A horse a piece. Both kill drives when that happens.

                      Favre played on some average teams too for several years. Arod is not that far off at all...But for every Favre apologist (I'm not, but I do respect his 1 losing season out of 18 as a starting QB)....... there's an ARod apologist too that says look at the team, it's not his fault.

                      There's blame all over the place when a pick is thrown or sacks are taken (often on the QB). Favre has never been perfect, nor is Arod.
                      Snake's Twitter comments would be LEGENDARY.........if I was ugly or gave a shit about Twitter.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X