Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bishop wants out?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 3
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 template Next
  • #1

    Bishop wants out?

    Fantasy Sports
    https://www.rotoworld.com
    Find all the latest Rotoworld fantasy sports news, live coverage, videos, highlights, stats, predictions, and results right here on NBC Sports.


    Packers LB Desmond Bishop said Sunday that he wouldn't mind a trade out of Green Bay before the October 20 deadline.

    Bishop has been underutilized as a No. 4 inside linebacker, but GM Ted Thompson would never give up such a cheap, talented player with special teams value. Bishop will just have to hope for an injury to get on the field.
    Source: Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel
    Tags: None
  • #2
    Can't say that I blame him. I would think the team is giving him the wink-wink nudge nudge telling him he'll have a shot to start next year since I just don't see Hawk back.

    Comment

    • #3
      Originally posted by Partial
      Can't say that I blame him. I would think the team is giving him the wink-wink nudge nudge telling him he'll have a shot to start next year since I just don't see Hawk back.
      Disagree entirely. Hawk isn't going anywhere.
      All hail the Ruler of the Meadow!

      Comment

      • #4
        Originally posted by Cheesehead Craig
        Originally posted by Partial
        Can't say that I blame him. I would think the team is giving him the wink-wink nudge nudge telling him he'll have a shot to start next year since I just don't see Hawk back.
        Disagree entirely. Hawk isn't going anywhere.
        Trading Bishop is a mistake. Hawk is signed thru 2010.

        Comment

        • #5
          Provided Bishop's not traded by the Tuesday trade deadline...

          Someone from the LB corp is gonna miss some playing time at some point this year. As long as Bishop is patient he will get his chance.

          It's then up to him to show he belongs on the field.
          "Everyone's born anarchist and atheist until people start lying to them" ~ wise philosopher

          Comment

          • #6
            He was answering a question about rumors he's on the trading block, not lobbying for a move publicly.

            BTW, Eagles looking for a linebacker, possibly. Compensation mentioned here isn't going to cut it though...

            Andy Reid hints at a possible trade
            http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/10/19/andy-reid-hints-at-a-possible-trade/
            With the 2009 trade deadline less than 28 hours away, the Eagles could be making a move.
            Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

            Comment

            • #7
              yup, he's not demanding anything

              he just wouldn't bitch if it did happen

              nothing to worry about here

              Comment

              • #8
                most second stringers wouldnt care.
                Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

                Comment

                • #9
                  trade him for lineman.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Barnett seemed to play slightly better vs. the Lions. I wanna see him against the Vikes or start thinking Bishop would be an upgrade... that said I wouldn't care if we traded Barnett for value.
                    The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have.
                    Vince Lombardi

                    "Not really interested in being a spoiler or an underdog. We're the Green Bay Packers." McCarthy.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Fosco33
                      Barnett seemed to play slightly better vs. the Lions. I wanna see him against the Vikes or start thinking Bishop would be an upgrade... that said I wouldn't care if we traded Barnett for value.
                      Barnett appears to have regained confidence. Looks bigger. Worth keeping.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Originally posted by rbaloha
                        Originally posted by Fosco33
                        Barnett seemed to play slightly better vs. the Lions. I wanna see him against the Vikes or start thinking Bishop would be an upgrade... that said I wouldn't care if we traded Barnett for value.
                        Barnett appears to have regained confidence. Looks bigger. Worth keeping.
                        Keep Barnett, give rid of Hawk already. Guy is a bust and makes no plays! I think the coaches are finally realizing that as well since Hawk only played like 15 snaps all game.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Brandon494
                          Originally posted by rbaloha
                          Originally posted by Fosco33
                          Barnett seemed to play slightly better vs. the Lions. I wanna see him against the Vikes or start thinking Bishop would be an upgrade... that said I wouldn't care if we traded Barnett for value.
                          Barnett appears to have regained confidence. Looks bigger. Worth keeping.
                          Keep Barnett, give rid of Hawk already. Guy is a bust and makes no plays! I think the coaches are finally realizing that as well since Hawk only played like 15 snaps all game.
                          Axe them both...
                          The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have.
                          Vince Lombardi

                          "Not really interested in being a spoiler or an underdog. We're the Green Bay Packers." McCarthy.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Brandon494
                            Originally posted by rbaloha
                            Originally posted by Fosco33
                            Barnett seemed to play slightly better vs. the Lions. I wanna see him against the Vikes or start thinking Bishop would be an upgrade... that said I wouldn't care if we traded Barnett for value.
                            Barnett appears to have regained confidence. Looks bigger. Worth keeping.
                            Keep Barnett, give rid of Hawk already. Guy is a bust and makes no plays! I think the coaches are finally realizing that as well since Hawk only played like 15 snaps all game.
                            Keep Hawk. Wouldn't at all mind seeing Barnett moved.
                            Who Knows? The Shadow knows!

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              Hawk can only be considered a bust if you consider his extra high draft position. If we got the guy in the 3rd round we'd say how solid of a player he is. I hope the new CBA has a rigid rookie cap in place. These guys make way too much as 1st rounders without doing a damned thing.
                              Originally posted by 3irty1
                              This is museum quality stupidity.

                              Comment

                              Previous 1 2 3 template Next
                              Working...
                              X