Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Chew on this Hawk Lovers!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • From what I could see, Hawk had a real good game. Couple tackles for a loss and several other good plays.
    All hail the Ruler of the Meadow!

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Cheesehead Craig
      From what I could see, Hawk had a real good game. Couple tackles for a loss and several other good plays.

      He had a hell of a good game. Maybe a taste of sitting on the bench will be good for him.
      GO PACK!!!!

      Comment


      • Originally posted by PackerTimer
        Originally posted by Cheesehead Craig
        From what I could see, Hawk had a real good game. Couple tackles for a loss and several other good plays.

        He had a hell of a good game. Maybe a taste of sitting on the bench will be good for him.
        I wouldnt call it a hell of a game, had 1 tackle for loss. Vernon Davis on the other hand had a hell of a game with 3 TDs.

        Comment


        • Hawk played well -- flying around and tfl. If he continues to play this way the impact plays shall happen. Impressive performance albeit against a bad team.

          Comment


          • He pretty much did what he's done all season. He's been stout against the run. He doesn't make a lot of plays, but he's far and away our best LB against the run.
            "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

            Comment


            • I like A.J. He's the player I wanted us to draft and I'm glad he's on the team. I do think he's a better 4-3 LB than a 3-4 LB but he does his job and I'm good with that.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Brandon494
                Originally posted by PackerTimer
                Originally posted by Cheesehead Craig
                From what I could see, Hawk had a real good game. Couple tackles for a loss and several other good plays.

                He had a hell of a good game. Maybe a taste of sitting on the bench will be good for him.
                I wouldnt call it a hell of a game, had 1 tackle for loss. Vernon Davis on the other hand had a hell of a game with 3 TDs.
                sometimes forcing the other team to alter their play because you're blowing it up in the backfield is as impressive as actually having a TFL. I'll still take Hawk over Davis anyday.
                "I would love to have a guy that always gets the key hit, a pitcher that always makes his best pitch and a manager that can always make the right decision. The problem is getting him to put down his beer and come out of the stands and do those things." - Danny Murraugh

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Brandon494
                  Originally posted by PackerTimer
                  Originally posted by Cheesehead Craig
                  From what I could see, Hawk had a real good game. Couple tackles for a loss and several other good plays.

                  He had a hell of a good game. Maybe a taste of sitting on the bench will be good for him.
                  I wouldnt call it a hell of a game, had 1 tackle for loss. Vernon Davis on the other hand had a hell of a game with 3 TDs.
                  Hawk had his best game of the season... he was all over the place and around (involved in tackles) most of the runs that were stuffed for <1 yard gains. Although I thought he looked pretty bonehead on the play where Anderson fumbled the snap at the goal line and he rolled around like an idiot with the ball right underneath him.

                  Now if you want to compare Hawk's game to Davis' that's another story... yall seem to forget Davis not wanting to come to GB at all so if it took him this long to start making some impact plays, I wonder if they would have ever came in GB.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Brandon494
                    Originally posted by PackerTimer
                    Originally posted by Cheesehead Craig
                    From what I could see, Hawk had a real good game. Couple tackles for a loss and several other good plays.

                    He had a hell of a good game. Maybe a taste of sitting on the bench will be good for him.
                    I wouldnt call it a hell of a game, had 1 tackle for loss. Vernon Davis on the other hand had a hell of a game with 3 TDs.
                    It was a very good game. Maybe only one tackle for loss, but he beat single blocking several times to make tackles. Exactly what Moss asked him to do last week.
                    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by ND72
                      sometimes forcing the other team to alter their play because you're blowing it up in the backfield is as impressive as actually having a TFL. I'll still take Hawk over Davis anyday.
                      Yea I kinda figured that from your avatar.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by mission
                        Hawk had his best game of the season... he was all over the place and around (involved in tackles) most of the runs that were stuffed for <1 yard gains. Although I thought he looked pretty bonehead on the play where Anderson fumbled the snap at the goal line and he rolled around like an idiot with the ball right underneath him.

                        Now if you want to compare Hawk's game to Davis' that's another story... yall seem to forget Davis not wanting to come to GB at all so if it took him this long to start making some impact plays, I wonder if they would have ever came in GB.
                        Davis has never had a solid QB in SF to throw him the ball. Also about the fact not wanting to come to Green Bay I'm sure most players coming out of college arent big fans about coming to Green Bay. I mean even Charles Woodson said he would never play in Green Bay before coming here.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Fritz
                          Do tell, oh Rats, who you wanted - at the time. Not now. Not with hindsight. So who'd you want them to take at #5??
                          (snip)
                          I had been hoping D'Brickashaw Ferguson would fall to us, but when the Jets took him, I wanted Hawk.
                          Teamwork is what the Green Bay Packers were all about. They didn't do it for individual glory. They did it because they loved one another.
                          Vince Lombardi

                          Comment


                          • I knew when Davis burst into tears at the Hawk pick that TT made the right call. There's not wanting to be somewhere, but that's a WHOLE LOT of not wanting to be somewhere. I wonder if he said something in his interviews to seal his fate.
                            "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Brandon494
                              Davis has never had a solid QB in SF to throw him the ball.
                              Up until this year, Hawk hasn't had a DC worth a damn that could utilize him. So does he then get a free pass also?
                              All hail the Ruler of the Meadow!

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Cheesehead Craig
                                Originally posted by Brandon494
                                Davis has never had a solid QB in SF to throw him the ball.
                                Up until this year, Hawk hasn't had a DC worth a damn that could utilize him. So does he then get a free pass also?
                                no Hawk does not get the benefit of the doubt! He is too high of a pick to get a pass...
                                Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X