Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who's amped for next week's Vikes @ GB rematch?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Who's amped for next week's Vikes @ GB rematch?

    Game of the century

    Favre gets applause

    Aaron plays well

    Chilly sucks as usual

    Favre sucks like he has for 2 decades

    DD goes off

    AD wrecks shop

    Pack barely pull it out b/c of coachn

    LET'S GOOOOOOO.........!!!!
    0
    Pack by 7
    0%
    0
    Vikes by 7
    0%
    0
    Pack by 14
    0%
    0
    Vikes by 14
    0%
    0
    They said God has a Tim Tebow complex!

    Brew Crew in 2011!!!

  • #2
    Re: Who's amped for next week's Vikes @ GB rematch?

    Originally posted by MOBB DEEP
    Game of the century

    Favre gets applause

    Aaron plays well

    Chilly sucks as usual

    Favre sucks like he has for 2 decades

    DD goes off

    AD wrecks shop

    Pack barely pull it out b/c of coachn

    LET'S GOOOOOOO.........!!!!
    And then you wake up from your dream..lol..I'd love to win this game as much as any other Packer fan, but it's going to be tough. The Vikings have a better OL and DL and a better RB, and are much more battle tested. (Pitt, Balt, SF). We've beaten the Lions, Browns, Rams, and Bears. Whoopie..We still look very undisciplined. Anything can happen, but on paper right now I'd have to predict a Viking win by at least 4. I'd love to be wrong.
    www.ccso228@twitter.com

    Comment


    • #3
      Hated to do it, but I just don't trust the O-line against Minnesota enough to pick a Packer win, even at Lambeau. 27-20, Vikings.
      Teamwork is what the Green Bay Packers were all about. They didn't do it for individual glory. They did it because they loved one another.
      Vince Lombardi

      Comment


      • #4
        But they have a shitty secondary so that could help us!
        Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Who's amped for next week's Vikes @ GB rematch?

          Originally posted by imscott72
          Originally posted by MOBB DEEP
          Game of the century

          Favre gets applause

          Aaron plays well

          Chilly sucks as usual

          Favre sucks like he has for 2 decades

          DD goes off

          AD wrecks shop

          Pack barely pull it out b/c of coachn

          LET'S GOOOOOOO.........!!!!
          And then you wake up from your dream..lol..I'd love to win this game as much as any other Packer fan, but it's going to be tough. The Vikings have a better OL and DL and a better RB, and are much more battle tested. (Pitt, Balt, SF). We've beaten the Lions, Browns, Rams, and Bears. Whoopie..We still look very undisciplined. Anything can happen, but on paper right now I'd have to predict a Viking win by at least 4. I'd love to be wrong.
          Im startn to believe that coachn means alot in the parity-laden NFL; and chilly is VERY suspect. I agree about the testing Vikes have had but this IS a div rivalry (e.g., Skins swept Eagles last year but who gives them a shot tomorow other than themselves?!)
          They said God has a Tim Tebow complex!

          Brew Crew in 2011!!!

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Tony Oday
            But they have a shitty secondary so that could help us!
            If your QB is on his ass the whole game it doesn't matter if they have you or I back there..
            www.ccso228@twitter.com

            Comment


            • #7
              Pack keep the momentum rolling and win 27-21.
              Go PACK

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by imscott72
                Originally posted by Tony Oday
                But they have a shitty secondary so that could help us!
                If your QB is on his ass the whole game it doesn't matter if they have you or I back there..
                not even the Queens can get to AR on three step drops ALL the time Quick hit slants and such should work wonders...oh some draws to JA side would be awesome to keep him at home!
                Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Who's amped for next week's Vikes @ GB rematch?

                  Originally posted by MOBB DEEP

                  Favre gets applause......

                  .....for throwing his 4th pick of the game.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    27-14 PACKERS.

                    Home field. Our line will be better than last time and outdoor gives them a boost. + I like either Cliffy or Lang better than DC at LT. So, Allen will get pressure but won't be as huge a factor. He was a killer in game 1.

                    Winfield is probably out. Looks like Finley probably will be also. That's a push.

                    AD gets more yards. Favre plays worse at least 1 pick. Push.

                    We call more runs. I hope.

                    The difference will be Bigby. This game won't be 11 on 10 when Vikes are on offense this time.
                    When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Tony Oday
                      Originally posted by imscott72
                      Originally posted by Tony Oday
                      But they have a shitty secondary so that could help us!
                      If your QB is on his ass the whole game it doesn't matter if they have you or I back there..
                      not even the Queens can get to AR on three step drops ALL the time Quick hit slants and such should work wonders...oh some draws to JA side would be awesome to keep him at home!
                      Yea I'm sure they know nothing about our quick slants.. I would like to see them get back to the screens. We had some success in the first half of the last game doing that. You know they're going to go blitz happy, so hopefully some screen passes will be in the package next week.
                      www.ccso228@twitter.com

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by imscott72
                        Originally posted by Tony Oday
                        Originally posted by imscott72
                        Originally posted by Tony Oday
                        But they have a shitty secondary so that could help us!
                        If your QB is on his ass the whole game it doesn't matter if they have you or I back there..
                        not even the Queens can get to AR on three step drops ALL the time Quick hit slants and such should work wonders...oh some draws to JA side would be awesome to keep him at home!
                        Yea I'm sure they know nothing about our quick slants.. I would like to see them get back to the screens. We had some success in the first half of the last game doing that. You know they're going to go blitz happy, so hopefully some screen passes will be in the package next week.
                        Everyone knows about them but we still hit on them all the time
                        Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          If I am the Lambeau groundscrew, I start watering the field tonight!
                          Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I think Ted should dump Favre's old locker in the visitors locker room.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Who's amped for next week's Vikes @ GB rematch?

                              Originally posted by MOBB DEEP
                              Game of the century

                              Favre gets applause

                              Aaron plays well

                              Chilly sucks as usual

                              Favre sucks like he has for 2 decades

                              DD goes off

                              AD wrecks shop

                              Pack barely pull it out b/c of coachn

                              LET'S GOOOOOOO.........!!!!
                              While I won't be a Chilly apologist, what exactly makes MM better?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X