Ooooouchy !

[Scott Campbell]

Re: Ooooouchy !

Even my favorite rival on here Scott knows that. At least with him he supports his facts (although in his own twisted way) instead of bouncing around the ones posted.

........like when I posted that the Bears gave up too much for Cutler, and that Orton wasn't just a throw away player?

[BEARMAN]

I was accualy looking forward to Kyles coming out party, up untill we got Jay that was. I thought Kyle was alot better then most peeps gave him credit for.

[mraynrand]

Re: Ooooouchy !

[quote:57b6c718b3="gbgary"][quote:57b6c718b3="BEARMAN"]What do you think, lack of prepairiedness, too long off (buy week), or just plain old azz kickin ? I am glad it is over, one loss, move on.
On another note, may I ask, what are ya alls feeling on Lord Favre coming into his/your house to do battle ? Just woundering ?

if we lose the next one we'll all join you in the 2010 draft talk thread. fix a big pot of coffee, it's gonna be a long wait.

Tank checks in!

Do they have any picks left?



Gotta give Bearman a big shout out for showing his ugly face here after a difficult loss. Unlike the other cowardly bear troll.

Glad to hear you were thinking of me. Excuse me for not being glued to a PC while I was out enjoying my vacation. I havent posted on here in about two weeks so why would you expect me to instantly be on here ONE day after the Bears played..lol.

coincidentally the exact stretch of the season where the pack has looked better, moved ahead in the standings, and the bears have lost 2 in a row.

Amazing how that works.

If you check my post you will see I been away before any of that took place. But just for kicks, keep in mind the teams you played over that stretch versus who the Bears have faced.
But in time we will see how it plays out.

I see a post SATURDAY THE 10th OF OCTOBER. Yeah, you were solidly away the day before the pack won and the Bears lost.

Anyway, since you were gone, i'll take this opportunity to remind you that the PACK BEAT THE BEARS. oh, and we are ahead of you in the standings. Oh, and you aren't continually improving. Oh, and we aren't declining.

That would seem to cover it.

Hmm, I believe that would make it BEFORE the Bears lost anything, or even BEFORE the Packers start back winning. Thanks for doing the work for me buddy.

I wonder what did that post say? I'm sure if it was about bragging about the Packers losing or the Bears winning you would have posted it. But either way, like I have said before, we will see how the season pans out.

Exactly the point. You said you had been gone before. I day before a game hardly constitutes being gone. And, like i mentioned, coincidentally exactly when the bears lose you stop posting. LOL

Packers beat the bears. Bears are behind the pack. Bears look like shit. Packers are improving, bears falling apart.

wow..one day before the game still is before the games DOES still constitute being gone. Remind me NOT to recommend that school you attended to anyone. I thought that was simply put. But, ummmm...Ok.

Have a nice week kid

Yeah. You were really gone. AMAZING coincidence that the day b4 you are posting and then after a bears loss and packer win, you stop posting.

No, posting the day before the game doesn't mean you are gone. You were gone on GAME DAY. We checked your posts..and you disappeared exactly on game day..not before.

Just remember, Packers beat the bears. The bears are not continuously improving. The packers aren't in decline, they are on the upswing.[/quote:57b6c718b3]

Who is WE Ty? I must ask, why are you wasting so much time and energy on something SO irrelevant. It dosen't matter, So your saying that if He isn't gone on vacation on sat. that he SURELY couldn't have left that night or the next day.

Just let it go.[/quote:57b6c718b3]

Tank checks in!

[gbgary]

Re: Ooooouchy !

[quote:02636a855b="Scott Campbell"][quote:02636a855b="gbgary"][quote:02636a855b="BEARMAN"]What do you think, lack of prepairiedness, too long off (buy week), or just plain old azz kickin ? I am glad it is over, one loss, move on.
On another note, may I ask, what are ya alls feeling on Lord Favre coming into his/your house to do battle ? Just woundering ?

if we lose the next one we'll all join you in the 2010 draft talk thread. fix a big pot of coffee, it's gonna be a long wait.

Tank checks in!

Do they have any picks left?



Gotta give Bearman a big shout out for showing his ugly face here after a difficult loss. Unlike the other cowardly bear troll.

Glad to hear you were thinking of me. Excuse me for not being glued to a PC while I was out enjoying my vacation. I havent posted on here in about two weeks so why would you expect me to instantly be on here ONE day after the Bears played..lol.

coincidentally the exact stretch of the season where the pack has looked better, moved ahead in the standings, and the bears have lost 2 in a row.

Amazing how that works.

If you check my post you will see I been away before any of that took place. But just for kicks, keep in mind the teams you played over that stretch versus who the Bears have faced.
But in time we will see how it plays out.

I see a post SATURDAY THE 10th OF OCTOBER. Yeah, you were solidly away the day before the pack won and the Bears lost.

Anyway, since you were gone, i'll take this opportunity to remind you that the PACK BEAT THE BEARS. oh, and we are ahead of you in the standings. Oh, and you aren't continually improving. Oh, and we aren't declining.

That would seem to cover it.

Hmm, I believe that would make it BEFORE the Bears lost anything, or even BEFORE the Packers start back winning. Thanks for doing the work for me buddy.

I wonder what did that post say? I'm sure if it was about bragging about the Packers losing or the Bears winning you would have posted it. But either way, like I have said before, we will see how the season pans out.

Exactly the point. You said you had been gone before. I day before a game hardly constitutes being gone. And, like i mentioned, coincidentally exactly when the bears lose you stop posting. LOL

Packers beat the bears. Bears are behind the pack. Bears look like shit. Packers are improving, bears falling apart.

wow..one day before the game still is before the games DOES still constitute being gone. Remind me NOT to recommend that school you attended to anyone. I thought that was simply put. But, ummmm...Ok.

Have a nice week kid

Yeah. You were really gone. AMAZING coincidence that the day b4 you are posting and then after a bears loss and packer win, you stop posting.

No, posting the day before the game doesn't mean you are gone. You were gone on GAME DAY. We checked your posts..and you disappeared exactly on game day..not before.

Just remember, Packers beat the bears. The bears are not continuously improving. The packers aren't in decline, they are on the upswing.[/quote:02636a855b]

Who is WE Ty? I must ask, why are you wasting so much time and energy on something SO irrelevant. It dosen't matter, So your saying that if He isn't gone on vacation on sat. that he SURELY couldn't have left that night or the next day.

Just let it go.[/quote:02636a855b]

Tank checks in![/quote:02636a855b]

i've gotta post just to keep this massive quotefest going...

[Dabaddestbear]

Re: Ooooouchy !

Even my favorite rival on here Scott knows that. At least with him he supports his facts (although in his own twisted way) instead of bouncing around the ones posted.

........like when I posted that the Bears gave up too much for Cutler, and that Orton wasn't just a throw away player?

I never said Orton was a throw away player, only that he wasnt as good as Cutler. So yes, I will still take Cutler and Knox(who was selected with the 5th pick gained from Denver and both became instant big time difference makers on offense) over Orton and some mystery player draft pick.

Mostly only Bear fan rivals and Denver fans thought they gave up too much. And when it all pans out that will continue to be the case.

[Scott Campbell]

Re: Ooooouchy !

Even my favorite rival on here Scott knows that. At least with him he supports his facts (although in his own twisted way) instead of bouncing around the ones posted.

........like when I posted that the Bears gave up too much for Cutler, and that Orton wasn't just a throw away player?

I never said Orton was a throw away player, only that he wasnt as good as Cutler. So yes, I will still take Cutler and Knox(who was selected with the 5th pick gained from Denver and both became instant big time difference makers on offense) over Orton and some mystery player draft pick.

Mostly only Bear fan rivals and Denver fans thought they gave up too much. And when it all pans out that will continue to be the case.

Player? As in singular?


WRONG!!!!

[Dabaddestbear]

Face facts. No one said what you were posting about, it was the simple fact that you werent' here. You didn't disappear till the bears lost.

And, what is even funnier is that you now claim you only show when their is bear talk. As if we didn't talk about the bears and their losing.

Just remember, the packers beat the bears, the bears are not continuously improving, and the packers aren't declining, but are improving and have a BETTER record than the bears.

As for lead into gold, i think that metaphor works best about your posts regarding the awesome bears. Keep it up. maybe someday you will have a good team and get back to the superbowl. Geez, what has it been...20 plus years. One appearance in the superbowl. PATHETIC. Ummm, Two Appearances kid. I guess you stop watching football at some point.

Wow, I am dealing with a slow one here i see...lol.

Find one post where I said the Bears were great or as you so lamely put it.."Awesome"..lol.
Oh, and that trip to the SB most recently taken by the Bears..Packers are the team still trying to just win a Playoff game (IF they ever find a way to get there). So lets not look in the recent past for the Bears although not great, have been better or at least equal to the Packers.

Ok, can I please have a conversation with the adult Packer fans again please.

[Dabaddestbear]

Re: Ooooouchy !

Even my favorite rival on here Scott knows that. At least with him he supports his facts (although in his own twisted way) instead of bouncing around the ones posted.

........like when I posted that the Bears gave up too much for Cutler, and that Orton wasn't just a throw away player?

I never said Orton was a throw away player, only that he wasnt as good as Cutler. So yes, I will still take Cutler and Knox(who was selected with the 5th pick gained from Denver and both became instant big time difference makers on offense) over Orton and some mystery player draft pick.

Mostly only Bear fan rivals and Denver fans thought they gave up too much. And when it all pans out that will continue to be the case.

Player? As in singular?


WRONG!!!!

Ok, 2 PLAYERS, because one draft pick was only swapped for another one in which Knox was acquired. Now tell me which player have they picked with a draft pick this year is having a bigger impact than Knox? Remains to be seen if they will get one that compares next year.

Thanks for bringing that to the light.

[Scott Campbell]

Dude, Angelo traded Orton, 2 first rounders and a 3rd rounder for Cutler and a 5th rounder. Period.

Knox was a separate transaction. And your spin is just rationalization.

[ThunderDan]

Dude, Angelo traded Orton, 2 first rounders and a 3rd rounder for Cutler and a 5th rounder. Period.

Knox was a separate transaction. And your spin is just rationalization.

Just like the people who say we got Brohm for C Williams.

[ThunderDan]

We got a 2nd rounder for Williams.

Favre's retirement made us draft Brohm in the 2nd round.

[Scott Campbell]

We got a 2nd rounder for Williams.

Favre's retirement made us draft Brohm in the 2nd round.

Damn Ted and those "need" picks.

[Dabaddestbear]

Dude, Angelo traded Orton, 2 first rounders and a 3rd rounder for Cutler and a 5th rounder. Period.

Knox was a separate transaction. And your spin is just rationalization.

they traded 5th rounders Scott. No spin JUST PURE FACTS.

Oh yeah you are right, they got 3 more players than the Bears in the trade, all of which were draft picks, NONE of which has or may ever have a big as impact game in game out as KNOX.

[mraynrand]

[Pugger]

Re: Ooooouchy !

TY ! This must be a trying game for real packer fans, with Lord Favre returning to his former house to play his old team. Do you think he is holding a grudge ? Will he meet n greet his old team mates ? After he leads his new team to victory, will the packer players even talk to him ? I normaly dont watch packer games, but this one I plan on seeing !

Of course he is holding a grudge, thats the only reason he came back to the Vikings so he could play the Packers. I'm sure he will briefly talk to Driver, Clifton, among others but sure won't see him talking to Rodgers.

Sorry but I think this is a giant crock of shit. Are you telling the main factor wasn't 12 million and the fact he knew he could still play, which is obvious to anyone who isn't blind? Sure he thinks TT is an asshole, who doesn't? (kidding guys).

Why didn't he just stay with the Jets then? He knew what he is doing, he wanted to go to the Vikings during the 08 season but of course TT wouldn't trade him to a rival. Favre has plenty of money, shit TT even offered him 20 million to stay retired so I'm sorry but your excuses are a giant crock of shit.

If all BF wanted to do was play football he should have honored his contract and stayed in NY. He still had at least a year on that contract but he figured if he 'retires' yet again NY will more than likely draft a QB and then he can ask them for his release. NY has been known to cut players outright who still have value and get nothing in return. After his release BF began negotiations in earnest with MN after his surgery, a team he had been talking to for a couple of years now.