Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

They'll take'em down when it counts.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Originally posted by MadtownPacker
    I love how so many of you lames talk about Starr like you actually seen him play. Obviously he was a great QB and won more rings. That I have learned from reading here and other sites. I never witnessed it. How can any of us judge who was better if we where wearing diapers in the last 40 years??

    Couldnt agree more. Its insane to compare players from different times. Specially ones that played while we still didnt allow blacks to play very much. Hell, for the little selfishness Favre has show, why do we have a statue of Lombardi outside the stadium, that dude was RACIST!

    Comment


    • #77
      Originally posted by g4orce
      Originally posted by MadtownPacker
      I love how so many of you lames talk about Starr like you actually seen him play. Obviously he was a great QB and won more rings. That I have learned from reading here and other sites. I never witnessed it. How can any of us judge who was better if we where wearing diapers in the last 40 years??

      Couldnt agree more. Its insane to compare players from different times. Specially ones that played while we still didnt allow blacks to play very much. Hell, for the little selfishness Favre has show, why do we have a statue of Lombardi outside the stadium, that dude was RACIST!

      Hi Tank!

      Comment


      • #78
        Originally posted by g4orce
        Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns

        Starr is classy. I don't suspect you understand that concept.

        As talented as Favre? You mean like Elway? Or Brady? Or Peyton? Take it down a notch Don King.

        yeah, shame on the packer org and coaches for not harnessing Bert. Agreed. Personal responsibility be damned.

        My god, why would we expect him to show some self discipline? After all, he never showed any in his personal life.

        While Starr may be classy and I respect him for that, he doesnt belong in the same sentence with Favre as in throwing a football.

        I'll give you Elway and Manning, but Brady belongs with Bradshaw, Aikman, Montana as guys who just had great teams surrounding them.

        Guys like Favre, Elway, Marino are QB's that we've never seen before. I put Favre at the of the talent heap because in his day he moved a lot better than Elway and Marino and probably could out throw both as in arm strength. Watch the highlights of him in the mid 90's and its stuff you've never seen from a QB before. And probably never will.
        And bert doesn't belong in the same sentence as Starr for being clutch, making good decisions, being a great teammate, etc.

        There is more to being a great QB than throwing the ball. Jeff George is that you posting under G4orce?

        Brady? Great teams. Maybe you need to look at who was on the offense of some of those great teams. LOL And, you put Montana below Favre. Guess "the catch" was on a great team. LOL

        Dude, you wanna talk about a guy with a great team? That fellow's name is Bert. Remind us again how he led us to the SB with a 9-7 team? Or how like elway he led an lesser talented team to the SB multiple times. Remind us again how Bert put the team on his back and willed us to the SB.

        Favre moved better than Elway. Dude, you really are embarrasing yourself. Elway had 10 or 11 seasons rushing over 200 yards, and went over 300 once. Bert had ONE season over 200 yards.

        The fiction you have created is outstanding. Better arm than elway or marino. LOL Plenty of guys have had cannons before. You act like suddenly there were no great QBs before Favre, Elway and Marino. Yikes.

        Must be nice to conveniently forget Fouts, Moon, Anderson, Kelly, etc.

        I watched every game of Berts. And unlike you, based on your post, have watched Moon, Fouts, Bradshaw, Staubach, Stabler, Moon, etc.

        Comment


        • #79
          Originally posted by Scott Campbell
          Originally posted by g4orce
          Originally posted by MadtownPacker
          I love how so many of you lames talk about Starr like you actually seen him play. Obviously he was a great QB and won more rings. That I have learned from reading here and other sites. I never witnessed it. How can any of us judge who was better if we where wearing diapers in the last 40 years??

          Couldnt agree more. Its insane to compare players from different times. Specially ones that played while we still didnt allow blacks to play very much. Hell, for the little selfishness Favre has show, why do we have a statue of Lombardi outside the stadium, that dude was RACIST!

          Hi Tank!

          Huh?

          Comment


          • #80
            Originally posted by Scott Campbell
            Originally posted by g4orce
            Originally posted by MadtownPacker
            I love how so many of you lames talk about Starr like you actually seen him play. Obviously he was a great QB and won more rings. That I have learned from reading here and other sites. I never witnessed it. How can any of us judge who was better if we where wearing diapers in the last 40 years??

            Couldnt agree more. Its insane to compare players from different times. Specially ones that played while we still didnt allow blacks to play very much. Hell, for the little selfishness Favre has show, why do we have a statue of Lombardi outside the stadium, that dude was RACIST!

            Hi Tank!
            Fuck me.

            Comment


            • #81
              Originally posted by MadtownPacker
              I love how so many of you lames talk about Starr like you actually seen him play. Obviously he was a great QB and won more rings. That I have learned from reading here and other sites. I never witnessed it. How can any of us judge who was better if we where wearing diapers in the last 40 years??
              I saw Starr play - not in person but on television. And I've done a lot of reading as well.

              My opinion is that if you gave me a choice between Starr and Favre, I'd take Starr. Favre has been on talented teams and thrown picks, trying to make the big play. Starr did not make the same kinds of mistakes. He didn't have Favre's arm, for sure. He didn't improvise as well. But I'd take Starr in a big game over Favre.

              Until this year, so far. How strange that Favre, after all these years, is finally learning how to play smart. This was the way I wished he'd played for all those Packer years.

              And please don't bother with "he doesn't have to take chances any more." That argument is essentially saying he'd have been better if he had better teammates. But Favre made choices about how to play. Ernie Banks often played on sucky teams but he still played well. If you're going to say Favre is so great then you shouldn't have to excuse his bonehead interceptions.
              "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

              KYPack

              Comment


              • #82
                Bert was more elusive in the pocket than Elway, but was slower and a much less effective runner. Elway threw a cleaner, more accurate long ball than Bert. The teams Elway willed to Superbowls were pretty decent (except maybe that 1989 team). The question is whether Dallas and San Fran in 1993-1995 were better than Cleveland in 1986-87, etc. I think Dallas and San Fran were tougher to get by than Cleveland.
                "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                Comment


                • #83
                  Originally posted by g4orce

                  Hell, for the little selfishness Favre has show, why do we have a statue of Lombardi outside the stadium, that dude was RACIST!
                  Have you lost your mind, son? Lombardi was one of the first GMs to bring a black player onto the team and when the team hotel one night didn't want to allow his black player to stay, he turned the whole team right around and left.

                  Read this page out of Lombardi's biography, When Pride Still Mattered
                  . It pretty well sums things up in one page.

                  From the Pulitzer Prize–winning author of Path Lit by Lightning comes a groundbreaking biography that captures all of football great Vince Lombardi: the myth, the man, his game, and his God.More than any other sports figure, Vince Lombardi transformed football into a metaphor of the American experience. The son of an Italian immigrant butcher, Lombardi toiled for twenty frustrating years as a high school coach and then as an assistant at Fordham, West Point, and the New York Giants before his big break came at age forty-six with the chance to coach a struggling team in snowbound Wisconsin. His leadership of the Green Bay Packers to five world championships in nine seasons is the most storied period in NFL history. Lombardi became a living legend, a symbol to many of leadership, discipline, perseverance, and teamwork, and to others of an obsession with winning.
                  "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Originally posted by mraynrand
                    Bert was more elusive in the pocket than Elway, but was slower and a much less effective runner. Elway threw a cleaner, more accurate long ball than Bert. The teams Elway willed to Superbowls were pretty decent (except maybe that 1989 team). The question is whether Dallas and San Fran in 1993-1995 were better than Cleveland in 1986-87, etc. I think Dallas and San Fran were tougher to get by than Cleveland.
                    What about later. The sherman years? the MM years. RR year. What about willing us one of those years?

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Originally posted by mraynrand
                      Bert was more elusive in the pocket than Elway, but was slower and a much less effective runner. Elway threw a cleaner, more accurate long ball than Bert. The teams Elway willed to Superbowls were pretty decent (except maybe that 1989 team). The question is whether Dallas and San Fran in 1993-1995 were better than Cleveland in 1986-87, etc. I think Dallas and San Fran were tougher to get by than Cleveland.
                      It wasn't only Elway willing his teams to the SB, Bowlen was cheating on the salary cap when they won.

                      sigpic

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X