MM and Capers engage in crazy talk

[MOBB DEEP]

Fatboy says that the Defensive staff feels that the cowgirls have the best offense that the Pack has played to date as far as it's ability to run and throw

Is he taking suttle shot at Chad/bengals and/or favre/Vikes? Or mere gamesmanship?

Sour grapes?

who's better vikes or dallas?

[MOBB DEEP]

Re: MM and Capers engage in crazy talk

oops

[Waldo]

Re: MM and Capers engage in crazy talk

Fatboy says that the Defensive staff feels that the cowgirls have the best offense that the Pack has played to date as far as it's ability to run and throw

Is he taking suttle shot at Chad/bengals and/or favre/Vikes? Or mere gamesmanship?

who's better vikes or dallas?

I have the defenses ranked:

Chicago at 26th
Cincy at 4th
St Louis at 30th
Minnesota at 24th
Detroit at 31st
Cleveland at 25th
Tampa at 29th
Dallas at 10th

Using my schedule corrected power rankings program.

[gbgary]

it's a shot at the vikes. they're very bitter.

[Maxie the Taxi]

Stubby is very impressed by a team's ability to produce "explosive" plays.

I don't know if there are stats kept on "explosive" plays by anyone other than Stubby, but if I had to bet, I'd bet Dallas has more explosive plays off the pass and the run than any team in the league -- including Minnesota.

[LEWCWA]

Stubby is very impressed by a team's ability to produce "explosive" plays.

I don't know if there are stats kept on "explosive" plays by anyone other than Stubby, but if I had to bet, I'd bet Dallas has more explosive plays off the pass and the run than any team in the league -- including Minnesota.

I think Greenbay may have the most explosive plays in the NFL, but the have the most negative plays as well. i.e. huge problems holding leads, sustaining drives, winning games!

[3irty1]

Re: MM and Capers engage in crazy talk

Fatboy says that the Defensive staff feels that the cowgirls have the best offense that the Pack has played to date as far as it's ability to run and throw

Is he taking suttle shot at Chad/bengals and/or favre/Vikes? Or mere gamesmanship?

who's better vikes or dallas?

I have the defenses ranked:

Chicago at 26th
Cincy at 4th
St Louis at 30th
Minnesota at 24th
Detroit at 31st
Cleveland at 25th
Tampa at 29th
Dallas at 10th

Using my schedule corrected power rankings program.

I don't get it. He's talking about offensive rankings.

[pbmax]

The Bengals score 22.5 points per game. They should not be in the discussion.

Vikings at 30.5 and Cowboys at 27.1.

Vikes have the edge there but M3 qualified it for both running and passing attacks. And the NFL, without much to show for it, has decided to bottle up Purple Jesus and see if Favre can beat them. Teams have controlled All Day. So far Brett is up to the task. Not many people scheme to stop Chester Taylor. Shiancoe might be the next best weapon, if not, its Sidney Rice.

Dallas has Jones, Barber and Choice at RB. Roy Williams, Crayton and Austin at WR. Witten and Martellus Bennett at TE. Dallas has faced better defenses. There does not seem to be a lot of room for argument from a talent standpoint: Cowboys. For straight point output so far, Vikes have the edge.

If it was a playoff game, I would advise to bet the under.

[Cleft Crusty]

Stubby is very impressed by a team's ability to produce "explosive" plays.

I don't know if there are stats kept on "explosive" plays by anyone other than Stubby, but if I had to bet, I'd bet Dallas has more explosive plays off the pass and the run than any team in the league -- including Minnesota.

I think Greenbay may have the most explosive plays in the NFL, but the have the most negative plays as well. i.e. huge problems holding leads, sustaining drives, winning games!

I took too much stool softener and now have explosive diarrhea.

[Waldo]

Re: MM and Capers engage in crazy talk

Fatboy says that the Defensive staff feels that the cowgirls have the best offense that the Pack has played to date as far as it's ability to run and throw

Is he taking suttle shot at Chad/bengals and/or favre/Vikes? Or mere gamesmanship?

who's better vikes or dallas?

I have the defenses ranked:

Chicago at 26th
Cincy at 4th
St Louis at 30th
Minnesota at 24th
Detroit at 31st
Cleveland at 25th
Tampa at 29th
Dallas at 10th

Using my schedule corrected power rankings program.

I don't get it. He's talking about offensive rankings.

LOL, I'm an idiot. Yeah. I have the Vikes ranked 3rd and Dallas 5th.

[mngolf19]

The Bengals score 22.5 points per game. They should not be in the discussion.

Vikings at 30.5 and Cowboys at 27.1.

Vikes have the edge there but M3 qualified it for both running and passing attacks. And the NFL, without much to show for it, has decided to bottle up Purple Jesus and see if Favre can beat them. Teams have controlled All Day. So far Brett is up to the task. Not many people scheme to stop Chester Taylor. Shiancoe might be the next best weapon, if not, its Sidney Rice.

Dallas has Jones, Barber and Choice at RB. Roy Williams, Crayton and Austin at WR. Witten and Martellus Bennett at TE. Dallas has faced better defenses. There does not seem to be a lot of room for argument from a talent standpoint: Cowboys. For straight point output so far, Vikes have the edge.

If it was a playoff game, I would advise to bet the under.

Not only do I think Dallas is less talented than Vikes(and on both sides of the ball), I wouldn't put them in top 4 of NFC. Now, are they still a dangerous team, absolutely. They will be lucky to win their division though.

[Bossman641]

Re: MM and Capers engage in crazy talk

Fatboy says that the Defensive staff feels that the cowgirls have the best offense that the Pack has played to date as far as it's ability to run and throw

Is he taking suttle shot at Chad/bengals and/or favre/Vikes? Or mere gamesmanship?

Sour grapes?

who's better vikes or dallas?

Isn't it also possible that he simply thinks the Cowboy offense is better? They have 3 very good RB's. Romo has been playing very well as of late. Austin and Witten are formidable receivers.

Not everything has to be about the Vikings.

[pbmax]

The Bengals score 22.5 points per game. They should not be in the discussion.

Vikings at 30.5 and Cowboys at 27.1.

Vikes have the edge there but M3 qualified it for both running and passing attacks. And the NFL, without much to show for it, has decided to bottle up Purple Jesus and see if Favre can beat them. Teams have controlled All Day. So far Brett is up to the task. Not many people scheme to stop Chester Taylor. Shiancoe might be the next best weapon, if not, its Sidney Rice.

Dallas has Jones, Barber and Choice at RB. Roy Williams, Crayton and Austin at WR. Witten and Martellus Bennett at TE. Dallas has faced better defenses. There does not seem to be a lot of room for argument from a talent standpoint: Cowboys. For straight point output so far, Vikes have the edge.

If it was a playoff game, I would advise to bet the under.

Not only do I think Dallas is less talented than Vikes(and on both sides of the ball), I wouldn't put them in top 4 of NFC. Now, are they still a dangerous team, absolutely. They will be lucky to win their division though.

Well we weren't talking defenses, so lets put that aside for a second. You believe the Vikings have more talent on O than the Cowboys? I think its close, but I don't think either is far from the other. And neither is fourth in the NFC.

[Packgator]

Re: MM and Capers engage in crazy talk

Is he taking suttle shot at Chad/bengals and/or favre/Vikes?

Sour grapes?

No and No.

[MadScientist]

Re: MM and Capers engage in crazy talk

Fatboy says that the Defensive staff feels that the cowgirls have the best offense that the Pack has played to date as far as it's ability to run and throw

Is he taking suttle shot at Chad/bengals and/or favre/Vikes? Or mere gamesmanship?

Sour grapes?

who's better vikes or dallas?

Vikes are better, but Dallas is on the schedule this week. It's anti locker room fodder.

Unlike the Dallas guy who was saying the Packers are cracking up.