The more and more I think about this the more it kind of dawns on me. A lot of people are forgetting one important fact. With all of the knowledgeable posters on this board it's really surprising to me that I have not seen one person mention this yet, and I apologize if someone has.
Yes the Packers allowed 4 sacks and had a slew of holding penalties(probably the biggest indication of them being whipped), but they were facing probably the second best defensive line in the NFL. Ratliff and Ware are sure-fire pro-bowlers and Spencer, Bowen, Olshanksy are pretty good as well. We actually averaged 3.8 yards per rush against a defensive line who is not only more talented than our offensive line across the board, but also much bigger.
While the taste of kool-aid is still strong in my mouth, I can't help but think the Packers offensive line actually played a good game against better opponents and maybe, MAYBE, had their best game of the season. Could this possibly be the start of something better? Or just an apparition?
Insight, analysis, and even go-to-hells are appreciated. I'd like to hear other's thoughts on this.
Yes the Packers allowed 4 sacks and had a slew of holding penalties(probably the biggest indication of them being whipped), but they were facing probably the second best defensive line in the NFL. Ratliff and Ware are sure-fire pro-bowlers and Spencer, Bowen, Olshanksy are pretty good as well. We actually averaged 3.8 yards per rush against a defensive line who is not only more talented than our offensive line across the board, but also much bigger.
While the taste of kool-aid is still strong in my mouth, I can't help but think the Packers offensive line actually played a good game against better opponents and maybe, MAYBE, had their best game of the season. Could this possibly be the start of something better? Or just an apparition?
Insight, analysis, and even go-to-hells are appreciated. I'd like to hear other's thoughts on this.




Comment