Tweet
I don't have the ESPN insider, but the headline said that the Packers are a strong landing spot for Bush in 2010. I, for one, would be thrilled. Bush is a HUUUUUUGE upgrade over Grant. I wonder what kind of contract he would be wanting?
-
-
I wouldn't trade the farm for him. He'd help on punt and kick returns, but I don't know if he really fits our style. Grant looked pretty good yesterday.One time Lombardi was disgusted with the team in practice and told them they were going to have to start with the basics. He held up a ball and said: "This is a football." McGee immediately called out, "Stop, coach, you're going too fast," and that gave everyone a laugh.
John Maxymuk, Packers By The Numbers -
Reggie Bush is not an every down back. He'd compliment Grant, not replace him.Comment
-
I'd rather have CJ Spiller, but I suppose Bush wouldn't cost us a draft pick.</delurk>Comment
-
Bush is exactly what this team needs, a big time player maker. Bush is that threat out of the backfield we need on passing downs. Would also add to punt/kick returns.
Honestly I don't see the Saints letting him go unless he is demanding too much. C.J. Spiller would also be a great pickup if we had the chance to draft him.
Comment
-
I'm not really sure our "style" (running wise at least) is the kind that we really need to be modeling anything after.Originally posted by Maxie the Taxi
Grant looked decent but he still doesn't make any plays.
Gotta agree with Lurker, though... CJ Spiller would be bigtime next year.Comment
-
Bush is better if he stays off the grass
Teams like the Vikes and Colts would be an interesting landingTERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWERComment
-
We almost got him the first time round.
"I've got one word for you- Dallas, Texas, Super Bowl"- Jermichael FinleyComment
-
Bush would be good to have NOW...not so sure he's the guy you want if you actually get a capable OL. He's a liability between the tackles.My signature has NUDITY in it...whatcha gonna do?Comment
-
Ziggy said yesterday that we cannot have separate threads for other players, so please take this elsewhere. I've contacted the admin about creating a not-current-packer thread.Comment
-
I don't understand this. I've never seen this cat play, but Wiki tells me he's shorter and skinnier than Bush. At best they'd have equal speed as Bush is like lightning. Bush played much tougher opposition and carried a team in college. What has Spiller done? I just don't see this cat stacking up favorably to Reggie, who was a freak of a prospect.Originally posted by missionComment
-
Originally posted by Partial
First off, the post is kind of crappy.
Secondly, and I didn't see wherever that was written by ziggy....but I don't think that is a rule and if it was I would not at all agree with it.
Third, IMO a non packer thread would suck. This may be a packer forum but it's also a NFL forum.TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWERComment
-
Agreed. Ziggy was outrageous and completely out of line yesterday telling people what and who they can post about.Originally posted by BretskyComment
-
the thread is about the packers rumored interest in him next yearOriginally posted by Partial
the packers
get it ???
and get a clue when it comes to cj spillerComment
-
I'm not going to copy and paste the article but this guy on a Saints board did.
Comment
Comment