Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Saints Or Packers: Who Would Win?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Saints Or Packers: Who Would Win?

    Saints Or Packers: Who Would Win?


    Contributor Written on December 12, 2009
    LANDOVER, MD - DECEMBER 06: Quarterback Drew Brees #9 of the New Orleans Saints gives instructions against the Washington Redskins on December 6, 2009 at FedExField in Landover, Maryland. (Photo by Chris McGrath/Getty Images) Chris McGrath/Getty Images

    Lately I have been under the impression that the Green Bay Packers are going to be the Super Bowl winners. I just watch them play and the seem so dominant, despite their upset loss to Tampa. I got some team stats together to see who would have the edge.

    This is what I came up with.

    Packers:
    Total Defense: 1st 273.5
    Passing Defense: 3rd 180.2
    Rushing Defense: 4th 87.2
    Total Offense: 6th 379.3
    Passing Offense: 8th 262.2
    Rushing Offense: 13th 117.1
    Points Scored: 7th 323
    Points Allowed: 8th 233
    Opponent Toughness: 85-96


    Saints:
    Total Defense: 18th 343.9
    Passing Defense: 22nd 230.0
    Rushing Defense: 20th 113.9
    Total Offense: 1st 429.0
    Passing Offense: 3rd 286.4
    Rushing Offense: 5th 142.6
    Points Scored: 1st 440
    Points Allowed: 16th 251
    Opponent Toughness: 76-116



    Of all of these stats I am most impressed with the Packers' passing defense. They exist in a division filled with air games. Brett Favre taking over Minnesota, Peterson is a lot less of a factor now. Matthew Stafford to Johnson in Detroit, they are a more successful offense than they seem; and Jay Cutler in Chicago, they like to throw the ball, but haven't been getting the job done very well. 6 games out of Green Bay's season goes from this.

    Next, New Orleans has the 20th ranked rush defense. Ouch. But is that a complement or embarrassing. As I said for the Packers in being in a division of passing teams; the Saints too are in a division where the teams strive well. Twice a year they have to go up against Michael Turner who is the center of the Falcons' offense, then play the Carolina rushing duo twice a year. I'm not sure if I should look down on their ranking, or if I should consider them lucky to be as high as they are.

    There is only a 9 game difference in their schedule difficulty, favoring Green Bay; but you have to remember that the Saints are the undefeated team. I think it could be deceiving since the Pack came along as a well-rounded team late this season. Their rookies are finally producing, and the offensive line has decided to protect Rodgers for a change.

    All in all what I get out of it is...

    The Packers #1 defense against the Saints #1 offense. Seems like a fair matchup right?

    Well, how about the Saints 18th defense against the Packers #6 Offense?

    That isn't to say that it would be a blowout, but in number talk Packers Win (38-35)

    There is no doubt it would be a high scoring game, but my statements about Green Bay being underrated seem very accurate after doing some research.

    --------------------

    Personally, Snake likes this article. We'd match up well with the Saints as they don't play good D, and the Saints haven't met Dom Capers' blitzing zone LB scheme yet.

    I'd rather face them in the playoffs then Minn. again.
    Snake's Twitter comments would be LEGENDARY.........if I was ugly or gave a shit about Twitter.

  • #2
    Played in New Orleans the Saints win. Played in Green Bay the Packers win, especially if the field and weather conditions are less than perfect. But on a fast field in a controlled climate I couldn't see the Packers over the Saints.
    Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to grow

    Comment


    • #3
      MM would get out-coached BIG Time. Saints by 3 scores.
      Lombardi told Starr to "Run it, and let's get the hell out of here!" - 'Ice Bowl' December 31, 1967

      Comment


      • #4
        In GB the Pack would have a shot

        In a gooed climate or a dome I just think the Saints would expose our secondary. Too many weapons.

        Losing Harris really hurts against a deeper weapon team. I can't see us being able to cover teams like the Saints and Colts when you'd have to rely on guys like Atari Bigby, Bush, and the others.
        TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

        Comment


        • #5
          Gotta agree with the others. Packers win outdoors, but Saints win in the dome. That offense is built for turf. The big problem we would have is Bush and Underwood matching up with their 3 and 4 WR. Plus their defense plays much better at home when they have the crowd behind them going wild.
          Go PACK

          Comment


          • #6
            I agree with the article that the Packers are underrated, but I still think the Saints would beat them, especially at the Superdome. What impresses me the most about them is their amazing comeback ability, as they showed against Washington and especially against the Dolphins--both on the road.
            Teamwork is what the Green Bay Packers were all about. They didn't do it for individual glory. They did it because they loved one another.
            Vince Lombardi

            Comment


            • #7
              If TTT would have drafted my favorite Meachem over Sally Justine Harrell it'd be closer
              TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Bretsky
                If TTT would have drafted my favorite Meachem over Sally Justine Harrell it'd be closer
                With the impatience on this forum, he'd of been run out of town before he could blossom into anything worthwhile.
                "I've got one word for you- Dallas, Texas, Super Bowl"- Jermichael Finley

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by BallHawk
                  Originally posted by Bretsky
                  If TTT would have drafted my favorite Meachem over Sally Justine Harrell it'd be closer
                  With the impatience on this forum, he'd of been run out of town before he could blossom into anything worthwhile.


                  I'd have had his back ..........lol......and while the forum would have been all over me for a couple years

                  Right now they just might be claiming the curse of Bretsky is a fallacy

                  Robert Meachem- 09 touchdown machine
                  TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Packers D would need to get an immediate rush up the middle. I am not sure Pickett could do it, but Raji could. I think the D could give the O a chance even in the dome. The offense would need to deliver on each opportunity.
                    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      This brings me to the point I was discussing with a few friends the other day. Domes are bullshit. They bring an unfair advantage ..plus football is a game meant for the outdoors.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by steve823
                        This brings me to the point I was discussing with a few friends the other day. Domes are bullshit. They bring an unfair advantage ..plus football is a game meant for the outdoors.
                        Agreed, football should be played outside no matter what the elements. Domes are a travesty to football. This is what sets football apart from any other sport. I offer this example...



                        One of my favorite bits of all time.
                        "I firmly believe that any man's finest hour, the greatest fulfillment of all that he holds dear, is that moment when he has worked his heart out in a good cause and lies exhausted on the field of battle - victorious." - Vince Lombardi

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Packers win 4-2.

                          Edit: In Overtime.
                          </delurk>

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by sheepshead
                            MM would get out-coached BIG Time. Saints by 3 scores.
                            winner

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Yeah we just aren't solid enough from an execution standpoint. You know where I stand with that as far as who's responsible (already been noted here).

                              Their defense doesn't really intimidate me though (we should be able to put up points) but DC would have to come up with one helluva scheme to be able to match up with them personnel wise.

                              Hopefully we get a chance to find out come playoffs!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X