he's hit like 19 in a row or something like that. having a great year.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Can we finally say CROSBY HAS TO GO?
Collapse
X
-
I still agree with Mike.Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers View PostI agree with Mike.
Mike Vandermause column: Green Bay Packers shouldn't give up on K Mason Crosby
"There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Comment
-
He was never as bad as his stats--or as bad as people made him out to be. He kicked more in terrible conditions than other kickers and McStubby never turned down the opportunity to put him out there in iffy situations (long FGs, FGs in bad conditions). That's the argument I made at the time, and I think the argument was correct. He's gone from being a solid kicker to being a great kicker this year. I never understood why people wanted to run him out of town. His leg on kickoffs has always been above average (when they didn't decide to make him kick directionally), and he's perhaps the best onside kicker I've ever seen. His kicking stats were ordinary, but considering the circumstances they were at least acceptable. I get that he didn't appear to be a clutch kicker, but I never totally bought into that either. Sure, he was like 1 for 4 on game ending, game winning kicks--but he had made plenty of pressure kicks before. Kind of reminds me of the stat that the Packers don't win close games--judged by those games that are within four points or less.Originally posted by PaCkFan_n_MD View PostNot really. I think it has a very fitting title for when it was made. He was never a bad kicker, but he wasn't all that great either. He has sure seemed to turn the corner though. I was very impressed yesterday."There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Comment
-
I completely agree with you. But he seems to have put it together around the same time the rest of the team did last year. No one I would rather have right now.Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers View PostHe was never as bad as his stats--or as bad as people made him out to be. He kicked more in terrible conditions than other kickers and McStubby never turned down the opportunity to put him out there in iffy situations (long FGs, FGs in bad conditions). That's the argument I made at the time, and I think the argument was correct. He's gone from being a solid kicker to being a great kicker this year. I never understood why people wanted to run him out of town. His leg on kickoffs has always been above average (when they didn't decide to make him kick directionally), and he's perhaps the best onside kicker I've ever seen. His kicking stats were ordinary, but considering the circumstances they were at least acceptable. I get that he didn't appear to be a clutch kicker, but I never totally bought into that either. Sure, he was like 1 for 4 on game ending, game winning kicks--but he had made plenty of pressure kicks before. Kind of reminds me of the stat that the Packers don't win close games--judged by those games that are within four points or less.Draft Brandin Cooks WR OSU!
Comment
-
I definately have hate for Crosby and still think he will miss everytime he runs out there. That being said he is having a great year.Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.
Comment
-



Comment