Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Another JSO Non-Story Story

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Another JSO Non-Story Story

    Originally posted by ThunderDan
    Originally posted by MJZiggy
    Originally posted by Cleft Crusty
    Originally posted by MJZiggy
    PR used to do stories like that. If we can come up with stuff like that, you'd think "professionals" would spit out quality without thinking about it.
    Cleft Crusty's columns were always top notch. The Urinal Scented has really tanked in the past several years....
    Agreed. Ziggy's post-game summaries kicked ass as well and Winners and Losers always showed Nutz's genius (and started some fantastic discussions)
    AAhhhmmm.... I did the Studs and Duds column last year and no one ever mentions that!

    Thank you Dan. I read them all.

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Another JSO Non-Story Story

      Originally posted by Scott Campbell
      Originally posted by ThunderDan
      Originally posted by MJZiggy
      Originally posted by Cleft Crusty
      Originally posted by MJZiggy
      PR used to do stories like that. If we can come up with stuff like that, you'd think "professionals" would spit out quality without thinking about it.
      Cleft Crusty's columns were always top notch. The Urinal Scented has really tanked in the past several years....
      Agreed. Ziggy's post-game summaries kicked ass as well and Winners and Losers always showed Nutz's genius (and started some fantastic discussions)
      AAhhhmmm.... I did the Studs and Duds column last year and no one ever mentions that!

      Thank you Dan. I read them all.
      Who the hell hacked your account? What have you done with Scott!

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Another JSO Non-Story Story

        Originally posted by retailguy

        Who the hell hacked your account? What have you done with Scott!


        I thought I had a history of being thankful for those here who provide content - be it pictures or articles. I guess I need to work on that.

        Comment


        • #19
          Well, that article was enlightening in one respect - I didn't realize to what extent Jody had become the #4 WR. At the beginning of the season, it really looked like we had a 1a and 1b receiver in Driver and Jenning, and a #3 and #4 that were very close together.

          Now it seems like the #3 and #4 WR's have flipped. Is that because Nelson is on KR duty, and it cuts into his WR time? I was a little surprised to see that Jones has been targeted 3x as much as him these past few games.
          --
          Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Guiness
            Well, that article was enlightening in one respect - I didn't realize to what extent Jody had become the #4 WR. At the beginning of the season, it really looked like we had a 1a and 1b receiver in Driver and Jenning, and a #3 and #4 that were very close together.

            Now it seems like the #3 and #4 WR's have flipped. Is that because Nelson is on KR duty, and it cuts into his WR time? I was a little surprised to see that Jones has been targeted 3x as much as him these past few games.
            Nelson had the knee injury a few weeks ago, and since then Jones seems to have moved into, and held, the #3 spot.


            Either of those guys are capable of 60 catches a year and 1,000 yards but with Driver, Jennings and Finley on pace to get about 3,000 yards, it just leaves about 1,250 to be split up between Nelson, Jones, Donald Lee and the running backs. I don't really think it's their fault, just not enough footballs to go around. And the way they are running teh ball, it would be a sin not to keep running it. That's just the way it's going this season, a good problem to have, but not a good reflection of the talent of our #3 and #4 receivers.
            Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

            Comment


            • #21
              If we could get a star OL with a comparable contract, I'd honestly trade Jennings. We have more talent at WR than we do OL and Jennings is obviously our hottest piece. It would have to be a really good LT though, and age 26 or younger. I think a move like that would balance out our offense now and for the next few years. There probably isn't a team in the league with a good enough LT that they'd be willing to trade though.
              Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by JustinHarrell
                Either of those guys are capable of 60 catches a year and 1,000 yards but with Driver, Jennings and Finley on pace to get about 3,000 yards, it just leaves about 1,250 to be split up between Nelson, Jones, Donald Lee and the running backs.
                So the solution is, of course, to have Aaron Rodgers throw for 8,000 yards so that everybody can have enough. Someone should tell Aaron.
                </delurk>

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Lurker64
                  Originally posted by JustinHarrell
                  Either of those guys are capable of 60 catches a year and 1,000 yards but with Driver, Jennings and Finley on pace to get about 3,000 yards, it just leaves about 1,250 to be split up between Nelson, Jones, Donald Lee and the running backs.
                  So the solution is, of course, to have Aaron Rodgers throw for 8,000 yards so that everybody can have enough. Someone should tell Aaron.
                  If he did that, folks would be mad because we abandoned the run game...
                  "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X