Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Clay Matthews sack and forced fumble that got overturned

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Clay Matthews sack and forced fumble that got overturned

    Video I uploaded


    Some of you didn't get to see this so I uploaded it. The replay wasn't available on NFL.com.

    This was called a sack and force fumble on the field. The play got challenged. Then was overturned by replay. Big Ben arm got pend against the his shoulder pad then the ball fell to the ground.



    http://i49.tinypic.com/2j3f815.jpg larger picture
    0
    Yes!
    0%
    0
    No!
    0%
    0

  • #2
    Clearly a fumble, i hate the tuck rule.

    Comment


    • #3
      Didn't look anything like a pass in any way.

      Hell, I say it shouldn't even matter IF the arm is going forward. If the ball falls straight down to the ground, it wasn't much of a pass. Rule it a fumble.

      Shit's out of hand.

      Comment


      • #4
        It was a fumble, but it didn't really matter at all in the game. The Steelers punted, we got a big play from Driver (I believe), and in about two minutes we were where we would have been had they not overturned the play. I think that's the drive that Crosby missed the FG.
        "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

        Comment


        • #5
          his arm stops then get pend against shoulder pads ball falls to the ground.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
            It was a fumble, but it didn't really matter at all in the game. The Steelers punted, we got a big play from Driver (I believe), and in about two minutes we were where we would have been had they not overturned the play. I think that's the drive that Crosby missed the FG.
            so if we where at the Steelers 30 when Driver play would have been a TD instead of 40 yards

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by pack4to84
              so if we where at the Steelers 30 when Driver play would have been a TD instead of 40 yards
              What?
              "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
                Originally posted by pack4to84
                so if we where at the Steelers 30 when Driver play would have been a TD instead of 40 yards
                What?
                you said it didn't matter. But if the Packers had the ball at the Steelers 30. When Driver got his big catch it would have went for a TD instead of just 40 yards and a miss field goal.

                Comment


                • #9
                  No one can convince me this wasn't a big play. It could have swung momentum to us.

                  Instead, the Steelers got a boost. We've lived on turnovers this year.
                  One time Lombardi was disgusted with the team in practice and told them they were going to have to start with the basics. He held up a ball and said: "This is a football." McGee immediately called out, "Stop, coach, you're going too fast," and that gave everyone a laugh.
                  John Maxymuk, Packers By The Numbers

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    It was so close. However the ref called it in the game, it should have stayed. I really didn't think that thing would be reversed so I voted no. If it was coming forward, it was impossible to tell even with the frame by frame looks we got.
                    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by JustinHarrell
                      It was so close. However the ref called it in the game, it should have stayed. I really didn't think that thing would be reversed so I voted no. If it was coming forward, it was impossible to tell even with the frame by frame looks we got.
                      I mentioned this in another thread, but since you asked:

                      Ben's arm (possibly just his elbow) was moving forward, the ball was not. Like a whip, there is a delay between his arm moving and the ball going forward. The rule reads that the arm that must be going forward. Usually, when its this close (arm moves, ball doesn't) the ref will uphold the call on the field. It was a surprise it got overturned, but there will not be a letter of apology from the league on this one.
                      Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        his upper body was moving into throw motion making it look like the arm was going forward. but if you look at his arm in relation to his body, it doesn't move

                        that was a horrible call, i don't see how the ref see indisputable evidence to overrule the call

                        the telling thing is that big ben was shocked on the sideline when the call was overturned

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          With the way Ben reacted, not yelling at the ref that he was throwing, I thought he stopped his motion and was trying to reload to another WR.
                          But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

                          -Tim Harmston

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Not sure where the indisputable evidence is that is was a pass? That is so close to being either a pass or a fumble that you (at least I thought this is how the rules worked) keep the call on the field.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by pack4to84
                              you said it didn't matter. But if the Packers had the ball at the Steelers 30. When Driver got his big catch it would have went for a TD instead of just 40 yards and a miss field goal.
                              What? I'm not sure I need to point this out, but if we got the ball at the 26 yard line, we likely don't get the play to Driver. In the end, the call mattered little. Two minutes later, we had the ball 1st and 10 from the same spot on the field that we would have had it. Big deal. Bad calls are made. You'd have to be a homer to say this one affected the game much.
                              "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X