I recall in a topic here some posters had the idea that winning your division should ONLY ensure that you make the playoffs and not guarantee that you host a playoff game. I agree with this and think that playoff spots should be seeded by record and other tiebreakers after you have found the 6 playoff teams. While this wouldn't have changed the Colts decision as they already had homefield locked those up, the Cardinals most certainly would have played their starters and tried to win the game today.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Goodell reviewing sitting starters...
Collapse
X
-
Goodell reviewing sitting starters...
I recall in a topic here some posters had the idea that winning your division should ONLY ensure that you make the playoffs and not guarantee that you host a playoff game. I agree with this and think that playoff spots should be seeded by record and other tiebreakers after you have found the 6 playoff teams. While this wouldn't have changed the Colts decision as they already had homefield locked those up, the Cardinals most certainly would have played their starters and tried to win the game today.Tags: None
-
I also wouldn't mind seeing the league implementing a rule where conference teams cannot play each other during the last week of the regular season. Case in point: next week, we're gonna see two games of the same teams at the same place as we did this week. I know this isn't a common occurrence, but I just hate the idea of us having to face the same team again immediately in the playoffs.
Comment
-
Sure it does. You minimize risk. Teams do it all the time. A player is injured and plays because without him the team might miss the playoffs. Or the team doesn't play an injured player because they don't need him to win or make the playoffs...or believe that losing one game is less important than having that player healthy for an extended time.Originally posted by channthemanFootball is a violent game. Welker and Brady could have gotten hurt any week of the year. Just because it was in a "meaningless" (no such thing) game doesn't make it a bad decision to play them.Originally posted by packers11Tell that to Patriot fans today
And, yes, there are meaningless games. Once you are out of the playoffs, the games are meaningless.
Comment
-
I actually thought about that on the way home from the game today. I don't know why those teams still put out their best players though. Don't want them to get hurt so badly it turns into one of those 2 year injuries. Once statistically eliminated, teams should just forfeit the rest of their games.Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsSure it does. You minimize risk. Teams do it all the time. A player is injured and plays because without him the team might miss the playoffs. Or the team doesn't play an injured player because they don't need him to win or make the playoffs...or believe that losing one game is less important than having that player healthy for an extended time.Originally posted by channthemanFootball is a violent game. Welker and Brady could have gotten hurt any week of the year. Just because it was in a "meaningless" (no such thing) game doesn't make it a bad decision to play them.Originally posted by packers11Tell that to Patriot fans today
And, yes, there are meaningless games. Once you are out of the playoffs, the games are meaningless.
Comment
-
Well, they aren't meaningless for the org. You implement offense/defense. You evaluate players, you develop young players, etc.Originally posted by channthemanI actually thought about that on the way home from the game today. I don't know why those teams still put out their best players though. Don't want them to get hurt so badly it turns into one of those 2 year injuries. Once statistically eliminated, teams should just forfeit the rest of their games.Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsSure it does. You minimize risk. Teams do it all the time. A player is injured and plays because without him the team might miss the playoffs. Or the team doesn't play an injured player because they don't need him to win or make the playoffs...or believe that losing one game is less important than having that player healthy for an extended time.Originally posted by channthemanFootball is a violent game. Welker and Brady could have gotten hurt any week of the year. Just because it was in a "meaningless" (no such thing) game doesn't make it a bad decision to play them.Originally posted by packers11Tell that to Patriot fans today
And, yes, there are meaningless games. Once you are out of the playoffs, the games are meaningless.
They would't forfeit....gotta pay salaries and the NFL has a tv contract both local and national.
Comment
-
and going for it on 4th and one backed up to your own red zone is brilliant.Originally posted by channthemanFootball is a violent game. Welker and Brady could have gotten hurt any week of the year. Just because it was in a "meaningless" (no such thing) game doesn't make it a bad decision to play them.Originally posted by packers11Tell that to Patriot fans today
The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi
Comment
-
Welker didn't get hurt "any week of the year." He got hurt in a meaningless game. These games don't count much more than preseason games.Originally posted by channthemanFootball is a violent game. Welker and Brady could have gotten hurt any week of the year. Just because it was in a "meaningless" (no such thing) game doesn't make it a bad decision to play them.Originally posted by packers11Tell that to Patriot fans today
The Packers sat Woodson after he got dinged up. I would be willing to bet that if the NFL tries to enforce something, a lot of star players will develop minor injuries and not play much.
A team can only sit players when they are doing well enough to have clinched early. Basically, fans are complaining because their team is playing too well. Just shutup and enjoy that your team has the luxury of resting and protecting their best players. I would be pissed as hell if Rodgers played in the 4th Quarter and got hurt.
Comment
-
They're meaningful in the sense that every game you lose after elimination moves you up in the draft.Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsSure it does. You minimize risk. Teams do it all the time. A player is injured and plays because without him the team might miss the playoffs. Or the team doesn't play an injured player because they don't need him to win or make the playoffs...or believe that losing one game is less important than having that player healthy for an extended time.Originally posted by channthemanFootball is a violent game. Welker and Brady could have gotten hurt any week of the year. Just because it was in a "meaningless" (no such thing) game doesn't make it a bad decision to play them.Originally posted by packers11Tell that to Patriot fans today
And, yes, there are meaningless games. Once you are out of the playoffs, the games are meaningless.
Hopefully this will remind everyone why an 18 game season is a bad idea.
Comment
-
Wes Welker's injury was not the result of contact; he was trying to make a sharp cut and hurt his knee without anyone from Houston so much as laying a finger on him. That klind of injury could happen just as easily in practice, and I think one should be a little cautious overgeneralizing from his unfortunate injury.Teamwork is what the Green Bay Packers were all about. They didn't do it for individual glory. They did it because they loved one another.
Vince Lombardi
Comment
-
Scott, everyone wants to see two more Detroit Lions and St. Louis Rams games - well, at least the teams playing them would.Originally posted by Scott CampbellThey're meaningful in the sense that every game you lose after elimination moves you up in the draft.Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsSure it does. You minimize risk. Teams do it all the time. A player is injured and plays because without him the team might miss the playoffs. Or the team doesn't play an injured player because they don't need him to win or make the playoffs...or believe that losing one game is less important than having that player healthy for an extended time.Originally posted by channthemanFootball is a violent game. Welker and Brady could have gotten hurt any week of the year. Just because it was in a "meaningless" (no such thing) game doesn't make it a bad decision to play them.Originally posted by packers11Tell that to Patriot fans today
And, yes, there are meaningless games. Once you are out of the playoffs, the games are meaningless.
Hopefully this will remind everyone why an 18 game season is a bad idea."Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Comment
-
I proposed the NFL ban planting and cutting a few weeks ago and was ignored. Who is laughing now?Originally posted by BadgerinmaineWes Welker's injury was not the result of contact; he was trying to make a sharp cut and hurt his knee without anyone from Houston so much as laying a finger on him. That klind of injury could happen just as easily in practice, and I think one should be a little cautious overgeneralizing from his unfortunate injury."Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Comment


Comment