Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

CARDS SAW A WEAKNESS AND EXPLOITED IT

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 11
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 4 11 template Next
  • #1

    CARDS SAW A WEAKNESS AND EXPLOITED IT

    Troy Aikman commented yesterday that their head coach noted he really saw some things in the middle of the field that he felt AZ could take advantage of. Used some nice stack formations that seemed to help Fitz get free and make a guy most of us had never heard of look like a Pro Bowler. The only Doucette I ever knew was a broadcaster for the Bucks about fifteen years ago.

    Dom Capers had no counter. I'm not sure there was any. They were going after Mr Bush, Mr Bigby, and whatever backups we put out there to replace them.

    The Cardinals saw a weakness in the middle of the field against the Packers and exploited it heavily. They lined up their receivers close together in "stack" formations, and when there was man-to-man coverage it was hard for the outside defender to get through traffic to his man.


    Great Game Plan. Kudos to Winsenhunt !
    TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER
    Tags: None
  • #2
    mike mckenzie

    Comment

    • #3
      Originally posted by red
      mike mckenzie
      Maybe if the Packers had resigned Gilbert Brown the run defense would have been better as well.

      What is it with Packer fans and wanting former players
      Go PACK

      Comment

      • #4
        you think Mike McKenzie is not better than Jarrett Bush?

        Comment

        • #5
          Originally posted by Administrator
          you think Mike McKenzie is not better than Jarrett Bush?
          I think Jolly in coverage is better
          Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

          Comment

          • #6
            Originally posted by Administrator
            you think Mike McKenzie is not better than Jarrett Bush?
            exactly new guy

            i've said it before and i'll say it again. bush should never be allowed on the field. we would almost be better off only putting 10 guys out of defense

            he's just a disaster. myself and other of said almost all year that you have to find something better then bush, he's too mush of a liability

            they made us pay last night for keeping bush. he was burned over and over again

            Comment

            • #7
              Originally posted by Tony Oday
              Originally posted by Administrator
              you think Mike McKenzie is not better than Jarrett Bush?
              I think Jolly in coverage is better
              Had I been a fan of any other team yesterday, I might have laughed when I saw that. Instead I said, WTF was that?

              Comment

              • #8
                Originally posted by red
                Originally posted by Administrator
                you think Mike McKenzie is not better than Jarrett Bush?
                exactly new guy

                i've said it before and i'll say it again. bush should never be allowed on the field. we would almost be better off only putting 10 guys out of defense

                he's just a disaster. myself and other of said almost all year that you have to find something better then bush, he's too mush of a liability

                they made us pay last night for keeping bush. he was burned over and over again
                Underwood had an ok game yesterday. I can see him moving ahead of Bush next year on the depth chart.
                When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.

                Comment

                • #9
                  Originally posted by denverYooper
                  Originally posted by red
                  Originally posted by Administrator
                  you think Mike McKenzie is not better than Jarrett Bush?
                  exactly new guy

                  i've said it before and i'll say it again. bush should never be allowed on the field. we would almost be better off only putting 10 guys out of defense

                  he's just a disaster. myself and other of said almost all year that you have to find something better then bush, he's too mush of a liability

                  they made us pay last night for keeping bush. he was burned over and over again
                  Underwood had an ok game yesterday. I can see him moving ahead of Bush next year on the depth chart.
                  I could see a paper bag moving ahead of Bush. Bush and Chillar were constantly out of place in the first half. Those 2 need to see the bench often.
                  Originally posted by 3irty1
                  This is museum quality stupidity.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Administrator
                    Originally posted by Tony Oday
                    Originally posted by Administrator
                    you think Mike McKenzie is not better than Jarrett Bush?
                    I think Jolly in coverage is better
                    Had I been a fan of any other team yesterday, I might have laughed when I saw that. Instead I said, WTF was that?

                    Fritz dropped Gilbert into coverage during the Superbowl win.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      How many of those 10+ wide open catches were Bush's fault? Maybe a couple. I bet Woodson got beat as much as Bush....

                      Bigby was out and the announcers didn't even notice. The scrubs we had in were killing us. Bush was not the biggest of the problems out there. He's just a convenient scape goat.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Originally posted by sharpe1027
                        How many of those 10+ wide open catches were Bush's fault? Maybe a couple. I bet Woodson got beat as much as Bush....

                        Bigby was out and the announcers didn't even notice. The scrubs we had in were killing us. Bush was not the biggest of the problems out there. He's just a convenient scape goat.
                        Woodson got beat twice against Fitzgerald. Both for TDs. At least one could have been called an offensive PI. Maybe both. But probably just the second one. I can't blame Woodson for those. I think there were two other passes where he was around the play, but I don't know if those were his assignments or if he was free-lancing over to the play.
                        No longer the member of any fan clubs. I'm tired of jinxing players out of the league and into obscurity.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Get over Mike McKenzie. You won't be seeing NO picking him up to play this week.

                          Also, they did not attack Bigby. They went much shorter in the middle. If a safety was getting torched, my bet would be Collins, not Bigby at this point.

                          I would suggest reading this: http://www.jsonline.com/packerinsider/81142762.html

                          Baranczyk covers the problem he believes the Packers had with the combo routes and the middle of the field. He also agrees with KYPack's dissection of the options available to the Packers for more pressure. He sees them as dismal, as currently staffed.
                          Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            Originally posted by pbmax
                            Get over Mike McKenzie. You won't be seeing NO picking him up to play this week.

                            Also, they did not attack Bigby. They went much shorter in the middle. If a safety was getting torched, my bet would be Collins, not Bigby at this point.

                            I would suggest reading this: http://www.jsonline.com/packerinsider/81142762.html

                            Baranczyk covers the problem he believes the Packers had with the combo routes and the middle of the field. He also agrees with KYPack's dissection of the options available to the Packers for more pressure. He sees them as dismal, as currently staffed.
                            Problem is, Bigby was no where to be found in middle - short, mid, or deep, against the run or against the pass. He covered no one and offered no help. When he did bumble into a play, which wasn't often, he was missing tackles, grabbing facemasks and otherwise sucking ass.

                            Outside of Matthews, our D line created no pressure, so our defense was forced to match their formations, which meant having our shitty players on the field (namely Bush, who couldn't figure out who to cover, much less fail at trying to cover them, and Chillar, who looked like a boob as usual), and Arizona exposed them for what they are. Bigby is what he is and couldn't offer anything to offset those mismatches. Too bad, so sad. We need to find a lot of safety help before next fall for those times when our D line is struggling.
                            "You're all very smart, and I'm very dumb." - Partial

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Smidgeon
                              Originally posted by sharpe1027
                              How many of those 10+ wide open catches were Bush's fault? Maybe a couple. I bet Woodson got beat as much as Bush....

                              Bigby was out and the announcers didn't even notice. The scrubs we had in were killing us. Bush was not the biggest of the problems out there. He's just a convenient scape goat.
                              Woodson got beat twice against Fitzgerald. Both for TDs. At least one could have been called an offensive PI. Maybe both. But probably just the second one. I can't blame Woodson for those. I think there were two other passes where he was around the play, but I don't know if those were his assignments or if he was free-lancing over to the play.
                              Woodson gets beat, and we make excuses. Bush is hardly heard from and everyone blames him.

                              Comment

                              Previous 1 2 3 4 11 template Next
                              Working...
                              X