Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Players I'd Be Happy With at #23

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Players I'd Be Happy With at #23

    Okay, I'm no draftnik. I just hear or read what other people say or write and develop opinions based on whether or not the arguments are things I can get behind. That being said, my list probably has both reaches and players that will be long gone. It is your job to tell me which ones are which. Without further ado, the players I've seen around #23 on mock drafts that I could get excited about as a fan (in alphabetical order of position then first name):

    OLB Brandon Graham
    OG Mike Iupati
    OT Brian Bulaga
    OT Bruce Campbell
    RB CJ Spiller
    RB Jahvid Best (although I've also seen him mocked to the Packers in Round 2)

    Honorable Mention
    OT Charles Brown

    On three: 1...2...3...Debate!
    No longer the member of any fan clubs. I'm tired of jinxing players out of the league and into obscurity.

  • #2
    I wouldn't be thrilled with the RB's because I don't think MM would utilize them enough to justify a 1st round pick. He seems to prefer a workhorse RB who gets the lion's share of the carries. The rest I'd be fine with and would add Sergio Kindle
    I can't run no more
    With that lawless crowd
    While the killers in high places
    Say their prayers out loud
    But they've summoned, they've summoned up
    A thundercloud
    They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Players I'd Be Happy With at #23

      Originally posted by Smidgeon
      Okay, I'm no draftnik. I just hear or read what other people say or write and develop opinions based on whether or not the arguments are things I can get behind. That being said, my list probably has both reaches and players that will be long gone. It is your job to tell me which ones are which. Without further ado, the players I've seen around #23 on mock drafts that I could get excited about as a fan (in alphabetical order of position then first name):

      OLB Brandon Graham
      OG Mike Iupati
      OT Brian Bulaga
      OT Bruce Campbell
      RB CJ Spiller
      RB Jahvid Best (although I've also seen him mocked to the Packers in Round 2)

      Honorable Mention
      OT Charles Brown

      On three: 1...2...3...Debate!
      1. CJ Spiller - speed back to complement Ryan Grant and also would improve your special teams in the return game. Some scouts think he might be the next Chris Johnson

      2. Brian Bulaga- future stud at LT to protect our franchise QB, would love to select him but don't see him falling to the 23rd pick.

      3. Bruce Campbell- Has the talent to be as good as Bulaga IF he can improve his technique.

      4. Jahvid Best- top 10 talent but plenty of injury concerns.

      5. Mike Iupati- Don't know too much about this guy, can he play any tackle? I think we are fine with our interior line, don't see us using our 1st round pick on a guard.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Joemailman
        I wouldn't be thrilled with the RB's because I don't think MM would utilize them enough to justify a 1st round pick. He seems to prefer a workhorse RB who gets the lion's share of the carries. The rest I'd be fine with and would add Sergio Kindle
        Amen.
        One time Lombardi was disgusted with the team in practice and told them they were going to have to start with the basics. He held up a ball and said: "This is a football." McGee immediately called out, "Stop, coach, you're going too fast," and that gave everyone a laugh.
        John Maxymuk, Packers By The Numbers

        Comment


        • #5
          I'm no expert either but I would be happy with CJ Spiller, a good LT, or a good OLB to complement Matthews.

          Comment


          • #6
            No LB or RB

            We need DB and O line with first three then lets see some D line...can never have too many good men in the trenches.
            Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Maxie the Taxi
              Originally posted by Joemailman
              I wouldn't be thrilled with the RB's because I don't think MM would utilize them enough to justify a 1st round pick. He seems to prefer a workhorse RB who gets the lion's share of the carries. The rest I'd be fine with and would add Sergio Kindle
              Amen.
              To his defense look at the RBs he has had to work with in GB.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Brandon494
                Originally posted by Maxie the Taxi
                Originally posted by Joemailman
                I wouldn't be thrilled with the RB's because I don't think MM would utilize them enough to justify a 1st round pick. He seems to prefer a workhorse RB who gets the lion's share of the carries. The rest I'd be fine with and would add Sergio Kindle
                Amen.
                To his defense look at the RBs he has had to work with in GB.
                Agreed. I think MM is more innovative than people either notice or want to give him credit. I think if MM had Spiller, he'd use him and use him well.
                No longer the member of any fan clubs. I'm tired of jinxing players out of the league and into obscurity.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Smidgeon: "I think MM is more innovative than people either notice or want to give him credit. I think if MM had Spiller, he'd use him and use him well."

                  I won't dispute that. He'd use him mostly as a pass receiver and as a RB that can turn the edge. My only thought is that we didn't lose in the playoffs and lose against elite QB's because we lacked a higher powered offense. We lost because we couldn't pressure the QB without bringing the house. Thus, IMO, we need a guy like Sergio Kindle (or another pass rushing DE phenom) more than Spiller. Some would also argue we need replacements for Clifton and Tauscher, who are often insjured and not as effective as in years past, more than we need Spiller.

                  That said, I don't think Spiller will be available, but if TT picks him, fine. However, he better also have some solutions lined up to fix the pass rush and O-line problems of this year.
                  One time Lombardi was disgusted with the team in practice and told them they were going to have to start with the basics. He held up a ball and said: "This is a football." McGee immediately called out, "Stop, coach, you're going too fast," and that gave everyone a laugh.
                  John Maxymuk, Packers By The Numbers

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Players I'd Be Happy With at #23

                    Originally posted by Smidgeon
                    Okay, I'm no draftnik. I just hear or read what other people say or write and develop opinions based on whether or not the arguments are things I can get behind. That being said, my list probably has both reaches and players that will be long gone. It is your job to tell me which ones are which. Without further ado, the players I've seen around #23 on mock drafts that I could get excited about as a fan (in alphabetical order of position then first name):

                    OLB Brandon Graham
                    OG Mike Iupati
                    OT Brian Bulaga
                    OT Bruce Campbell
                    RB CJ Spiller
                    RB Jahvid Best (although I've also seen him mocked to the Packers in Round 2)

                    Honorable Mention
                    OT Charles Brown

                    On three: 1...2...3...Debate!
                    I could get on board with anyone on that list except maybe Best. I think its a little early at 23. Still, I wouldn't be upset and if we traded down to get him, that would be great. Iupati and Campbell scare me a bit because both would need to be coached up quite a bit and our OL coaches don't inspire a lot of confidence (at least not in me). That said, I think both have the talent to be LTs so it would be great to add that type of talent to our roster. Love Spiller, Love Bulaga, Love Graham (although I want to see how he does in space). One person I'd add is Sergio Kindle. Don't know much about him but his athletism would be intriguing opposite Clay.
                    Fred's Slacks is a Winner!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      All I know is that when Clifton's lining up at left tackle next fall, I would like a promising rookie left tackle sitting on the bench, watching and learning, and advanced enough to be able to step in the season after.
                      "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

                      KYPack

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Fritz
                        All I know is that when Clifton's lining up at left tackle next fall, I would like a promising rookie left tackle sitting on the bench, watching and learning, and advanced enough to be able to step in the season after.
                        More promising than Barbre, Giacomini and Colledge?
                        One time Lombardi was disgusted with the team in practice and told them they were going to have to start with the basics. He held up a ball and said: "This is a football." McGee immediately called out, "Stop, coach, you're going too fast," and that gave everyone a laugh.
                        John Maxymuk, Packers By The Numbers

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          i'm not even about to make a list

                          if i do we'll just end up with justin harrell part 2

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by red
                            i'm not even about to make a list

                            if i do we'll just end up with justin harrell part 2
                            My list will definitely be changing as the draft approaches. There's still free-agency and the combine to go through.
                            No longer the member of any fan clubs. I'm tired of jinxing players out of the league and into obscurity.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Fritz
                              All I know is that when Clifton's lining up at left tackle next fall, I would like a promising rookie left tackle sitting on the bench, watching and learning, and advanced enough to be able to step in the season after.
                              +1.

                              I'd feel pretty good about a Campbell pick if they re-signed Cliffy and let him work at LT only behind Chad. I would also be ok with Ducasse as a 2nd/3rd round pickup in a similar situation behind rither Cliffy or Tausch.
                              When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X